The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7 |
Resumo: | Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this context, understanding how this system behaves under two different modulatory conditions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS), will provide important insights towards the understanding of the attention network system. Twenty-seven healthy students took part on a randomized single-blinded crossover study, testing the effects that involved three modalities of unilateral stimulation (tRNS, anodal tDCS, and sham) over the DLPFC, during the performance of the attention network test (ANT) in three different conditions: standard, speed and accuracy. Results showed that tRNS was able to increase attention during more complex situations, namely by increasing alerting and decreasing conflict effect in the executive network. Under the Speed condition, tRNS increased efficiency of the alerting network, as well as under the more demanding conflict network, tRNS overall increased the performance when comparing to sham. No statistical significant effects of tDCS were observed. These results are compatible with the attention requiring the synchronization of pre-existing networks, rather the reinforcement or creation of new pathways. |
id |
RCAP_4bad1eddbaf5b4510c9321afacedeede |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/4464 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networksDirect current stimulationRandom noise stimulationAttention networksPsychologyNeuroscienceAttention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this context, understanding how this system behaves under two different modulatory conditions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS), will provide important insights towards the understanding of the attention network system. Twenty-seven healthy students took part on a randomized single-blinded crossover study, testing the effects that involved three modalities of unilateral stimulation (tRNS, anodal tDCS, and sham) over the DLPFC, during the performance of the attention network test (ANT) in three different conditions: standard, speed and accuracy. Results showed that tRNS was able to increase attention during more complex situations, namely by increasing alerting and decreasing conflict effect in the executive network. Under the Speed condition, tRNS increased efficiency of the alerting network, as well as under the more demanding conflict network, tRNS overall increased the performance when comparing to sham. No statistical significant effects of tDCS were observed. These results are compatible with the attention requiring the synchronization of pre-existing networks, rather the reinforcement or creation of new pathways.Springer Nature2022-09-12T10:15:20Z2022-09-122021-03-18T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfLema, A., Carvalho, S., Fregni, F., Gonçalves, O. F., & Leite, J. (2021). The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks. Scientific Reports, 11(Article ID 6201), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464Lema, A., Carvalho, S., Fregni, F., Gonçalves, O. F., & Leite, J. (2021). The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks. Scientific Reports, 11(Article ID 6201), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7eng2045-2322 (Electronic)https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85749-7http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLema, AlbertoCarvalho, SandraFregni, FelipeGonçalves, Óscar F.Leite, JorgeLeite, Jorgereponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-14T07:13:47Zoai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/4464Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:42:22.661628Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks |
title |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks |
spellingShingle |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks Lema, Alberto Direct current stimulation Random noise stimulation Attention networks Psychology Neuroscience |
title_short |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks |
title_full |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks |
title_fullStr |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks |
title_sort |
The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks |
author |
Lema, Alberto |
author_facet |
Lema, Alberto Carvalho, Sandra Fregni, Felipe Gonçalves, Óscar F. Leite, Jorge |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carvalho, Sandra Fregni, Felipe Gonçalves, Óscar F. Leite, Jorge |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lema, Alberto Carvalho, Sandra Fregni, Felipe Gonçalves, Óscar F. Leite, Jorge Leite, Jorge |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direct current stimulation Random noise stimulation Attention networks Psychology Neuroscience |
topic |
Direct current stimulation Random noise stimulation Attention networks Psychology Neuroscience |
description |
Attention is a complex cognitive process that selects specific stimuli for further processing. Previous research suggested the existence of three attentional networks: alerting, orienting and executive. However, one important topic is how to enhance the efficiency of attentional networks. In this context, understanding how this system behaves under two different modulatory conditions, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS), will provide important insights towards the understanding of the attention network system. Twenty-seven healthy students took part on a randomized single-blinded crossover study, testing the effects that involved three modalities of unilateral stimulation (tRNS, anodal tDCS, and sham) over the DLPFC, during the performance of the attention network test (ANT) in three different conditions: standard, speed and accuracy. Results showed that tRNS was able to increase attention during more complex situations, namely by increasing alerting and decreasing conflict effect in the executive network. Under the Speed condition, tRNS increased efficiency of the alerting network, as well as under the more demanding conflict network, tRNS overall increased the performance when comparing to sham. No statistical significant effects of tDCS were observed. These results are compatible with the attention requiring the synchronization of pre-existing networks, rather the reinforcement or creation of new pathways. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-18T00:00:00Z 2022-09-12T10:15:20Z 2022-09-12 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Lema, A., Carvalho, S., Fregni, F., Gonçalves, O. F., & Leite, J. (2021). The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks. Scientific Reports, 11(Article ID 6201), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464 http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464 Lema, A., Carvalho, S., Fregni, F., Gonçalves, O. F., & Leite, J. (2021). The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks. Scientific Reports, 11(Article ID 6201), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464 http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7 |
identifier_str_mv |
Lema, A., Carvalho, S., Fregni, F., Gonçalves, O. F., & Leite, J. (2021). The effects of direct current stimulation and random noise stimulation on attention networks. Scientific Reports, 11(Article ID 6201), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4464 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85749-7 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2045-2322 (Electronic) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85749-7 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134989081640960 |