Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Patrício, J.
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Ulanowicz, R., Pardal, M., Marques, J.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-1102-8
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/7841
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1102-8
Resumo: Previous studies have shown that when an ecosystem consists of many interacting components it becomes impossible to understand how it functions by focussing only on individual relationships. Alternatively, one can attempt to quantify system behaviour as a whole by developing ecological indicators that combine numerous environmental factors into a single value. One such holistic measure, called the system ‘ascendency’, arises from the analysis of networks of trophic exchanges. It deals with the joint quantification of overall system activity with the organisation of the component processes and can be used specifically to identify the occurrence of eutrophication. System ascendency analyses were applied to data over a gradient of eutrophication in a well documented small temperate intertidal estuary. Three areas were compared along the gradient, respectively, non eutrophic, intermediate eutrophic, and strongly eutrophic. Values of other measures related to the ascendency, such as the total system throughput, development capacity, and average mutual information, as well as the ascendency itself, were clearly higher in the non-eutrophic area. When the whole-system properties of the three areas were compared, however, the values associated with the intermediate eutrophic area turned out to be the lowest, which possibly could be attributed to the unstable nature of this area. The current study provided an example of how the measures arising out of?network analysis might lead to an improved understanding of the system functioning and of the eutrophication process itself.
id RCAP_4bc70d0338f5bc72da10a27c28cc114d
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/7841
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case StudyPrevious studies have shown that when an ecosystem consists of many interacting components it becomes impossible to understand how it functions by focussing only on individual relationships. Alternatively, one can attempt to quantify system behaviour as a whole by developing ecological indicators that combine numerous environmental factors into a single value. One such holistic measure, called the system ‘ascendency’, arises from the analysis of networks of trophic exchanges. It deals with the joint quantification of overall system activity with the organisation of the component processes and can be used specifically to identify the occurrence of eutrophication. System ascendency analyses were applied to data over a gradient of eutrophication in a well documented small temperate intertidal estuary. Three areas were compared along the gradient, respectively, non eutrophic, intermediate eutrophic, and strongly eutrophic. Values of other measures related to the ascendency, such as the total system throughput, development capacity, and average mutual information, as well as the ascendency itself, were clearly higher in the non-eutrophic area. When the whole-system properties of the three areas were compared, however, the values associated with the intermediate eutrophic area turned out to be the lowest, which possibly could be attributed to the unstable nature of this area. The current study provided an example of how the measures arising out of?network analysis might lead to an improved understanding of the system functioning and of the eutrophication process itself.2006info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/7841http://hdl.handle.net/10316/7841https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1102-8engHydrobiologia. 555:1 (2006) 19-30Patrício, J.Ulanowicz, R.Pardal, M.Marques, J.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-10-07T11:42:58Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/7841Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:55:33.493240Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
title Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
spellingShingle Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
Patrício, J.
Patrício, J.
title_short Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
title_full Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
title_fullStr Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
title_sort Ascendency as Ecological Indicator for Environmental Quality Assessment at the Ecosystem Level: A Case Study
author Patrício, J.
author_facet Patrício, J.
Patrício, J.
Ulanowicz, R.
Pardal, M.
Marques, J.
Ulanowicz, R.
Pardal, M.
Marques, J.
author_role author
author2 Ulanowicz, R.
Pardal, M.
Marques, J.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Patrício, J.
Ulanowicz, R.
Pardal, M.
Marques, J.
description Previous studies have shown that when an ecosystem consists of many interacting components it becomes impossible to understand how it functions by focussing only on individual relationships. Alternatively, one can attempt to quantify system behaviour as a whole by developing ecological indicators that combine numerous environmental factors into a single value. One such holistic measure, called the system ‘ascendency’, arises from the analysis of networks of trophic exchanges. It deals with the joint quantification of overall system activity with the organisation of the component processes and can be used specifically to identify the occurrence of eutrophication. System ascendency analyses were applied to data over a gradient of eutrophication in a well documented small temperate intertidal estuary. Three areas were compared along the gradient, respectively, non eutrophic, intermediate eutrophic, and strongly eutrophic. Values of other measures related to the ascendency, such as the total system throughput, development capacity, and average mutual information, as well as the ascendency itself, were clearly higher in the non-eutrophic area. When the whole-system properties of the three areas were compared, however, the values associated with the intermediate eutrophic area turned out to be the lowest, which possibly could be attributed to the unstable nature of this area. The current study provided an example of how the measures arising out of?network analysis might lead to an improved understanding of the system functioning and of the eutrophication process itself.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/7841
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/7841
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1102-8
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/7841
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1102-8
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Hydrobiologia. 555:1 (2006) 19-30
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822181953561952256
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-005-1102-8