Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Grol, Richard
Data de Publicação: 2000
Outros Autores: Wensing, Michel, Mainz, Jan, Jung, Hans Pete, Ferreira, Pedro Lopes, Hearnshaw, Hilary, Hjortdahl, Per, Olesen, Frede, Reis, Shm
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9927
Resumo: Background. Patients’ evaluations can be used to improve health care and compare general practice in different health systems. Aim. To identify aspects of general practice that are generally evaluated positively by patients and to compare opinions of patients in different European countries on actual care provision. Method. An internationally-validated questionnaire was distributed to and completed by patients in 10 European countries. A stratified sample of 36 practices per country, with at least 1080 patients per country, was included. A set of 23 validated questions on evaluations of different aspects of care was used, as well as questions on age, sex, overall health status, and frequency of visiting the GP. Results. The patient sample included 17 391 patients in 10 different countries; the average response rate was 79% (range = 67% to 89%). In general, patients visiting their general practitioner (GP) were very positive about the care provided. For most of the 23 selected aspects of care more than 80% viewed care as good or excellent; in particular, keeping records confidential, GP listening to patients, time during consultations, and quick services in case of urgent problems were evaluated positively. Patients were relatively negative about organisational aspects of care. The evaluations in different countries were largely similar, with some interesting differences; for instance, service and organisational aspects were evaluated more positively in fee-for-service health systems. Conclusions. Patients in Europe are positive about general practice but improvements in practice management in some countries are requested. More research is needed to study the complex field of differences in expectations and evaluations between countries with different health systems.
id RCAP_4c684ab3c4f5c4b7a7706ab9f0be71cf
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/9927
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparisonPatient evaluationsGeneral practiceInternational comparisonsBackground. Patients’ evaluations can be used to improve health care and compare general practice in different health systems. Aim. To identify aspects of general practice that are generally evaluated positively by patients and to compare opinions of patients in different European countries on actual care provision. Method. An internationally-validated questionnaire was distributed to and completed by patients in 10 European countries. A stratified sample of 36 practices per country, with at least 1080 patients per country, was included. A set of 23 validated questions on evaluations of different aspects of care was used, as well as questions on age, sex, overall health status, and frequency of visiting the GP. Results. The patient sample included 17 391 patients in 10 different countries; the average response rate was 79% (range = 67% to 89%). In general, patients visiting their general practitioner (GP) were very positive about the care provided. For most of the 23 selected aspects of care more than 80% viewed care as good or excellent; in particular, keeping records confidential, GP listening to patients, time during consultations, and quick services in case of urgent problems were evaluated positively. Patients were relatively negative about organisational aspects of care. The evaluations in different countries were largely similar, with some interesting differences; for instance, service and organisational aspects were evaluated more positively in fee-for-service health systems. Conclusions. Patients in Europe are positive about general practice but improvements in practice management in some countries are requested. More research is needed to study the complex field of differences in expectations and evaluations between countries with different health systems.2000-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/9927http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9927engBr J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov, 50(460): 882-7.Grol, RichardWensing, MichelMainz, JanJung, Hans PeteFerreira, Pedro LopesHearnshaw, HilaryHjortdahl, PerOlesen, FredeReis, Shminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2019-12-04T11:13:18Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/9927Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:45:38.021632Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
title Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
spellingShingle Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
Grol, Richard
Patient evaluations
General practice
International comparisons
title_short Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
title_full Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
title_fullStr Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
title_full_unstemmed Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
title_sort Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison
author Grol, Richard
author_facet Grol, Richard
Wensing, Michel
Mainz, Jan
Jung, Hans Pete
Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
Hearnshaw, Hilary
Hjortdahl, Per
Olesen, Frede
Reis, Shm
author_role author
author2 Wensing, Michel
Mainz, Jan
Jung, Hans Pete
Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
Hearnshaw, Hilary
Hjortdahl, Per
Olesen, Frede
Reis, Shm
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Grol, Richard
Wensing, Michel
Mainz, Jan
Jung, Hans Pete
Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
Hearnshaw, Hilary
Hjortdahl, Per
Olesen, Frede
Reis, Shm
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patient evaluations
General practice
International comparisons
topic Patient evaluations
General practice
International comparisons
description Background. Patients’ evaluations can be used to improve health care and compare general practice in different health systems. Aim. To identify aspects of general practice that are generally evaluated positively by patients and to compare opinions of patients in different European countries on actual care provision. Method. An internationally-validated questionnaire was distributed to and completed by patients in 10 European countries. A stratified sample of 36 practices per country, with at least 1080 patients per country, was included. A set of 23 validated questions on evaluations of different aspects of care was used, as well as questions on age, sex, overall health status, and frequency of visiting the GP. Results. The patient sample included 17 391 patients in 10 different countries; the average response rate was 79% (range = 67% to 89%). In general, patients visiting their general practitioner (GP) were very positive about the care provided. For most of the 23 selected aspects of care more than 80% viewed care as good or excellent; in particular, keeping records confidential, GP listening to patients, time during consultations, and quick services in case of urgent problems were evaluated positively. Patients were relatively negative about organisational aspects of care. The evaluations in different countries were largely similar, with some interesting differences; for instance, service and organisational aspects were evaluated more positively in fee-for-service health systems. Conclusions. Patients in Europe are positive about general practice but improvements in practice management in some countries are requested. More research is needed to study the complex field of differences in expectations and evaluations between countries with different health systems.
publishDate 2000
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2000-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9927
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9927
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9927
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov, 50(460): 882-7.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133730923610112