Effectiveness of different cellulose-based filtration materials against inhalation of SARS-CoV-2-like particles

• Autor(a) principal: Araújo, Alyne R. de
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Nunes, Lívio C. C., Oliveira, Karla C. B. F., Carvalho, Maria G. F. M., Cardoso, Juliana C., Severino, Patricia, Soares, Monica F. L. R., Souto, Eliana B., Lima, Gildário D.
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/73592
• topic: Respiratory protection equipment; Respirator face mask; Reusable mask; Filter material; FFP2-like filter; Health professionals; Ciências Médicas::Biotecnologia Médica

The respiratory protection equipment (RPE) used by health professionals consists of an essential device to prevent infectious diseases, especially those caused by biological agents such as the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). The current epidemiological panorama is worrying, and the context of creation and production of the mask has emerged as an alternative to RPE to face the public health crisis worldwide. The aim of this work is to present a low-cost alternative as an FFP2-like filter for a reusable respirator face mask. This study presents the comparison of different cellulose-based filtering materials performed by retention testing, time saturation testing, aerosol penetration testing, nanoparticle (~140 nm) filtration testing, bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE), analysis of material morphology and usability. The reusable respirator face mask used in this study is an open-source innovation, using 3D printing. Cotton disc proved to be the best filter material for the reusable mask, with satisfactory results and a performance similar to that shown by the N95-type mask. The cotton disc ensured effectiveness over 6 h of use, and after that, the reusable respirator face mask (here, Delfi-TRON®) needed to be sanitized and replenished with a new cotton disc. Upon preliminary analyses of filtration efficiency, the selected filter was shown to be a low-cost biodegradable and biocompatible alternative.