Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/14807 |
Resumo: | Background The emergence of specific therapies for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (CA) warrants the need for a systematic review of the literature. Methods and Results A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases on November 29, 2019. Studies were selected based on the following predefined eligibility criteria: English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, or observational studies, which included adult patients with variant/wild-type transthyretin-CA, assessed specific therapies for transthyretin-CA, and reported cardiovascular outcomes. Relevant data were extracted to a predefined template. Quality assessment was based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations (RCTs) or a checklist by Downs and Black (non-RCTs). From 1203 records, 24 publications were selected, describing 4 RCTs (6 publications) and 16 non-RCTs (18 publications). Tafamidis was shown to significantly improve all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations and reduce worsening in 6-minute walk test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary score, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) in variant/wild-type transthyretin-CA. Patisiran showed promising results in a subgroup analysis of patients with variant transthyretin-CA, which have to be confirmed in RCTs. Inotersen showed conflicting results on cardiac imaging parameters. The one study on AG10 had only a 1-month duration and cardiovascular end points were exploratory and limited to cardiac biomarkers. Limited evidence from noncomparative single-arm small non-RCTs existed for diflunisal, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (green tea extract), and doxycycline+tauroursodeoxycholic acid/ursodeoxycholic acid. Conclusions This systematic review of the literature supports the use of tafamidis in wild-type and variant transthyretin-CA. Novel therapeutic targets including transthyretin gene silencers are currently under investigation. |
id |
RCAP_4f5749334c6cb40447d048e1dc54ebd5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/14807 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendationsAmyloidTransthyretin-related amyloidosisCardiac amyloidosisTherapyTransthyretinBackground The emergence of specific therapies for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (CA) warrants the need for a systematic review of the literature. Methods and Results A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases on November 29, 2019. Studies were selected based on the following predefined eligibility criteria: English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, or observational studies, which included adult patients with variant/wild-type transthyretin-CA, assessed specific therapies for transthyretin-CA, and reported cardiovascular outcomes. Relevant data were extracted to a predefined template. Quality assessment was based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations (RCTs) or a checklist by Downs and Black (non-RCTs). From 1203 records, 24 publications were selected, describing 4 RCTs (6 publications) and 16 non-RCTs (18 publications). Tafamidis was shown to significantly improve all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations and reduce worsening in 6-minute walk test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary score, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) in variant/wild-type transthyretin-CA. Patisiran showed promising results in a subgroup analysis of patients with variant transthyretin-CA, which have to be confirmed in RCTs. Inotersen showed conflicting results on cardiac imaging parameters. The one study on AG10 had only a 1-month duration and cardiovascular end points were exploratory and limited to cardiac biomarkers. Limited evidence from noncomparative single-arm small non-RCTs existed for diflunisal, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (green tea extract), and doxycycline+tauroursodeoxycholic acid/ursodeoxycholic acid. Conclusions This systematic review of the literature supports the use of tafamidis in wild-type and variant transthyretin-CA. Novel therapeutic targets including transthyretin gene silencers are currently under investigation.American Heart AssociationSapientiaMarques, NunoAzevedo, OlgaAlmeida, Ana RitaBento, DinaCruz, InêsCorreia, EmanuelLourenço, CarolinaLopes, Luís Rocha2020-11-03T11:03:52Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/14807eng10.1161/JAHA.120.016614info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-11-29T10:33:28Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/14807Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-11-29T10:33:28Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations |
title |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations |
spellingShingle |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations Marques, Nuno Amyloid Transthyretin-related amyloidosis Cardiac amyloidosis Therapy Transthyretin |
title_short |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations |
title_full |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations |
title_fullStr |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations |
title_sort |
Specific therapy for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: a systematic literature review and evidence‐based recommendations |
author |
Marques, Nuno |
author_facet |
Marques, Nuno Azevedo, Olga Almeida, Ana Rita Bento, Dina Cruz, Inês Correia, Emanuel Lourenço, Carolina Lopes, Luís Rocha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Azevedo, Olga Almeida, Ana Rita Bento, Dina Cruz, Inês Correia, Emanuel Lourenço, Carolina Lopes, Luís Rocha |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sapientia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marques, Nuno Azevedo, Olga Almeida, Ana Rita Bento, Dina Cruz, Inês Correia, Emanuel Lourenço, Carolina Lopes, Luís Rocha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Amyloid Transthyretin-related amyloidosis Cardiac amyloidosis Therapy Transthyretin |
topic |
Amyloid Transthyretin-related amyloidosis Cardiac amyloidosis Therapy Transthyretin |
description |
Background The emergence of specific therapies for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (CA) warrants the need for a systematic review of the literature. Methods and Results A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases on November 29, 2019. Studies were selected based on the following predefined eligibility criteria: English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, or observational studies, which included adult patients with variant/wild-type transthyretin-CA, assessed specific therapies for transthyretin-CA, and reported cardiovascular outcomes. Relevant data were extracted to a predefined template. Quality assessment was based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations (RCTs) or a checklist by Downs and Black (non-RCTs). From 1203 records, 24 publications were selected, describing 4 RCTs (6 publications) and 16 non-RCTs (18 publications). Tafamidis was shown to significantly improve all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations and reduce worsening in 6-minute walk test, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary score, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) in variant/wild-type transthyretin-CA. Patisiran showed promising results in a subgroup analysis of patients with variant transthyretin-CA, which have to be confirmed in RCTs. Inotersen showed conflicting results on cardiac imaging parameters. The one study on AG10 had only a 1-month duration and cardiovascular end points were exploratory and limited to cardiac biomarkers. Limited evidence from noncomparative single-arm small non-RCTs existed for diflunisal, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (green tea extract), and doxycycline+tauroursodeoxycholic acid/ursodeoxycholic acid. Conclusions This systematic review of the literature supports the use of tafamidis in wild-type and variant transthyretin-CA. Novel therapeutic targets including transthyretin gene silencers are currently under investigation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-03T11:03:52Z 2020 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/14807 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/14807 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1161/JAHA.120.016614 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Heart Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Heart Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817549737378709504 |