Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tai, Zixue
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5894
Resumo: This article presents an analysis of a netnographic study of QQ groups engaged in contentious activities in China. Informed primarily by semi-structured in-depth interviews of 34 participants and field observations through years of grounded research, the findings shed light on the communicative dynamics and mobilization strategies of QQ groups in nurturing contentious action and motivating mass participation in social protest. In-group communication stays highly focused on the respective mission of the groups, and it cultivates a sense of shared awareness conducive to collective action. There is also a noticeable contagion effect that transfers the spirit of contestation in terms of speech and action. Mobilizing dynamics in the QQ groups point to a hybrid model of activist-brokered networks, which crosscuts and interconnects elements in Bennett and Segerberg’s (2012) prototype of self-organizing networks and organizationally brokered networks. Group leaders and activists resort to a multi-layered mechanism to dissipate contentious information and to mobilize participation in protests.
id RCAP_5014a23f3fb678bb2583f227f7f3d327
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5894
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in ChinaChina; collective action; connective action; QQ groups; social media; social protestThis article presents an analysis of a netnographic study of QQ groups engaged in contentious activities in China. Informed primarily by semi-structured in-depth interviews of 34 participants and field observations through years of grounded research, the findings shed light on the communicative dynamics and mobilization strategies of QQ groups in nurturing contentious action and motivating mass participation in social protest. In-group communication stays highly focused on the respective mission of the groups, and it cultivates a sense of shared awareness conducive to collective action. There is also a noticeable contagion effect that transfers the spirit of contestation in terms of speech and action. Mobilizing dynamics in the QQ groups point to a hybrid model of activist-brokered networks, which crosscuts and interconnects elements in Bennett and Segerberg’s (2012) prototype of self-organizing networks and organizationally brokered networks. Group leaders and activists resort to a multi-layered mechanism to dissipate contentious information and to mobilize participation in protests.Cogitatio2022-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5894oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5894Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): Protesting While Polarized: Digital Activism in Contentious Times; 66-762183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5894https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5894https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5894/5894Copyright (c) 2022 Zixue Taiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTai, Zixue2022-12-20T10:58:34Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5894Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:57.857647Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
title Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
spellingShingle Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
Tai, Zixue
China; collective action; connective action; QQ groups; social media; social protest
title_short Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
title_full Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
title_fullStr Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
title_full_unstemmed Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
title_sort Social Media and Contentious Action: The Use and Users of QQ Groups in China
author Tai, Zixue
author_facet Tai, Zixue
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tai, Zixue
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv China; collective action; connective action; QQ groups; social media; social protest
topic China; collective action; connective action; QQ groups; social media; social protest
description This article presents an analysis of a netnographic study of QQ groups engaged in contentious activities in China. Informed primarily by semi-structured in-depth interviews of 34 participants and field observations through years of grounded research, the findings shed light on the communicative dynamics and mobilization strategies of QQ groups in nurturing contentious action and motivating mass participation in social protest. In-group communication stays highly focused on the respective mission of the groups, and it cultivates a sense of shared awareness conducive to collective action. There is also a noticeable contagion effect that transfers the spirit of contestation in terms of speech and action. Mobilizing dynamics in the QQ groups point to a hybrid model of activist-brokered networks, which crosscuts and interconnects elements in Bennett and Segerberg’s (2012) prototype of self-organizing networks and organizationally brokered networks. Group leaders and activists resort to a multi-layered mechanism to dissipate contentious information and to mobilize participation in protests.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5894
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5894
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5894
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5894
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5894
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5894
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5894/5894
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Zixue Tai
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Zixue Tai
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): Protesting While Polarized: Digital Activism in Contentious Times; 66-76
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130656709541888