A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1088 |
Resumo: | As labor provisions in trade agreements have become increasingly ubiquitous, there remain questions about whether or not these provisions have been effective in improving working conditions in trading partner countries. Through an analysis of sample labor provisions in United States and European Union free trade agreements, this paper shows that both approaches, albeit using different methods, aim primarily to improve de jure labor law and de facto enforcement of that law by government regulatory institutions. This paper argues that instead, labor provisions ought to be grounded in a supply chain approach. A supply chain approach shifts the focus from impacting de jure and de facto labor law as administered by the state though sanctions or dialogue, and towards context specific, experimental, and coordinated private and public regulatory interventions that operate in key export industries that are implicated in trading partners’ supply chains. It does so in part by recognizing the potential regulatory power of consumer citizenship. |
id |
RCAP_508c23e150dfb13e931c5ca7307b4f08 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1088 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisionsconsumer citizenship; governance; labor provisions; supply chains; tradeAs labor provisions in trade agreements have become increasingly ubiquitous, there remain questions about whether or not these provisions have been effective in improving working conditions in trading partner countries. Through an analysis of sample labor provisions in United States and European Union free trade agreements, this paper shows that both approaches, albeit using different methods, aim primarily to improve de jure labor law and de facto enforcement of that law by government regulatory institutions. This paper argues that instead, labor provisions ought to be grounded in a supply chain approach. A supply chain approach shifts the focus from impacting de jure and de facto labor law as administered by the state though sanctions or dialogue, and towards context specific, experimental, and coordinated private and public regulatory interventions that operate in key export industries that are implicated in trading partners’ supply chains. It does so in part by recognizing the potential regulatory power of consumer citizenship.Cogitatio2017-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1088oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1088Politics and Governance; Vol 5, No 4 (2017): Labour Standards in a Global Environment; 60-682183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1088https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1088https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1088/1088Copyright (c) 2017 Kevin Kolbenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKolben, Kevin2022-12-22T15:15:38Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1088Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:11.070549Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions |
title |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions |
spellingShingle |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions Kolben, Kevin consumer citizenship; governance; labor provisions; supply chains; trade |
title_short |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions |
title_full |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions |
title_fullStr |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions |
title_sort |
A Supply Chain Approach to Trade and Labor Provisions |
author |
Kolben, Kevin |
author_facet |
Kolben, Kevin |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kolben, Kevin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
consumer citizenship; governance; labor provisions; supply chains; trade |
topic |
consumer citizenship; governance; labor provisions; supply chains; trade |
description |
As labor provisions in trade agreements have become increasingly ubiquitous, there remain questions about whether or not these provisions have been effective in improving working conditions in trading partner countries. Through an analysis of sample labor provisions in United States and European Union free trade agreements, this paper shows that both approaches, albeit using different methods, aim primarily to improve de jure labor law and de facto enforcement of that law by government regulatory institutions. This paper argues that instead, labor provisions ought to be grounded in a supply chain approach. A supply chain approach shifts the focus from impacting de jure and de facto labor law as administered by the state though sanctions or dialogue, and towards context specific, experimental, and coordinated private and public regulatory interventions that operate in key export industries that are implicated in trading partners’ supply chains. It does so in part by recognizing the potential regulatory power of consumer citizenship. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-14 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1088 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1088 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1088 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1088 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1088 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1088 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1088/1088 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Kevin Kolben http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Kevin Kolben http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 5, No 4 (2017): Labour Standards in a Global Environment; 60-68 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130668008996864 |