Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rebelo, Ana
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Capela, G., Cardoso, Jaime S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502
https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s10032-009-0100-1
Resumo: Many musical works produced in the past are still currently available only as original manuscripts or as photocopies. The preservation of these works requires their digitalization and transformation into a machine-readable format. However, and despite the many research activities on optical music recognition (OMR), the results for handwritten musical scores are far from ideal. Each of the proposed methods lays the emphasis on different properties and therefore makes it difficult to evaluate the efficiency of a proposed method. We present in this article a comparative study of several recognition algorithms of music symbols. After a review of the most common procedures used in this context, their respective performances are compared using both real and synthetic scores. The database of scores was augmented with replicas of the existing patterns, transformed according to an elastic deformation technique. Such transformations aim to introduce invariances in the prediction with respect to the known variability in the symbols, particularly relevant on handwritten works. The following study and the adopted databases can constitute a reference scheme for any researcher who wants to confront a new OMR algorithm face to well-known ones.
id RCAP_509002a6fc1a57a6f98d5a29270b1d47
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/2502
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative studyMusicPerformance evaluationSymbol recognitionDocument image processingOff-line recognitionMany musical works produced in the past are still currently available only as original manuscripts or as photocopies. The preservation of these works requires their digitalization and transformation into a machine-readable format. However, and despite the many research activities on optical music recognition (OMR), the results for handwritten musical scores are far from ideal. Each of the proposed methods lays the emphasis on different properties and therefore makes it difficult to evaluate the efficiency of a proposed method. We present in this article a comparative study of several recognition algorithms of music symbols. After a review of the most common procedures used in this context, their respective performances are compared using both real and synthetic scores. The database of scores was augmented with replicas of the existing patterns, transformed according to an elastic deformation technique. Such transformations aim to introduce invariances in the prediction with respect to the known variability in the symbols, particularly relevant on handwritten works. The following study and the adopted databases can constitute a reference scheme for any researcher who wants to confront a new OMR algorithm face to well-known ones.2019-01-03T17:03:26Z2019-01-032010-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfRebelo, A., Capela, G., & Cardoso, J. S. (2010). Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 13(1), 19-31. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502Rebelo, A., Capela, G., & Cardoso, J. S. (2010). Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 13(1), 19-31. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s10032-009-0100-1eng1433-2833https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10032-009-0100-1http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRebelo, AnaCapela, G.Cardoso, Jaime S.reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-16T02:12:23Zoai:repositorio.upt.pt:11328/2502Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:41:20.252673Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
title Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
spellingShingle Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
Rebelo, Ana
Music
Performance evaluation
Symbol recognition
Document image processing
Off-line recognition
title_short Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
title_full Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
title_fullStr Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
title_sort Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study
author Rebelo, Ana
author_facet Rebelo, Ana
Capela, G.
Cardoso, Jaime S.
author_role author
author2 Capela, G.
Cardoso, Jaime S.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rebelo, Ana
Capela, G.
Cardoso, Jaime S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Music
Performance evaluation
Symbol recognition
Document image processing
Off-line recognition
topic Music
Performance evaluation
Symbol recognition
Document image processing
Off-line recognition
description Many musical works produced in the past are still currently available only as original manuscripts or as photocopies. The preservation of these works requires their digitalization and transformation into a machine-readable format. However, and despite the many research activities on optical music recognition (OMR), the results for handwritten musical scores are far from ideal. Each of the proposed methods lays the emphasis on different properties and therefore makes it difficult to evaluate the efficiency of a proposed method. We present in this article a comparative study of several recognition algorithms of music symbols. After a review of the most common procedures used in this context, their respective performances are compared using both real and synthetic scores. The database of scores was augmented with replicas of the existing patterns, transformed according to an elastic deformation technique. Such transformations aim to introduce invariances in the prediction with respect to the known variability in the symbols, particularly relevant on handwritten works. The following study and the adopted databases can constitute a reference scheme for any researcher who wants to confront a new OMR algorithm face to well-known ones.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-01-03T17:03:26Z
2019-01-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Rebelo, A., Capela, G., & Cardoso, J. S. (2010). Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 13(1), 19-31. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502
Rebelo, A., Capela, G., & Cardoso, J. S. (2010). Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 13(1), 19-31. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502
http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502
https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s10032-009-0100-1
identifier_str_mv Rebelo, A., Capela, G., & Cardoso, J. S. (2010). Optical recognition of music symbols: A comparative study. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 13(1), 19-31. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/2502
https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/s10032-009-0100-1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1433-2833
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10032-009-0100-1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134976989462528