Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment. |
id |
RCAP_509d307b68e3412e4661ea4c8c1ece50 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of EfficacyPUVA Oral Versus Banho PUVA na Psoríase em Placas: Um Estudo Comparativo de EficáciaAdministrationOralTopicalBathsPUVA Therapy/methodsPsoriasis/therapyAdministração OralAdministração TópicaBanhosPsoríase/tratamentoTerapia PUVAIntroduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment.Introdução: A fototerapia é uma terapêutica bem consolidada no tratamento da psoríase, com uma relação risco-benefício bastante favorável. A fotoquimioterapia envolve a administração de psoraleno per os (PUVA oral) ou tópico (banho PUVA), antes da irradiação por UVA. A administração oral de psoraleno pode causar efeitos adversos, enquanto o banho PUVA tem a vantagem de diminuir a toxicidade sistémica e os efeitos adversos do psoraleno. O nosso estudo teve como principal objectivo comparar a eficácia entre as duas modalidades de PUVA.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospetivo, aplicado aos doentes com psoríase em placas tratados com PUVA no nosso serviço de Dermatologia, entre janeiro 2001 e dezembro 2016.Resultados: Foram realizados 81 ciclos de tratamentos com PUVA oral e 38 com banho PUVA, correspondendo a 68 e 26 doentes, respetivamente. A idade média foi de 50,6 anos. No primeiro grupo, o PASI 75 foi atingido em 68 casos (89,5%), e no grupo de banho PUVA em 26 (74,3%), com p = 0,05. A dose média para atingir o PASI 75 no grupo PUVA oral foi de 113,1 J/cm2 e no grupo banho PUVA de 69,8 J/cm2. No grupo PUVA oral, o número médio de sessões realizadas para atingir PASI 75 foi de 23,31, e no grupo banho PUVA 17,58.Conclusão: Embora exija equipamento especializado e mais tempo de execução, o banho PUVA pode ser considerado ainda um dos tratamentos mais eficazes na psoríase, sobretudo num grupo particular de doentes não candidatos a terapêuticas sistémicas.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2018-05-29T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 2 (2018): April - June; 165-168Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 2 (2018): Abril - Junho; 165-1682182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889/565Kieselova, KatarinaSantiago, FelicidadeHenrique, Martinhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-06T12:35:07Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:06.182072Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy PUVA Oral Versus Banho PUVA na Psoríase em Placas: Um Estudo Comparativo de Eficácia |
title |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy |
spellingShingle |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy Kieselova, Katarina Administration Oral Topical Baths PUVA Therapy/methods Psoriasis/therapy Administração Oral Administração Tópica Banhos Psoríase/tratamento Terapia PUVA |
title_short |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy |
title_full |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy |
title_fullStr |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy |
title_sort |
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy |
author |
Kieselova, Katarina |
author_facet |
Kieselova, Katarina Santiago, Felicidade Henrique, Martinha |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santiago, Felicidade Henrique, Martinha |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kieselova, Katarina Santiago, Felicidade Henrique, Martinha |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Administration Oral Topical Baths PUVA Therapy/methods Psoriasis/therapy Administração Oral Administração Tópica Banhos Psoríase/tratamento Terapia PUVA |
topic |
Administration Oral Topical Baths PUVA Therapy/methods Psoriasis/therapy Administração Oral Administração Tópica Banhos Psoríase/tratamento Terapia PUVA |
description |
Introduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-29T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889 oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889 https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889 https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889/565 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 2 (2018): April - June; 165-168 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 2 (2018): Abril - Junho; 165-168 2182-2409 2182-2395 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130566804635648 |