Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kieselova, Katarina
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Santiago, Felicidade, Henrique, Martinha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889
Resumo: Introduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment.
id RCAP_509d307b68e3412e4661ea4c8c1ece50
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of EfficacyPUVA Oral Versus Banho PUVA na Psoríase em Placas: Um Estudo Comparativo de EficáciaAdministrationOralTopicalBathsPUVA Therapy/methodsPsoriasis/therapyAdministração OralAdministração TópicaBanhosPsoríase/tratamentoTerapia PUVAIntroduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment.Introdução: A fototerapia é uma terapêutica bem consolidada no tratamento da psoríase, com uma relação risco-benefício bastante favorável. A fotoquimioterapia envolve a administração de psoraleno per os (PUVA oral) ou tópico (banho PUVA), antes da irradiação por UVA. A administração oral de psoraleno pode causar efeitos adversos, enquanto o banho PUVA tem a vantagem de diminuir a toxicidade sistémica e os efeitos adversos do psoraleno. O nosso estudo teve como principal objectivo comparar a eficácia entre as duas modalidades de PUVA.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospetivo, aplicado aos doentes com psoríase em placas tratados com PUVA no nosso serviço de Dermatologia, entre janeiro 2001 e dezembro 2016.Resultados: Foram realizados 81 ciclos de tratamentos com PUVA oral e 38 com banho PUVA, correspondendo a 68 e 26 doentes, respetivamente. A idade média foi de 50,6 anos. No primeiro grupo, o PASI 75 foi atingido em 68 casos (89,5%), e no grupo de banho PUVA em 26 (74,3%), com p = 0,05. A dose média para atingir o PASI 75 no grupo PUVA oral foi de 113,1 J/cm2 e no grupo banho PUVA de 69,8 J/cm2. No grupo PUVA oral, o número médio de sessões realizadas para atingir PASI 75 foi de 23,31, e no grupo banho PUVA 17,58.Conclusão: Embora exija equipamento especializado e mais tempo de execução, o banho PUVA pode ser considerado ainda um dos tratamentos mais eficazes na psoríase, sobretudo num grupo particular de doentes não candidatos a terapêuticas sistémicas.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2018-05-29T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 2 (2018): April - June; 165-168Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 2 (2018): Abril - Junho; 165-1682182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889/565Kieselova, KatarinaSantiago, FelicidadeHenrique, Martinhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-06T12:35:07Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:06.182072Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
PUVA Oral Versus Banho PUVA na Psoríase em Placas: Um Estudo Comparativo de Eficácia
title Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
spellingShingle Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
Kieselova, Katarina
Administration
Oral
Topical
Baths
PUVA Therapy/methods
Psoriasis/therapy
Administração Oral
Administração Tópica
Banhos
Psoríase/tratamento
Terapia PUVA
title_short Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
title_full Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
title_fullStr Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
title_sort Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy
author Kieselova, Katarina
author_facet Kieselova, Katarina
Santiago, Felicidade
Henrique, Martinha
author_role author
author2 Santiago, Felicidade
Henrique, Martinha
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kieselova, Katarina
Santiago, Felicidade
Henrique, Martinha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Administration
Oral
Topical
Baths
PUVA Therapy/methods
Psoriasis/therapy
Administração Oral
Administração Tópica
Banhos
Psoríase/tratamento
Terapia PUVA
topic Administration
Oral
Topical
Baths
PUVA Therapy/methods
Psoriasis/therapy
Administração Oral
Administração Tópica
Banhos
Psoríase/tratamento
Terapia PUVA
description Introduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-29T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889
url https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/889
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.2.889
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/889/565
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 2 (2018): April - June; 165-168
Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 2 (2018): Abril - Junho; 165-168
2182-2409
2182-2395
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130566804635648