Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres. Our objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients. Methods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor. Results: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB. Repeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB. Discussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB. |
id |
RCAP_510185d4dfd58ae59f8a2ed3e2afd36e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/147 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary ResectionResultado de Segunda Ressecção Transuretral de Neoplasia Vesical Após Ressecção Primária Macroscopicamente CompletaNeoplasm Recurrence, Local ReoperationUrinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgeryNeoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRecidiva Local de NeoplasiaReoperaçãoIntroduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres. Our objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients. Methods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor. Results: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB. Repeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB. Discussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB.Introdução: O cancro da bexiga não músculo-invasivo corres- ponde a 75% dos casos de cancro da bexiga, sendo que a maioria são inicialmente diagnosticados e tratados com ressecção transuretral (RTU). Depois de uma RTU primária macroscopicamente incompleta, uma segunda ressecção (reRTU); no entanto, a reRTU é recomendada pelas linhas de orientação da EAU mesmo quando a ressecção inicial é macroscopicamente completa, com taxas de neoplasia residual entre 33%-55% e upstaging em até 25% dos casos. Dado que a qualidade da RTU primária tem impacto significativo no resultado anatomopatológico de uma reRTU, estas taxas são largamente dependentes do tratamento primário e da acuidade de determinação intraopera- tória de ressecção macroscopicamente completa, com uma provável variabilidade grande entre Centros e cirurgiões. Os objectivos foram averiguar se a reRTU após RTU primária macroscopicamente completa mostraria taxas de neoplasia residual significativas e se a realização deste procedimento melhoraria os resultados do tratamento do cancro da bexiga não músculo-invasivo. Métodos: Doentes submetidos a RTU entre 2015 e 2017 foram analisados, identificando quais realizaram reRTU planeada sem controlo cistoscópico entre as intervenções. Foi realizada correlação da percepção de RTU primária completa, estadio e grau com a presença, estadio e grau de neoplasia residual. Resultados: Foram analisadas 546 RTUs; destas, 275 (50,4%) foram por neoplasia primária. Oitenta cinco doentes (30,9%) ti- nham pT1; destes, 12 foram seleccionados para reRTU por ressecção incompleta. Dos restantes 73 casos de pT1 primário com ressecção completa, 26 (30,6%) foram submetidos a reRTU. A reRTU após ressecção completa de pT1 primário mostrou neoplasia residual em 11,5% dos doentes (n=3). Todos os doentes com tumor residual tinham neoplasia primária de alto grau; não se verificou upstaging ou upgrading. A taxa de recorrência ao 1o ano foi semelhante nos doentes submetidos ou não a reRTU. Discussão / Conclusão: Os padrões de técnica e profundidade de RTU variam entre Centros e cirurgiões, e vão invariavelmente reflectir-se na taxa de neoplasia residual. A reRTU pode não ser benéfica para todos os casos, e dados de cada centro devem ser considerados na selecção.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2022-01-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 37 No. 1-2 (2020): January - June; 7-11Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 37 n. 1-2 (2020): Janeiro - Junho; 7-112387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147/61Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Association of Urologyhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEliseu, MiguelMarques, VeraAntunes, HugoLourenço, MárioTavares-da-Silva, EdgarTemido, PauloFigueiredo, Arnaldo2023-04-09T06:45:07Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/147Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:55.163647Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection Resultado de Segunda Ressecção Transuretral de Neoplasia Vesical Após Ressecção Primária Macroscopicamente Completa |
title |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection |
spellingShingle |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection Eliseu, Miguel Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Reoperation Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Reoperação |
title_short |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection |
title_full |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection |
title_fullStr |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection |
title_sort |
Results of Repeat Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor After Macroscopically Complete Primary Resection |
author |
Eliseu, Miguel |
author_facet |
Eliseu, Miguel Marques, Vera Antunes, Hugo Lourenço, Mário Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Temido, Paulo Figueiredo, Arnaldo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, Vera Antunes, Hugo Lourenço, Mário Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Temido, Paulo Figueiredo, Arnaldo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Eliseu, Miguel Marques, Vera Antunes, Hugo Lourenço, Mário Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Temido, Paulo Figueiredo, Arnaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Reoperation Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Reoperação |
topic |
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Reoperation Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Reoperação |
description |
Introduction: Non-muscle invasive (NMI) bladder cancers (BC) account for 75% of BC cases, and most are initially diagnosed and treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB). After primary TURB, a repeat resection (rTURB) should be carried out in cases of incomplete resection; however, rTURB is recommended by EAU guidelines in pT1 tumors even when the completeness of the original resection is believed by the surgeon, with reported rates of residual tumor in up to 33%-55% and upstaging in up to 25%. Since the quality of initial resection impacts in the result of a rTURB, these rates are largely dependent on the primary treatment and accurate prediction of completeness, with a probable high variability between surgeons and Centres. Our objectives to determine whether rTURB after initial perceived complete resection would frequently identify residual tumor and if this procedure would improve outcomes in NMIBC patients. Methods: Patients submitted to TURB from 2015 to 2017 were analysed, identifying which underwent rTURB after initial resection without follow-up cystoscopy in between. Primary perception of completeness, stage and grade were correlated with the eventual presence, stage and grade of residual tumor. Results: We analyzed 546 TURB procedures; of these, 275 (50.4%) were for primary bladder cancer. pT1 lesions were found in 85 (30.9%) of primary TURBs; 12 of these were selected for rTURB due to incomplete resection. Of the remaining 73 macros- copically completely resected primary pT1 tumors, 26 (30.6%) underwent elective rTURB. Repeat TURB after complete resection of primary pT1 tumors yielded residual tumor in 11.5% of patients (n= 3). All patients with residual tumor had primary pT1 high grade lesions; no upstaging or upgrading was observed. Patients had similar recurrence rates at 1-year regardless of rTURB. Discussion/Conclusion: Standard practice in primary TURB pro- cedures varies across surgeons and centers and will reflect on residual tumor rates. Indications for rTURB might not be suitable for all patients, and single Centre results should be taken in consideration when selecting patients for rTURB. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147 https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.37.1-2.147 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147 http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/147/61 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Association of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Association of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 37 No. 1-2 (2020): January - June; 7-11 Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 37 n. 1-2 (2020): Janeiro - Junho; 7-11 2387-0419 2341-4022 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130427755069440 |