Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Quintão, Sónia
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Delgado, Ana R., Prieto, Gerardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/40818
Resumo: Our objective was to conduct a validation study of the Portuguese version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) by means of the Rasch Rating Scale Model, and then compare it with the most used scales of anxiety in Portugal. The sample consisted of 1,160 adults (427 men and 733 women), aged 18-82 years old (M=33.39; SD=11.85). Instruments were Beck Anxiety Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. It was found that Beck Anxiety Inventory's system of four categories, the data-model fit, and people reliability were adequate. The measure can be considered as unidimensional. Gender and age-related differences were not a threat to the validity. BAI correlated significantly with other anxiety measures. In conclusion, BAI shows good psychometric quality.
id RCAP_525e8a34fda84e8d946fc5256cecf4c9
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/40818
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale ModelOUTPATIENTSSYMPTOMSAnxietyassessmentBeck Anxiety InventoryRasch Rating Scale ModelDISORDERSPsychometricsAnxietyassessmentBeck Anxiety InventoryPsychometricsRasch Rating Scale ModelOur objective was to conduct a validation study of the Portuguese version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) by means of the Rasch Rating Scale Model, and then compare it with the most used scales of anxiety in Portugal. The sample consisted of 1,160 adults (427 men and 733 women), aged 18-82 years old (M=33.39; SD=11.85). Instruments were Beck Anxiety Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. It was found that Beck Anxiety Inventory's system of four categories, the data-model fit, and people reliability were adequate. The measure can be considered as unidimensional. Gender and age-related differences were not a threat to the validity. BAI correlated significantly with other anxiety measures. In conclusion, BAI shows good psychometric quality.Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)RUNQuintão, SóniaDelgado, Ana R.Prieto, Gerardo2018-07-04T21:03:09Z20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article6application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/40818eng0102-7972PURE: 242833https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000200010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:22:07Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/40818Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:31:17.043059Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
title Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
spellingShingle Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
Quintão, Sónia
OUTPATIENTS
SYMPTOMS
Anxiety
assessment
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Rasch Rating Scale Model
DISORDERS
Psychometrics
Anxiety
assessment
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Psychometrics
Rasch Rating Scale Model
title_short Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
title_full Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
title_fullStr Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
title_full_unstemmed Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
title_sort Validity Study of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Portuguese version) by the Rasch Rating Scale Model
author Quintão, Sónia
author_facet Quintão, Sónia
Delgado, Ana R.
Prieto, Gerardo
author_role author
author2 Delgado, Ana R.
Prieto, Gerardo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas (CEDOC)
NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quintão, Sónia
Delgado, Ana R.
Prieto, Gerardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv OUTPATIENTS
SYMPTOMS
Anxiety
assessment
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Rasch Rating Scale Model
DISORDERS
Psychometrics
Anxiety
assessment
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Psychometrics
Rasch Rating Scale Model
topic OUTPATIENTS
SYMPTOMS
Anxiety
assessment
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Rasch Rating Scale Model
DISORDERS
Psychometrics
Anxiety
assessment
Beck Anxiety Inventory
Psychometrics
Rasch Rating Scale Model
description Our objective was to conduct a validation study of the Portuguese version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) by means of the Rasch Rating Scale Model, and then compare it with the most used scales of anxiety in Portugal. The sample consisted of 1,160 adults (427 men and 733 women), aged 18-82 years old (M=33.39; SD=11.85). Instruments were Beck Anxiety Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. It was found that Beck Anxiety Inventory's system of four categories, the data-model fit, and people reliability were adequate. The measure can be considered as unidimensional. Gender and age-related differences were not a threat to the validity. BAI correlated significantly with other anxiety measures. In conclusion, BAI shows good psychometric quality.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-07-04T21:03:09Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/40818
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/40818
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0102-7972
PURE: 242833
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000200010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 6
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137936414867456

Registros relacionados