Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lebre, Ana
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Velez, Jorge, Seixas, Diana, Rabadão, Eduardo, Oliveira, Joaquim, Saraiva da Cunha, J., Silvestre, A. Meliço
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117
Resumo: Introduction: Brucellosis is an endemic zoonosis in Portugal. Brucellar spondylodiscitis is one of the most frequent focal manifestations which may cause severe sequelae despite appropriate therapy.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with diagnosis of brucellar spondylodiscitis admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department of Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, over a 25-year period (1988-2012).Results: We identified 54 patients, 55.6% male, mean age of 54.8 years. In 81.5% an epidemiological context was identified, mostly contact with sheep and goats. The duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was 5.5 months. The most common signs and symptoms were pain (98.1%), fever (46.3%) and neurological deficits (25.9%). Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was the most used imaging method (77.8%) showing abscesses in 29.6% of patients. Lumbar location predominated (77.7%). Diagnosis was attained in 47 patients (87.0%): positive blood cultures (3 patients), positive serology (32 patients) or by both methods (12 patients). Combined regimens of doxycycline and rifampicin (64.8%), or streptomycin (24.1%) were most used, for an average duration of 4.4 months. A patient was referred for surgery for abscess drainage. Evolution was mostly favorable (92.6%), no deaths occurring.Discussion: Research of the epidemiologic context turned out to be a major key leading to the diagnosis. Treatment of osteoarticular brucellosis is still controversial.Conclusions: Brucellar spondylodiscitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with low back pain, even in the absence of fever, particularly in regions where the disease is endemic. Antibiotic regimen, its’ duration and the need for surgery should be individualized to achieve a better prognosis. Cases have declined over the years, a fact related to better control of animal endemic.
id RCAP_5272db22c53505f9e7046650fd379188
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/4117
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 YearsEspondilodiscite Brucélica: Casuística dos Últimos 25 AnosIntroduction: Brucellosis is an endemic zoonosis in Portugal. Brucellar spondylodiscitis is one of the most frequent focal manifestations which may cause severe sequelae despite appropriate therapy.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with diagnosis of brucellar spondylodiscitis admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department of Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, over a 25-year period (1988-2012).Results: We identified 54 patients, 55.6% male, mean age of 54.8 years. In 81.5% an epidemiological context was identified, mostly contact with sheep and goats. The duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was 5.5 months. The most common signs and symptoms were pain (98.1%), fever (46.3%) and neurological deficits (25.9%). Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was the most used imaging method (77.8%) showing abscesses in 29.6% of patients. Lumbar location predominated (77.7%). Diagnosis was attained in 47 patients (87.0%): positive blood cultures (3 patients), positive serology (32 patients) or by both methods (12 patients). Combined regimens of doxycycline and rifampicin (64.8%), or streptomycin (24.1%) were most used, for an average duration of 4.4 months. A patient was referred for surgery for abscess drainage. Evolution was mostly favorable (92.6%), no deaths occurring.Discussion: Research of the epidemiologic context turned out to be a major key leading to the diagnosis. Treatment of osteoarticular brucellosis is still controversial.Conclusions: Brucellar spondylodiscitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with low back pain, even in the absence of fever, particularly in regions where the disease is endemic. Antibiotic regimen, its’ duration and the need for surgery should be individualized to achieve a better prognosis. Cases have declined over the years, a fact related to better control of animal endemic.Introdução: A brucelose é uma zoonose endémica em Portugal, sendo a espondilodiscite brucélica uma das manifestações focaismais frequentes. Pode provocar sequelas graves, apesar da terapêutica dirigida.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo dos processos dos doentes com espondilodiscite brucélica, internados no Serviço de Doenças Infecciosas do Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, num período de 25 anos (1988-2012).Resultados: Foram identificados 54 doentes, 55,6% do sexo masculino, com idade média de 54,8 anos. Em 81,5% identificou-se contexto epidemiológico, maioritariamente contacto com gado ovino e caprino. A duração da sintomatologia prévia ao diagnóstico foi de 5,5 meses. Os sinais e sintomas mais frequentes foram: dor (98,1%), febre (46,3%) e défices neurológicos (25,9%). A ressonância magnética nuclear da coluna foi o exame imagiológico mais usado (77,8%) evidenciando abcessos em 29,6% dos doentes. A localizaçãolombar predominou (77,7%). O diagnóstico etiológico foi confirmado em 47 doentes (87,0%): microbiologicamente (3 doentes), serologicamente (32 doentes) ou por ambos (12 doentes). As associações de doxiciclina com rifampicina (64,8%), ou estreptomicina (24,1%) foram as mais utilizadas, com duração média de 4,4 meses de tratamento. Um doente teve indicação cirúrgica para drenar abcesso. A evolução foi maioritariamente favorável (92,6%), sem óbitos.Discussão: A investigação de contexto epidemiológico revelou ser uma peça importante na suspeita do diagnóstico. O tratamento da brucelose osteoarticular ainda é controverso.Conclusões: A espondilodiscite brucélica deve ser considerada no diagnóstico diferencial dos doentes com lombalgia, mesmo naausência de febre, particularmente em regiões onde a doença é endémica. O esquema antibiótico, sua duração e a necessidade de cirurgia deverão ser individualizados, com vista a um melhor prognóstico. O número de casos tem diminuído ao longo dos anos, facto relacionado com melhor controlo da endemia animal.Ordem dos Médicos2014-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/jpegapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/4117Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2014): March-April; 204-210Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 2 (2014): Março-Abril; 204-2101646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/3952https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/4114https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6907https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6908https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6909https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6910https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6911https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6912https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6913https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6914https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7187https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7221https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7222https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7223Lebre, AnaVelez, JorgeSeixas, DianaRabadão, EduardoOliveira, JoaquimSaraiva da Cunha, J.Silvestre, A. Meliçoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:03:17Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/4117Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:18:42.142457Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
Espondilodiscite Brucélica: Casuística dos Últimos 25 Anos
title Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
spellingShingle Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
Lebre, Ana
title_short Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
title_full Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
title_fullStr Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
title_full_unstemmed Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
title_sort Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Case Series of the Last 25 Years
author Lebre, Ana
author_facet Lebre, Ana
Velez, Jorge
Seixas, Diana
Rabadão, Eduardo
Oliveira, Joaquim
Saraiva da Cunha, J.
Silvestre, A. Meliço
author_role author
author2 Velez, Jorge
Seixas, Diana
Rabadão, Eduardo
Oliveira, Joaquim
Saraiva da Cunha, J.
Silvestre, A. Meliço
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lebre, Ana
Velez, Jorge
Seixas, Diana
Rabadão, Eduardo
Oliveira, Joaquim
Saraiva da Cunha, J.
Silvestre, A. Meliço
description Introduction: Brucellosis is an endemic zoonosis in Portugal. Brucellar spondylodiscitis is one of the most frequent focal manifestations which may cause severe sequelae despite appropriate therapy.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of patients with diagnosis of brucellar spondylodiscitis admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department of Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, over a 25-year period (1988-2012).Results: We identified 54 patients, 55.6% male, mean age of 54.8 years. In 81.5% an epidemiological context was identified, mostly contact with sheep and goats. The duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis was 5.5 months. The most common signs and symptoms were pain (98.1%), fever (46.3%) and neurological deficits (25.9%). Spinal magnetic resonance imaging was the most used imaging method (77.8%) showing abscesses in 29.6% of patients. Lumbar location predominated (77.7%). Diagnosis was attained in 47 patients (87.0%): positive blood cultures (3 patients), positive serology (32 patients) or by both methods (12 patients). Combined regimens of doxycycline and rifampicin (64.8%), or streptomycin (24.1%) were most used, for an average duration of 4.4 months. A patient was referred for surgery for abscess drainage. Evolution was mostly favorable (92.6%), no deaths occurring.Discussion: Research of the epidemiologic context turned out to be a major key leading to the diagnosis. Treatment of osteoarticular brucellosis is still controversial.Conclusions: Brucellar spondylodiscitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with low back pain, even in the absence of fever, particularly in regions where the disease is endemic. Antibiotic regimen, its’ duration and the need for surgery should be individualized to achieve a better prognosis. Cases have declined over the years, a fact related to better control of animal endemic.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/4117
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/4117
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/3952
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/4114
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6907
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6908
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6909
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6910
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6911
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6912
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6913
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/6914
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7187
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7221
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7222
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/4117/7223
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
image/jpeg
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2014): March-April; 204-210
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 2 (2014): Março-Abril; 204-210
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130638454882304