Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.25758/set.884 |
Resumo: | The Bologna Process emphasizes university students’ communication skills, namely in the Health field. Teachers’ conceptions tend to vary with age and are important in the development of students’ conceptions. Aims – To analyse the importance and satisfaction that university teachers attribute to several communication skills and their relation with age. Methodology – A total of 79 university teachers, between 29 and 82 years of age (M=41.89; SD=9.99), mainly women (69.6%), answered a Sociodemographic Questionnaire and the Importance (IS) and Satisfaction Scales (SS) of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (QCC). Results – Between one and four of the participants attributed 11 of the 26 items of the IS and to 7 of the 26 items of the SS to the minimum score possible. There was also at least one participant that attributed the maximum score possible to all items of the IS (between eight and 51 participants) and of the SS (between six and 46 participants). The skill “thank” was considered the most important and satisfactory. Age was not statistically correlated with the items from the IS. There were linear statistically significant correlations between age and: “answer questions” (r(78)=.27, p£.02) and “ask for feedback in social interaction” (r(78)=.30, p£.008) from the SS. Since key skills for health professionals (e.g., “disagree”, “refuse requests”, “make requests”, and “paraphrase”) had scores that suggest low importance, it is considered important to change the importance perception of university teachers that does not seem to change with age. Important skills for the teachers’ work (e.g., “refuse requests”, “ask for a change in behaviour”) had some of the lowest satisfaction means, suggesting a need for training. |
id |
RCAP_53d12bc32dc4b32d179c0abdd4f33d61 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.ipl.pt:article/650 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachersImportância e satisfação atribuídas pelos professores universitários às competências comunicacionaisCompetências de comunicaçãoImportânciaSatisfaçãoProfessores universitáriosIdadeCommunication skillsImportanceSatisfactionUniversity teachersAgeThe Bologna Process emphasizes university students’ communication skills, namely in the Health field. Teachers’ conceptions tend to vary with age and are important in the development of students’ conceptions. Aims – To analyse the importance and satisfaction that university teachers attribute to several communication skills and their relation with age. Methodology – A total of 79 university teachers, between 29 and 82 years of age (M=41.89; SD=9.99), mainly women (69.6%), answered a Sociodemographic Questionnaire and the Importance (IS) and Satisfaction Scales (SS) of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (QCC). Results – Between one and four of the participants attributed 11 of the 26 items of the IS and to 7 of the 26 items of the SS to the minimum score possible. There was also at least one participant that attributed the maximum score possible to all items of the IS (between eight and 51 participants) and of the SS (between six and 46 participants). The skill “thank” was considered the most important and satisfactory. Age was not statistically correlated with the items from the IS. There were linear statistically significant correlations between age and: “answer questions” (r(78)=.27, p£.02) and “ask for feedback in social interaction” (r(78)=.30, p£.008) from the SS. Since key skills for health professionals (e.g., “disagree”, “refuse requests”, “make requests”, and “paraphrase”) had scores that suggest low importance, it is considered important to change the importance perception of university teachers that does not seem to change with age. Important skills for the teachers’ work (e.g., “refuse requests”, “ask for a change in behaviour”) had some of the lowest satisfaction means, suggesting a need for training.O Processo de Bolonha enfatiza as competências de comunicação dos estudantes universitários, nomeadamente os da saúde. As conceções dos professores tendem a variar com a idade e são importantes na formação das conceções dos alunos. Objetivos – Analisar a importância e a satisfação que professores universitários atribuem a diversas competências de comunicação e a sua relação com a idade. Metodologia – Foram avaliados 79 professores universitários, entre os 29 e os 82 anos (M=41,89; DP=9,99), maioritariamente do sexo feminino (69,6%), através de um Questionário Sóciodemográfico e das Escalas de Importância (EI) e Satisfação (ES) do Questionário de Competências de Comunicação (QCC). Resultados – Entre 1 a 4 participantes atribuíram a 11 dos 26 itens da EI e a 7 dos 26 itens da ES o menor valor possível. Houve também pelo menos um participante a atribuir o maior valor possível a todos os itens da EI (entre 8 a 51 participantes) e da ES (entre 6 a 46 participantes). A competência “agradecer” foi considerada a mais importante e satisfatória. A idade não se correlacionou com os itens da EI, correlacionando-se com “responder a perguntas” (r(78)=0,27, p£0,02) e “pedir feedback nas relações sociais” (r(78)=0,30, p£0,008) da ES. Dado que competências imprescindíveis aos profissionais de saúde obtiveram scores indicadores de baixa importância (e.g., “discordar”, “recusar pedidos”, “fazer pedidos”, “parafrasear”), considera-se importante trabalhar a perceção de importância dos professores universitários que não parece variar com a idade. Competências importantes para o trabalho do professor (e.g., “recusar pedidos”, “pedir mudança de comportamento”) obtiveram das médias de satisfação mais baixas, sugerindo necessidade de treino.Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa)2013-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.25758/set.884oai:journals.ipl.pt:article/650Saúde e Tecnologia; No. Suplemento (2013): Jornadas das Ciências Sociais e Humanas; e38-e42Saúde & Tecnologia; N.º Suplemento (2013): Jornadas das Ciências Sociais e Humanas; e38-e421646-9704reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/650https://doi.org/10.25758/set.884https://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/650/544Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Saúde & Tecnologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeneses, Rute F.Miyazaki, CristinaPais-Ribeiro, José2022-12-20T10:59:10Zoai:journals.ipl.pt:article/650Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:27.605152Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers Importância e satisfação atribuídas pelos professores universitários às competências comunicacionais |
title |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers |
spellingShingle |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers Meneses, Rute F. Competências de comunicação Importância Satisfação Professores universitários Idade Communication skills Importance Satisfaction University teachers Age |
title_short |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers |
title_full |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers |
title_fullStr |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers |
title_sort |
Importance and satisfaction attributed to communication skills by university teachers |
author |
Meneses, Rute F. |
author_facet |
Meneses, Rute F. Miyazaki, Cristina Pais-Ribeiro, José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miyazaki, Cristina Pais-Ribeiro, José |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Meneses, Rute F. Miyazaki, Cristina Pais-Ribeiro, José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Competências de comunicação Importância Satisfação Professores universitários Idade Communication skills Importance Satisfaction University teachers Age |
topic |
Competências de comunicação Importância Satisfação Professores universitários Idade Communication skills Importance Satisfaction University teachers Age |
description |
The Bologna Process emphasizes university students’ communication skills, namely in the Health field. Teachers’ conceptions tend to vary with age and are important in the development of students’ conceptions. Aims – To analyse the importance and satisfaction that university teachers attribute to several communication skills and their relation with age. Methodology – A total of 79 university teachers, between 29 and 82 years of age (M=41.89; SD=9.99), mainly women (69.6%), answered a Sociodemographic Questionnaire and the Importance (IS) and Satisfaction Scales (SS) of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (QCC). Results – Between one and four of the participants attributed 11 of the 26 items of the IS and to 7 of the 26 items of the SS to the minimum score possible. There was also at least one participant that attributed the maximum score possible to all items of the IS (between eight and 51 participants) and of the SS (between six and 46 participants). The skill “thank” was considered the most important and satisfactory. Age was not statistically correlated with the items from the IS. There were linear statistically significant correlations between age and: “answer questions” (r(78)=.27, p£.02) and “ask for feedback in social interaction” (r(78)=.30, p£.008) from the SS. Since key skills for health professionals (e.g., “disagree”, “refuse requests”, “make requests”, and “paraphrase”) had scores that suggest low importance, it is considered important to change the importance perception of university teachers that does not seem to change with age. Important skills for the teachers’ work (e.g., “refuse requests”, “ask for a change in behaviour”) had some of the lowest satisfaction means, suggesting a need for training. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.25758/set.884 oai:journals.ipl.pt:article/650 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.25758/set.884 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:journals.ipl.pt:article/650 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/650 https://doi.org/10.25758/set.884 https://journals.ipl.pt/stecnologia/article/view/650/544 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Saúde & Tecnologia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Saúde & Tecnologia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Lisboa (Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Saúde e Tecnologia; No. Suplemento (2013): Jornadas das Ciências Sociais e Humanas; e38-e42 Saúde & Tecnologia; N.º Suplemento (2013): Jornadas das Ciências Sociais e Humanas; e38-e42 1646-9704 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130661238341632 |