Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/17487 |
Resumo: | This study aims to provide evidence of validity and reliability of the Social Well-being Scales in the Portuguese context. A cross-sectional study was developed with 322 adults (M = 30.45; SD = 8.52) aged from 18 to 58 years old, mostly females (65.8%). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit considering the five-factor model consistent with the original theoretical proposal. Also, additional validity evidence was obtained with statistically significant associations being found between social well-being dimensions and satisfaction with life, depression and anxiety. Reliability data also showed adequate internal consistency of all well-being dimensions. This reliable and valid scale is useful to evaluate social well-being in adulthood in the Portuguese context, not only allowing a more comprehensive approach to the mental health research but also providing opportunities of assessment and intervention focused on a positive framework. |
id |
RCAP_54517a4dd69b3a274c408a8ed6b8c724 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/17487 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese contextAdulthoodMental healthPsychometricsSocial well-being scalesThis study aims to provide evidence of validity and reliability of the Social Well-being Scales in the Portuguese context. A cross-sectional study was developed with 322 adults (M = 30.45; SD = 8.52) aged from 18 to 58 years old, mostly females (65.8%). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit considering the five-factor model consistent with the original theoretical proposal. Also, additional validity evidence was obtained with statistically significant associations being found between social well-being dimensions and satisfaction with life, depression and anxiety. Reliability data also showed adequate internal consistency of all well-being dimensions. This reliable and valid scale is useful to evaluate social well-being in adulthood in the Portuguese context, not only allowing a more comprehensive approach to the mental health research but also providing opportunities of assessment and intervention focused on a positive framework.Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia2019-03-06T12:56:37Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z20182019-05-20T10:23:44Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/17487eng0874-204910.17575/rpsicol.v32i2.1334Lages, A.Magalhães, E.Antunes, C.Ferreira, C.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:45:33Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/17487Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:21:47.572992Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context |
title |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context |
spellingShingle |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context Lages, A. Adulthood Mental health Psychometrics Social well-being scales |
title_short |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context |
title_full |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context |
title_fullStr |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context |
title_sort |
Social well-being scales: validity and reliability evidence in the Portuguese context |
author |
Lages, A. |
author_facet |
Lages, A. Magalhães, E. Antunes, C. Ferreira, C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magalhães, E. Antunes, C. Ferreira, C. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lages, A. Magalhães, E. Antunes, C. Ferreira, C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adulthood Mental health Psychometrics Social well-being scales |
topic |
Adulthood Mental health Psychometrics Social well-being scales |
description |
This study aims to provide evidence of validity and reliability of the Social Well-being Scales in the Portuguese context. A cross-sectional study was developed with 322 adults (M = 30.45; SD = 8.52) aged from 18 to 58 years old, mostly females (65.8%). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit considering the five-factor model consistent with the original theoretical proposal. Also, additional validity evidence was obtained with statistically significant associations being found between social well-being dimensions and satisfaction with life, depression and anxiety. Reliability data also showed adequate internal consistency of all well-being dimensions. This reliable and valid scale is useful to evaluate social well-being in adulthood in the Portuguese context, not only allowing a more comprehensive approach to the mental health research but also providing opportunities of assessment and intervention focused on a positive framework. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z 2018 2019-03-06T12:56:37Z 2019-05-20T10:23:44Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/17487 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/17487 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0874-2049 10.17575/rpsicol.v32i2.1334 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Psicologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134779074936832 |