Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, Rosana
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Alves, Jorge, Thomas, Roger, Chiaravalloti, Nancy, Gonçalves, Óscar F., Petrosyan, Agavni, Sampaio, Adriana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40093
Resumo: Purpose: Fifty percent of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are estimated to have cognitive impairments leading to considerable decline in productivity and quality of life. Cognitive intervention has been considered to complement pharmacological treatments. However, a lack of agreement concerning the efficacy of cognitive interventions in MS still exists. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effects of cognitive interventions in MS. Methods: To overcome limitations of previous meta-analyses, several databases were searched only for Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias. Results: Five studies (total of 139 participants) met our eligibility criteria. Although good completion and adherence rates were evident, we found no evidence of intervention effects on cognition or mood in post-intervention or follow-up assessments. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis assessing the effects of cognitive intervention in MS including only RCTs with comparable conditions. Research regarding efficacy, cost-effectiveness and feasibility is still in its infancy. Caution is advised when interpreting these results due to the small number of RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria. Considering the costs of disease, good completion and adherence rates of this approach, further research is warranted. Recommendations concerning improved research practices in the field are presented as well.
id RCAP_55c41b6f84e0e10a8b2ff47776005d5c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/40093
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?Cognition disordersDatabases bibliographicFeasibility studiesHumansMultiple sclerosisRandomized controlled trials as topicfeasibilitymeta-analysisRehabilitationsystematic reviewScience & TechnologyPurpose: Fifty percent of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are estimated to have cognitive impairments leading to considerable decline in productivity and quality of life. Cognitive intervention has been considered to complement pharmacological treatments. However, a lack of agreement concerning the efficacy of cognitive interventions in MS still exists. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effects of cognitive interventions in MS. Methods: To overcome limitations of previous meta-analyses, several databases were searched only for Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias. Results: Five studies (total of 139 participants) met our eligibility criteria. Although good completion and adherence rates were evident, we found no evidence of intervention effects on cognition or mood in post-intervention or follow-up assessments. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis assessing the effects of cognitive intervention in MS including only RCTs with comparable conditions. Research regarding efficacy, cost-effectiveness and feasibility is still in its infancy. Caution is advised when interpreting these results due to the small number of RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria. Considering the costs of disease, good completion and adherence rates of this approach, further research is warranted. Recommendations concerning improved research practices in the field are presented as well.R.M. and J.A. are supported by doctoral Grants from Fundac¸ao para a Ci ˜ encia e Tecnologia (FCT) ˆ (SFRH/BD/65213/2009, SFRH/BD/64457/2009 and co-funded by FSE/POPH). A.S. is funded for the project PIC/IC/83290/2007, supported by FEDER (POFC–COMPETE) and FCT to develop and assess the effectiveness of a cognitive stimulation tool for Portuguese clinicians.IOS PressUniversidade do MinhoMagalhães, RosanaAlves, JorgeThomas, RogerChiaravalloti, NancyGonçalves, Óscar F.Petrosyan, AgavniSampaio, Adriana20142014-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/40093eng0922-602810.3233/RNN-14038825096974info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:12:31Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/40093Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:04:26.989158Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
title Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
spellingShingle Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
Magalhães, Rosana
Cognition disorders
Databases bibliographic
Feasibility studies
Humans
Multiple sclerosis
Randomized controlled trials as topic
feasibility
meta-analysis
Rehabilitation
systematic review
Science & Technology
title_short Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
title_full Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
title_fullStr Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
title_full_unstemmed Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
title_sort Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?
author Magalhães, Rosana
author_facet Magalhães, Rosana
Alves, Jorge
Thomas, Roger
Chiaravalloti, Nancy
Gonçalves, Óscar F.
Petrosyan, Agavni
Sampaio, Adriana
author_role author
author2 Alves, Jorge
Thomas, Roger
Chiaravalloti, Nancy
Gonçalves, Óscar F.
Petrosyan, Agavni
Sampaio, Adriana
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães, Rosana
Alves, Jorge
Thomas, Roger
Chiaravalloti, Nancy
Gonçalves, Óscar F.
Petrosyan, Agavni
Sampaio, Adriana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cognition disorders
Databases bibliographic
Feasibility studies
Humans
Multiple sclerosis
Randomized controlled trials as topic
feasibility
meta-analysis
Rehabilitation
systematic review
Science & Technology
topic Cognition disorders
Databases bibliographic
Feasibility studies
Humans
Multiple sclerosis
Randomized controlled trials as topic
feasibility
meta-analysis
Rehabilitation
systematic review
Science & Technology
description Purpose: Fifty percent of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are estimated to have cognitive impairments leading to considerable decline in productivity and quality of life. Cognitive intervention has been considered to complement pharmacological treatments. However, a lack of agreement concerning the efficacy of cognitive interventions in MS still exists. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effects of cognitive interventions in MS. Methods: To overcome limitations of previous meta-analyses, several databases were searched only for Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) with low risk of bias. Results: Five studies (total of 139 participants) met our eligibility criteria. Although good completion and adherence rates were evident, we found no evidence of intervention effects on cognition or mood in post-intervention or follow-up assessments. Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis assessing the effects of cognitive intervention in MS including only RCTs with comparable conditions. Research regarding efficacy, cost-effectiveness and feasibility is still in its infancy. Caution is advised when interpreting these results due to the small number of RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria. Considering the costs of disease, good completion and adherence rates of this approach, further research is warranted. Recommendations concerning improved research practices in the field are presented as well.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40093
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40093
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0922-6028
10.3233/RNN-140388
25096974
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IOS Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132453656330240