Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898 |
Resumo: | Introduction: There is a paucity of quantitative studies objectively comparing debriefing and feedback as methods for post-scenario discussion and its impact on healthcare teams’ acquisition and retention of non-technical skills. The main purpose of this study is to provide some insight on this research question, using a sample of medical students. A secondary objective explores students’ opinion and preference on the post-scenario discussion.Material and Methods: Forty-five medical students were distributed among 15 teams, and randomly allocated to two groups. Each team participated in three different simulated scenarios, with similar levels of difficulty and opportunities to apply specific non-technical skills: leadership, communication, and task management. To assess the acquisition and retention of skills, scenarios occurred on days one (baseline), two (acquisition) and 20 (retention). Team performance was objectively evaluated by an observer, using scenario recordings. Students individually assessed different aspects of debriefing and feedback.Results: Both debriefing and feedback groups showed similar overall increase in objective scores, with significant increase between days one and two (acquisition), and a smaller increase between days two and 20 (retention). Students indicated debriefing as the preferred discussion method.Conclusion: Debriefing and feedback are effective post-scenario discussion methods, promoting acquisition and retention of non-technical skills, by undergraduate students. Allying debriefing reflexive practice with feedback directive style, and shifting appropriately between facilitation and instruction, can be a good compromise to achieve a timely and educationally meaningful discussion. |
id |
RCAP_55e94a377d309c89fa92c1cf9f2c7d74 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/16898 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical SkillsDebriefing ou Feedback: Estudo Exploratório do Efeito de Dois Métodos de Discussão Pós-Cenário na Aquisição e Retenção de Competência Não-TécnicasClinical CompetenceFormative FeedbackPatient Care TeamSimulation TrainingStudentsMedicalCompetência ClínicaEquipas de Cuidados ao DoenteEstudantes de MedicinaFeedback FormativoSimulação RealísticaIntroduction: There is a paucity of quantitative studies objectively comparing debriefing and feedback as methods for post-scenario discussion and its impact on healthcare teams’ acquisition and retention of non-technical skills. The main purpose of this study is to provide some insight on this research question, using a sample of medical students. A secondary objective explores students’ opinion and preference on the post-scenario discussion.Material and Methods: Forty-five medical students were distributed among 15 teams, and randomly allocated to two groups. Each team participated in three different simulated scenarios, with similar levels of difficulty and opportunities to apply specific non-technical skills: leadership, communication, and task management. To assess the acquisition and retention of skills, scenarios occurred on days one (baseline), two (acquisition) and 20 (retention). Team performance was objectively evaluated by an observer, using scenario recordings. Students individually assessed different aspects of debriefing and feedback.Results: Both debriefing and feedback groups showed similar overall increase in objective scores, with significant increase between days one and two (acquisition), and a smaller increase between days two and 20 (retention). Students indicated debriefing as the preferred discussion method.Conclusion: Debriefing and feedback are effective post-scenario discussion methods, promoting acquisition and retention of non-technical skills, by undergraduate students. Allying debriefing reflexive practice with feedback directive style, and shifting appropriately between facilitation and instruction, can be a good compromise to achieve a timely and educationally meaningful discussion.Introdução: Há uma escassez de estudos quantitativos comparando objetivamente o debriefing e o feedback como métodos de discussão pós-cenário e o seu impacto na aquisição e retenção de competências não-técnicas pelas equipas de saúde. O objetivo principal deste estudo é explorar esta questão de investigação, usando uma amostra de estudantes de medicina. Adicionalmente, foi analisada a opinião e preferência dos estudantes sobre o método de discussão pós-cenário.Material e Métodos: Quarenta e cinco estudantes de medicina foram distribuídos em 15 equipas e alocados aleatoriamente a dois grupos. Cada equipa participou em três cenários de simulação diferentes, com níveis de dificuldade semelhantes e as mesmas oportunidades para aplicar as seguintes competências não-técnicas específicas: liderança, comunicação e gestão de tarefas. Para avaliar a aquisição e retenção de competências, os cenários decorreram nos dias um (linha de base), dois (aquisição) e 20 (retenção). O desempenho de cada equipa foi avaliado objetivamente por um observador, através da análise das gravações dos cenários e de uma checklist. Os estudantes foram ainda convidados a avaliar individualmente a condução do debriefing e do feedback.Resultados: Ambos os grupos (debriefing e feedback) demonstraram um incremento semelhante nas pontuações objetivas, com um aumento acentuado entre os dias um e dois (aquisição) e um aumento ligeiro entre os dias dois e 20 (retenção). Os estudantes indicaram o debriefing como método de discussão preferencial.Conclusão: O debriefing e o feedback são métodos eficazes de discussão pós-cenário, promovendo a aquisição e retenção de competências não-técnicas por estudantes pré-graduados. A aliança da prática reflexiva do debriefing com o estilo diretivo de feedback, alternando apropriadamente entre facilitação e instrução, é um compromisso aceitável para alcançar uma discussão educacionalmente significativa num tempo limitado.Ordem dos Médicos2022-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-41Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-411646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6681https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6682Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSá-Couto, CarlaRodrigues, DianaGouveia, Marcos2023-02-12T03:00:34Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/16898Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:50.464740Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills Debriefing ou Feedback: Estudo Exploratório do Efeito de Dois Métodos de Discussão Pós-Cenário na Aquisição e Retenção de Competência Não-Técnicas |
title |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills |
spellingShingle |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills Sá-Couto, Carla Clinical Competence Formative Feedback Patient Care Team Simulation Training Students Medical Competência Clínica Equipas de Cuidados ao Doente Estudantes de Medicina Feedback Formativo Simulação Realística |
title_short |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills |
title_full |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills |
title_fullStr |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills |
title_full_unstemmed |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills |
title_sort |
Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills |
author |
Sá-Couto, Carla |
author_facet |
Sá-Couto, Carla Rodrigues, Diana Gouveia, Marcos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues, Diana Gouveia, Marcos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sá-Couto, Carla Rodrigues, Diana Gouveia, Marcos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Competence Formative Feedback Patient Care Team Simulation Training Students Medical Competência Clínica Equipas de Cuidados ao Doente Estudantes de Medicina Feedback Formativo Simulação Realística |
topic |
Clinical Competence Formative Feedback Patient Care Team Simulation Training Students Medical Competência Clínica Equipas de Cuidados ao Doente Estudantes de Medicina Feedback Formativo Simulação Realística |
description |
Introduction: There is a paucity of quantitative studies objectively comparing debriefing and feedback as methods for post-scenario discussion and its impact on healthcare teams’ acquisition and retention of non-technical skills. The main purpose of this study is to provide some insight on this research question, using a sample of medical students. A secondary objective explores students’ opinion and preference on the post-scenario discussion.Material and Methods: Forty-five medical students were distributed among 15 teams, and randomly allocated to two groups. Each team participated in three different simulated scenarios, with similar levels of difficulty and opportunities to apply specific non-technical skills: leadership, communication, and task management. To assess the acquisition and retention of skills, scenarios occurred on days one (baseline), two (acquisition) and 20 (retention). Team performance was objectively evaluated by an observer, using scenario recordings. Students individually assessed different aspects of debriefing and feedback.Results: Both debriefing and feedback groups showed similar overall increase in objective scores, with significant increase between days one and two (acquisition), and a smaller increase between days two and 20 (retention). Students indicated debriefing as the preferred discussion method.Conclusion: Debriefing and feedback are effective post-scenario discussion methods, promoting acquisition and retention of non-technical skills, by undergraduate students. Allying debriefing reflexive practice with feedback directive style, and shifting appropriately between facilitation and instruction, can be a good compromise to achieve a timely and educationally meaningful discussion. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6681 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6682 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-41 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-41 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817552085554561024 |