Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sá-Couto, Carla
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Diana, Gouveia, Marcos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898
Resumo: Introduction: There is a paucity of quantitative studies objectively comparing debriefing and feedback as methods for post-scenario discussion and its impact on healthcare teams’ acquisition and retention of non-technical skills. The main purpose of this study is to provide some insight on this research question, using a sample of medical students. A secondary objective explores students’ opinion and preference on the post-scenario discussion.Material and Methods: Forty-five medical students were distributed among 15 teams, and randomly allocated to two groups. Each team participated in three different simulated scenarios, with similar levels of difficulty and opportunities to apply specific non-technical skills: leadership, communication, and task management. To assess the acquisition and retention of skills, scenarios occurred on days one (baseline), two (acquisition) and 20 (retention). Team performance was objectively evaluated by an observer, using scenario recordings. Students individually assessed different aspects of debriefing and feedback.Results: Both debriefing and feedback groups showed similar overall increase in objective scores, with significant increase between days one and two (acquisition), and a smaller increase between days two and 20 (retention). Students indicated debriefing as the preferred discussion method.Conclusion: Debriefing and feedback are effective post-scenario discussion methods, promoting acquisition and retention of non-technical skills, by undergraduate students. Allying debriefing reflexive practice with feedback directive style, and shifting appropriately between facilitation and instruction, can be a good compromise to achieve a timely and educationally meaningful discussion.
id RCAP_55e94a377d309c89fa92c1cf9f2c7d74
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/16898
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical SkillsDebriefing ou Feedback: Estudo Exploratório do Efeito de Dois Métodos de Discussão Pós-Cenário na Aquisição e Retenção de Competência Não-TécnicasClinical CompetenceFormative FeedbackPatient Care TeamSimulation TrainingStudentsMedicalCompetência ClínicaEquipas de Cuidados ao DoenteEstudantes de MedicinaFeedback FormativoSimulação RealísticaIntroduction: There is a paucity of quantitative studies objectively comparing debriefing and feedback as methods for post-scenario discussion and its impact on healthcare teams’ acquisition and retention of non-technical skills. The main purpose of this study is to provide some insight on this research question, using a sample of medical students. A secondary objective explores students’ opinion and preference on the post-scenario discussion.Material and Methods: Forty-five medical students were distributed among 15 teams, and randomly allocated to two groups. Each team participated in three different simulated scenarios, with similar levels of difficulty and opportunities to apply specific non-technical skills: leadership, communication, and task management. To assess the acquisition and retention of skills, scenarios occurred on days one (baseline), two (acquisition) and 20 (retention). Team performance was objectively evaluated by an observer, using scenario recordings. Students individually assessed different aspects of debriefing and feedback.Results: Both debriefing and feedback groups showed similar overall increase in objective scores, with significant increase between days one and two (acquisition), and a smaller increase between days two and 20 (retention). Students indicated debriefing as the preferred discussion method.Conclusion: Debriefing and feedback are effective post-scenario discussion methods, promoting acquisition and retention of non-technical skills, by undergraduate students. Allying debriefing reflexive practice with feedback directive style, and shifting appropriately between facilitation and instruction, can be a good compromise to achieve a timely and educationally meaningful discussion.Introdução: Há uma escassez de estudos quantitativos comparando objetivamente o debriefing e o feedback como métodos de discussão pós-cenário e o seu impacto na aquisição e retenção de competências não-técnicas pelas equipas de saúde. O objetivo principal deste estudo é explorar esta questão de investigação, usando uma amostra de estudantes de medicina. Adicionalmente, foi analisada a opinião e preferência dos estudantes sobre o método de discussão pós-cenário.Material e Métodos: Quarenta e cinco estudantes de medicina foram distribuídos em 15 equipas e alocados aleatoriamente a dois grupos. Cada equipa participou em três cenários de simulação diferentes, com níveis de dificuldade semelhantes e as mesmas oportunidades para aplicar as seguintes competências não-técnicas específicas: liderança, comunicação e gestão de tarefas. Para avaliar a aquisição e retenção de competências, os cenários decorreram nos dias um (linha de base), dois (aquisição) e 20 (retenção). O desempenho de cada equipa foi avaliado objetivamente por um observador, através da análise das gravações dos cenários e de uma checklist. Os estudantes foram ainda convidados a avaliar individualmente a condução do debriefing e do feedback.Resultados: Ambos os grupos (debriefing e feedback) demonstraram um incremento semelhante nas pontuações objetivas, com um aumento acentuado entre os dias um e dois (aquisição) e um aumento ligeiro entre os dias dois e 20 (retenção). Os estudantes indicaram o debriefing como método de discussão preferencial.Conclusão: O debriefing e o feedback são métodos eficazes de discussão pós-cenário, promovendo a aquisição e retenção de competências não-técnicas por estudantes pré-graduados. A aliança da prática reflexiva do debriefing com o estilo diretivo de feedback, alternando apropriadamente entre facilitação e instrução, é um compromisso aceitável para alcançar uma discussão educacionalmente significativa num tempo limitado.Ordem dos Médicos2022-06-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-41Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-411646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6681https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6682Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSá-Couto, CarlaRodrigues, DianaGouveia, Marcos2023-02-12T03:00:34Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/16898Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:50.464740Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
Debriefing ou Feedback: Estudo Exploratório do Efeito de Dois Métodos de Discussão Pós-Cenário na Aquisição e Retenção de Competência Não-Técnicas
title Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
spellingShingle Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
Sá-Couto, Carla
Clinical Competence
Formative Feedback
Patient Care Team
Simulation Training
Students
Medical
Competência Clínica
Equipas de Cuidados ao Doente
Estudantes de Medicina
Feedback Formativo
Simulação Realística
title_short Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
title_full Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
title_fullStr Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
title_full_unstemmed Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
title_sort Debriefing or Feedback: Exploring the Impact of Two Post-Scenario Discussion Methods in the Acquisition and Retention of Non-Technical Skills
author Sá-Couto, Carla
author_facet Sá-Couto, Carla
Rodrigues, Diana
Gouveia, Marcos
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Diana
Gouveia, Marcos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sá-Couto, Carla
Rodrigues, Diana
Gouveia, Marcos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clinical Competence
Formative Feedback
Patient Care Team
Simulation Training
Students
Medical
Competência Clínica
Equipas de Cuidados ao Doente
Estudantes de Medicina
Feedback Formativo
Simulação Realística
topic Clinical Competence
Formative Feedback
Patient Care Team
Simulation Training
Students
Medical
Competência Clínica
Equipas de Cuidados ao Doente
Estudantes de Medicina
Feedback Formativo
Simulação Realística
description Introduction: There is a paucity of quantitative studies objectively comparing debriefing and feedback as methods for post-scenario discussion and its impact on healthcare teams’ acquisition and retention of non-technical skills. The main purpose of this study is to provide some insight on this research question, using a sample of medical students. A secondary objective explores students’ opinion and preference on the post-scenario discussion.Material and Methods: Forty-five medical students were distributed among 15 teams, and randomly allocated to two groups. Each team participated in three different simulated scenarios, with similar levels of difficulty and opportunities to apply specific non-technical skills: leadership, communication, and task management. To assess the acquisition and retention of skills, scenarios occurred on days one (baseline), two (acquisition) and 20 (retention). Team performance was objectively evaluated by an observer, using scenario recordings. Students individually assessed different aspects of debriefing and feedback.Results: Both debriefing and feedback groups showed similar overall increase in objective scores, with significant increase between days one and two (acquisition), and a smaller increase between days two and 20 (retention). Students indicated debriefing as the preferred discussion method.Conclusion: Debriefing and feedback are effective post-scenario discussion methods, promoting acquisition and retention of non-technical skills, by undergraduate students. Allying debriefing reflexive practice with feedback directive style, and shifting appropriately between facilitation and instruction, can be a good compromise to achieve a timely and educationally meaningful discussion.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6681
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/16898/6682
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2022 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-41
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 N.º 1 (2023): Janeiro; 34-41
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130655986024448