The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schaaf, Marlene
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Quiring, Oliver
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6635
Resumo: The emergence of social networking sites offers protest movements new ways to mobilize for action and draw attention to their issues. However, relying on social media also creates challenges, as social media follow their own principles. If protest movements want to be visible in news feeds, they have to adapt to so-called social media logic, as originally postulated in mediatization research. The principles of social media have been conceptualized. However, there is a lack of empirical research on how political actors perceive and orient to this logic, how they learn about it, and the consequences for mobilization (i.e., communicating protest issues as well as taking protest action). As protest movements are an integral part of modern democracies, use social media somewhat intensively, and usually build on a fluid network structure that allows us to examine adaptation processes in greater detail, they are particularly suitable for addressing these questions. Semi-structured interviews with activists organizing protest actions or managing social media accounts from 29 movement organizations in Germany (N = 33) revealed that protest movements have internalized social media logic and paid attention to not only the design but also the timing of posts to suit algorithms. The protest organizations generally built on their experience with social media. The degree to which they followed these principles was based on available resources. Limits of this adaptation arose, for example, if sensitive or negative content rarely produced likes or, increasingly, personalization evoked a presumed hierarchy within the movements.
id RCAP_5629be74b21df7a1b8b65ca2fa20eb87
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6635
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logicactivism; mediatization; mobilization; protest movements; social mediaThe emergence of social networking sites offers protest movements new ways to mobilize for action and draw attention to their issues. However, relying on social media also creates challenges, as social media follow their own principles. If protest movements want to be visible in news feeds, they have to adapt to so-called social media logic, as originally postulated in mediatization research. The principles of social media have been conceptualized. However, there is a lack of empirical research on how political actors perceive and orient to this logic, how they learn about it, and the consequences for mobilization (i.e., communicating protest issues as well as taking protest action). As protest movements are an integral part of modern democracies, use social media somewhat intensively, and usually build on a fluid network structure that allows us to examine adaptation processes in greater detail, they are particularly suitable for addressing these questions. Semi-structured interviews with activists organizing protest actions or managing social media accounts from 29 movement organizations in Germany (N = 33) revealed that protest movements have internalized social media logic and paid attention to not only the design but also the timing of posts to suit algorithms. The protest organizations generally built on their experience with social media. The degree to which they followed these principles was based on available resources. Limits of this adaptation arose, for example, if sensitive or negative content rarely produced likes or, increasingly, personalization evoked a presumed hierarchy within the movements.Cogitatio Press2023-08-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6635https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6635Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): Social Media’s Role in Political and Societal Mobilization; 203-2132183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6635https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6635/6635https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/6635/3371Copyright (c) 2023 Marlene Schaaf, Oliver Quiringinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchaaf, MarleneQuiring, Oliver2023-08-03T17:45:31Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6635Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:26:13.940131Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
title The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
spellingShingle The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
Schaaf, Marlene
activism; mediatization; mobilization; protest movements; social media
title_short The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
title_full The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
title_fullStr The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
title_full_unstemmed The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
title_sort The Limits of Social Media Mobilization: How Protest Movements Adapt to Social Media Logic
author Schaaf, Marlene
author_facet Schaaf, Marlene
Quiring, Oliver
author_role author
author2 Quiring, Oliver
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schaaf, Marlene
Quiring, Oliver
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv activism; mediatization; mobilization; protest movements; social media
topic activism; mediatization; mobilization; protest movements; social media
description The emergence of social networking sites offers protest movements new ways to mobilize for action and draw attention to their issues. However, relying on social media also creates challenges, as social media follow their own principles. If protest movements want to be visible in news feeds, they have to adapt to so-called social media logic, as originally postulated in mediatization research. The principles of social media have been conceptualized. However, there is a lack of empirical research on how political actors perceive and orient to this logic, how they learn about it, and the consequences for mobilization (i.e., communicating protest issues as well as taking protest action). As protest movements are an integral part of modern democracies, use social media somewhat intensively, and usually build on a fluid network structure that allows us to examine adaptation processes in greater detail, they are particularly suitable for addressing these questions. Semi-structured interviews with activists organizing protest actions or managing social media accounts from 29 movement organizations in Germany (N = 33) revealed that protest movements have internalized social media logic and paid attention to not only the design but also the timing of posts to suit algorithms. The protest organizations generally built on their experience with social media. The degree to which they followed these principles was based on available resources. Limits of this adaptation arose, for example, if sensitive or negative content rarely produced likes or, increasingly, personalization evoked a presumed hierarchy within the movements.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-03
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6635
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6635
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i3.6635
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6635
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6635/6635
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/6635/3371
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Marlene Schaaf, Oliver Quiring
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Marlene Schaaf, Oliver Quiring
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 11, No 3 (2023): Social Media’s Role in Political and Societal Mobilization; 203-213
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133529867550720