Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Snegovaya, Maria
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3482
Resumo: In this study, I look at two types of political actors commonly described as ‘populist’ in literature—namely, rightwing populists and technocratic leaders like France’s Emmanuel Macron and the Czech Republic’s Andrej Babiš. While both types of political actors tend to emerge as a response to a decline in trust in established parties and adopt platforms with anti-establishment and monist elements, they also possess noticeably different qualities. Unlike rightwing populists, technocrats lack a distinctive ideological profile and tend to adopt more inclusive rhetoric by appealing to a broadly-defined community of people. When contrasted with supporters of rightwing populists, empirical analysis of supporters of Macron’s and Babiš’ parties shows that the two have few commonalities. Relatively few examples of such political leadership, the lack of a distinct ideological profile and the variation of their support bases suggest that one should use caution when conceptualizing technocratic populists as a distinct theoretical type.
id RCAP_564b0ea687fe95ff6e0e81f44875a137
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3482
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?nativism; populism; radical right; technocratsIn this study, I look at two types of political actors commonly described as ‘populist’ in literature—namely, rightwing populists and technocratic leaders like France’s Emmanuel Macron and the Czech Republic’s Andrej Babiš. While both types of political actors tend to emerge as a response to a decline in trust in established parties and adopt platforms with anti-establishment and monist elements, they also possess noticeably different qualities. Unlike rightwing populists, technocrats lack a distinctive ideological profile and tend to adopt more inclusive rhetoric by appealing to a broadly-defined community of people. When contrasted with supporters of rightwing populists, empirical analysis of supporters of Macron’s and Babiš’ parties shows that the two have few commonalities. Relatively few examples of such political leadership, the lack of a distinct ideological profile and the variation of their support bases suggest that one should use caution when conceptualizing technocratic populists as a distinct theoretical type.Cogitatio2020-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3482oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3482Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Varieties of Technocratic Populism around the World; 556-5672183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3482https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3482https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3482/3482https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/3482/1432Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Snegovayahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSnegovaya, Maria2022-12-22T15:16:10Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3482Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:16.265573Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
title Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
spellingShingle Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
Snegovaya, Maria
nativism; populism; radical right; technocrats
title_short Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
title_full Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
title_fullStr Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
title_full_unstemmed Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
title_sort Different Strokes for Different Folks: Who Votes for Technocratic Parties?
author Snegovaya, Maria
author_facet Snegovaya, Maria
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Snegovaya, Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv nativism; populism; radical right; technocrats
topic nativism; populism; radical right; technocrats
description In this study, I look at two types of political actors commonly described as ‘populist’ in literature—namely, rightwing populists and technocratic leaders like France’s Emmanuel Macron and the Czech Republic’s Andrej Babiš. While both types of political actors tend to emerge as a response to a decline in trust in established parties and adopt platforms with anti-establishment and monist elements, they also possess noticeably different qualities. Unlike rightwing populists, technocrats lack a distinctive ideological profile and tend to adopt more inclusive rhetoric by appealing to a broadly-defined community of people. When contrasted with supporters of rightwing populists, empirical analysis of supporters of Macron’s and Babiš’ parties shows that the two have few commonalities. Relatively few examples of such political leadership, the lack of a distinct ideological profile and the variation of their support bases suggest that one should use caution when conceptualizing technocratic populists as a distinct theoretical type.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-17
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3482
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3482
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3482
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3482
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3482
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3482
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3482/3482
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/3482/1432
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Snegovaya
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Snegovaya
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Varieties of Technocratic Populism around the World; 556-567
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130668727271424