What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kümpel, Anna Sophie
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Anter, Luise, Unkel, Julian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5310
Resumo: In recent years, much research has—more or less candidly—asked whether the use of social media platforms is “making us dumber” (Cacciatore et al., 2018). Likewise, discussions around constructs such as the news-finds-me perception or illusions of knowledge point to concerns about social media users being inadequately informed. This assessment of inadequacy, explicitly or implicitly, builds on the ideal of the informed citizen with a broad interest in current affairs who knows about all important societal issues. However, research has largely ignored what citizens themselves understand as “being informed.” Accordingly, this research project asks what people actually want to be informed about, which user characteristics predict different self-concepts of informedness, and how both of these aspects relate to feelings of being informed in the context of social media platforms. Based on a preregistered, national representative survey of German social media users (n = 1,091), we find that keeping up with news and political information is generally less important for people than staying informed about their personal interests and their social environment. However, feelings of being informed through social media are most strongly predicted by how suitable a given social media platform is perceived to be for keeping up-to-date with current affairs. This suggests that while information needs are diverse and related to different sociodemographic and personal characteristics, most people indeed seem to associate “being informed” with political information and news.
id RCAP_56f198a21d915c46e2ad90d5c119bfde
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5310
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informednessfeelings of being informed; information needs; self-concepts of informedness; social mediaIn recent years, much research has—more or less candidly—asked whether the use of social media platforms is “making us dumber” (Cacciatore et al., 2018). Likewise, discussions around constructs such as the news-finds-me perception or illusions of knowledge point to concerns about social media users being inadequately informed. This assessment of inadequacy, explicitly or implicitly, builds on the ideal of the informed citizen with a broad interest in current affairs who knows about all important societal issues. However, research has largely ignored what citizens themselves understand as “being informed.” Accordingly, this research project asks what people actually want to be informed about, which user characteristics predict different self-concepts of informedness, and how both of these aspects relate to feelings of being informed in the context of social media platforms. Based on a preregistered, national representative survey of German social media users (n = 1,091), we find that keeping up with news and political information is generally less important for people than staying informed about their personal interests and their social environment. However, feelings of being informed through social media are most strongly predicted by how suitable a given social media platform is perceived to be for keeping up-to-date with current affairs. This suggests that while information needs are diverse and related to different sociodemographic and personal characteristics, most people indeed seem to associate “being informed” with political information and news.Cogitatio2022-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5310oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5310Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies; 93-1032183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5310https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5310https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5310/5310Copyright (c) 2022 Anna Sophie Kümpel, Luise Anter, Julian Unkelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKümpel, Anna SophieAnter, LuiseUnkel, Julian2022-12-20T10:59:17Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5310Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:16.293599Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
title What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
spellingShingle What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
Kümpel, Anna Sophie
feelings of being informed; information needs; self-concepts of informedness; social media
title_short What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
title_full What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
title_fullStr What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
title_full_unstemmed What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
title_sort What Does “Being Informed” Mean? Assessing Social Media Users’ Self-Concepts of Informedness
author Kümpel, Anna Sophie
author_facet Kümpel, Anna Sophie
Anter, Luise
Unkel, Julian
author_role author
author2 Anter, Luise
Unkel, Julian
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kümpel, Anna Sophie
Anter, Luise
Unkel, Julian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv feelings of being informed; information needs; self-concepts of informedness; social media
topic feelings of being informed; information needs; self-concepts of informedness; social media
description In recent years, much research has—more or less candidly—asked whether the use of social media platforms is “making us dumber” (Cacciatore et al., 2018). Likewise, discussions around constructs such as the news-finds-me perception or illusions of knowledge point to concerns about social media users being inadequately informed. This assessment of inadequacy, explicitly or implicitly, builds on the ideal of the informed citizen with a broad interest in current affairs who knows about all important societal issues. However, research has largely ignored what citizens themselves understand as “being informed.” Accordingly, this research project asks what people actually want to be informed about, which user characteristics predict different self-concepts of informedness, and how both of these aspects relate to feelings of being informed in the context of social media platforms. Based on a preregistered, national representative survey of German social media users (n = 1,091), we find that keeping up with news and political information is generally less important for people than staying informed about their personal interests and their social environment. However, feelings of being informed through social media are most strongly predicted by how suitable a given social media platform is perceived to be for keeping up-to-date with current affairs. This suggests that while information needs are diverse and related to different sociodemographic and personal characteristics, most people indeed seem to associate “being informed” with political information and news.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5310
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5310
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5310
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5310
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5310
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5310
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5310/5310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Anna Sophie Kümpel, Luise Anter, Julian Unkel
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Anna Sophie Kümpel, Luise Anter, Julian Unkel
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies; 93-103
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130659531259904