Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3175 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to develop a structural equation model for underwater gliding distance based in its determinant variables. Twenty three subjects (twelve boys and eleven girls with a mean age of 13.61 ± 0.83 years old) were evaluated. It were assesseddetermined: (i) the underwater gliding distance; (ii) the Squat Jump performance; (iii) the passive drag; (iv) the passive drag coefficient; (v) the trunk transverse surface area and; (vi) the gliding velocity. Underwater gliding distance was significantly correlated with Squat Jump (rs = 0.43; p = 0.038) and with passive drag (rs = 0.18; p = 0.402). Overall model explained 30% of the underwater gliding distance (x2 =26.946; x2/df = 3.849; SRMR = 0.207). As a conclusion, there are some other variables not considered for this model that might have significant influence in the underwater gliding distance. In this sense, it seems that the underwater gliding test it is not representative of the swimmer's passive drag nor his/her coefficient of passive drag. |
id |
RCAP_5765371aec056cf53bff0c90789222ac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bdigital.ipg.pt:10314/3175 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag?The aim of this study was to develop a structural equation model for underwater gliding distance based in its determinant variables. Twenty three subjects (twelve boys and eleven girls with a mean age of 13.61 ± 0.83 years old) were evaluated. It were assesseddetermined: (i) the underwater gliding distance; (ii) the Squat Jump performance; (iii) the passive drag; (iv) the passive drag coefficient; (v) the trunk transverse surface area and; (vi) the gliding velocity. Underwater gliding distance was significantly correlated with Squat Jump (rs = 0.43; p = 0.038) and with passive drag (rs = 0.18; p = 0.402). Overall model explained 30% of the underwater gliding distance (x2 =26.946; x2/df = 3.849; SRMR = 0.207). As a conclusion, there are some other variables not considered for this model that might have significant influence in the underwater gliding distance. In this sense, it seems that the underwater gliding test it is not representative of the swimmer's passive drag nor his/her coefficient of passive drag.International SportMed Journal2016-11-17T00:04:05Z2016-11-172013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10314/3175http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3175engMorais, JorgeCosta, MárioJesus, SandroMejias, JeanMoreira, MarcGarrido, NunoSilva, AntónioMarinho, DanielBarbosa, Tiagoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-14T02:56:37Zoai:bdigital.ipg.pt:10314/3175Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:42:34.295095Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? |
title |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? |
spellingShingle |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? Morais, Jorge |
title_short |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? |
title_full |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? |
title_fullStr |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? |
title_sort |
Is underwater gliding test a valid procedure to estimate the swimmers’ drag? |
author |
Morais, Jorge |
author_facet |
Morais, Jorge Costa, Mário Jesus, Sandro Mejias, Jean Moreira, Marc Garrido, Nuno Silva, António Marinho, Daniel Barbosa, Tiago |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Mário Jesus, Sandro Mejias, Jean Moreira, Marc Garrido, Nuno Silva, António Marinho, Daniel Barbosa, Tiago |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morais, Jorge Costa, Mário Jesus, Sandro Mejias, Jean Moreira, Marc Garrido, Nuno Silva, António Marinho, Daniel Barbosa, Tiago |
description |
The aim of this study was to develop a structural equation model for underwater gliding distance based in its determinant variables. Twenty three subjects (twelve boys and eleven girls with a mean age of 13.61 ± 0.83 years old) were evaluated. It were assesseddetermined: (i) the underwater gliding distance; (ii) the Squat Jump performance; (iii) the passive drag; (iv) the passive drag coefficient; (v) the trunk transverse surface area and; (vi) the gliding velocity. Underwater gliding distance was significantly correlated with Squat Jump (rs = 0.43; p = 0.038) and with passive drag (rs = 0.18; p = 0.402). Overall model explained 30% of the underwater gliding distance (x2 =26.946; x2/df = 3.849; SRMR = 0.207). As a conclusion, there are some other variables not considered for this model that might have significant influence in the underwater gliding distance. In this sense, it seems that the underwater gliding test it is not representative of the swimmer's passive drag nor his/her coefficient of passive drag. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z 2016-11-17T00:04:05Z 2016-11-17 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3175 http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3175 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10314/3175 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International SportMed Journal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
International SportMed Journal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136919072800768 |