Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29486 |
Resumo: | This article is motivated by the recognition of existing gaps between most common participatory practices and the hopes of participatory governance materialisation. Beyond normative mismatches, tangible gaps exist regarding the prospects and the effective results of participation, but also those resulting from the way citizens and civil society perceptions become misaligned with those of local public authorities. Thus, the paper ponders the tension between the heavy legacies of traditional forms of political action and policy delivery, embedded in modernist and sectorial structures of public administration, and the emergence of new demands originated by innovative programmatic layouts and new social movements agendas and citizenship cultures, all accompanied by growingly pressing societal challenges. The correspondent theoretical debates recover the issues of co-creation and co-production (Albrechts, 2013, Watson, 2014, Wamsler, 2016), and the way they have been confronting traditional forms of participation, hence also considering the role of civic initiatives in the reconfiguration of the public sphere (Fung & Wright, 2008, Seixas & Mota, 2021). This debate is triggered by the notion that innovative participative practices are permeating local governance practices unevenly, leading to fragmented effects of positive contamination of the more traditional ones, as has been recognized for the Portuguese situation (Seixas & Guterres, 2019, Falanga & Ferrão, 2021, Rio Fernandes et al, 2021). The article organizes relevant empirical information regarding diverse examples of innovation in local participatory practices in Portugal. The main goal of the research is to bring further observation and interpretation for the possible evolution – including its unbalances and gaps (of dialogue) between traditional and innovative forms of governance, participation over co-creation, in addition to the bridging routes that have been explored. The purpose is to identify productive lines of coalescence between the different agents and spaces, thus contributing to position more stable and permanent arrangements within the Portuguese local governance systems. |
id |
RCAP_57b7556ac477377041d313209ba54640 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29486 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory studyParticipationCo-creationCo-productionCivic movementsThis article is motivated by the recognition of existing gaps between most common participatory practices and the hopes of participatory governance materialisation. Beyond normative mismatches, tangible gaps exist regarding the prospects and the effective results of participation, but also those resulting from the way citizens and civil society perceptions become misaligned with those of local public authorities. Thus, the paper ponders the tension between the heavy legacies of traditional forms of political action and policy delivery, embedded in modernist and sectorial structures of public administration, and the emergence of new demands originated by innovative programmatic layouts and new social movements agendas and citizenship cultures, all accompanied by growingly pressing societal challenges. The correspondent theoretical debates recover the issues of co-creation and co-production (Albrechts, 2013, Watson, 2014, Wamsler, 2016), and the way they have been confronting traditional forms of participation, hence also considering the role of civic initiatives in the reconfiguration of the public sphere (Fung & Wright, 2008, Seixas & Mota, 2021). This debate is triggered by the notion that innovative participative practices are permeating local governance practices unevenly, leading to fragmented effects of positive contamination of the more traditional ones, as has been recognized for the Portuguese situation (Seixas & Guterres, 2019, Falanga & Ferrão, 2021, Rio Fernandes et al, 2021). The article organizes relevant empirical information regarding diverse examples of innovation in local participatory practices in Portugal. The main goal of the research is to bring further observation and interpretation for the possible evolution – including its unbalances and gaps (of dialogue) between traditional and innovative forms of governance, participation over co-creation, in addition to the bridging routes that have been explored. The purpose is to identify productive lines of coalescence between the different agents and spaces, thus contributing to position more stable and permanent arrangements within the Portuguese local governance systems.AESOP2023-10-30T11:03:19Z2023-01-01T00:00:00Z20232023-10-30T11:01:39Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/29486eng20.500.14235/375Nogueira, F.Seixas, J.Mota, J.Rusconi, I.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T03:33:04Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/29486Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-07-07T03:33:04Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study |
title |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study |
spellingShingle |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study Nogueira, F. Participation Co-creation Co-production Civic movements |
title_short |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study |
title_full |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study |
title_fullStr |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study |
title_sort |
Bringing participation closer to local governance expectations in Portugal: An exploratory study |
author |
Nogueira, F. |
author_facet |
Nogueira, F. Seixas, J. Mota, J. Rusconi, I. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Seixas, J. Mota, J. Rusconi, I. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nogueira, F. Seixas, J. Mota, J. Rusconi, I. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Participation Co-creation Co-production Civic movements |
topic |
Participation Co-creation Co-production Civic movements |
description |
This article is motivated by the recognition of existing gaps between most common participatory practices and the hopes of participatory governance materialisation. Beyond normative mismatches, tangible gaps exist regarding the prospects and the effective results of participation, but also those resulting from the way citizens and civil society perceptions become misaligned with those of local public authorities. Thus, the paper ponders the tension between the heavy legacies of traditional forms of political action and policy delivery, embedded in modernist and sectorial structures of public administration, and the emergence of new demands originated by innovative programmatic layouts and new social movements agendas and citizenship cultures, all accompanied by growingly pressing societal challenges. The correspondent theoretical debates recover the issues of co-creation and co-production (Albrechts, 2013, Watson, 2014, Wamsler, 2016), and the way they have been confronting traditional forms of participation, hence also considering the role of civic initiatives in the reconfiguration of the public sphere (Fung & Wright, 2008, Seixas & Mota, 2021). This debate is triggered by the notion that innovative participative practices are permeating local governance practices unevenly, leading to fragmented effects of positive contamination of the more traditional ones, as has been recognized for the Portuguese situation (Seixas & Guterres, 2019, Falanga & Ferrão, 2021, Rio Fernandes et al, 2021). The article organizes relevant empirical information regarding diverse examples of innovation in local participatory practices in Portugal. The main goal of the research is to bring further observation and interpretation for the possible evolution – including its unbalances and gaps (of dialogue) between traditional and innovative forms of governance, participation over co-creation, in addition to the bridging routes that have been explored. The purpose is to identify productive lines of coalescence between the different agents and spaces, thus contributing to position more stable and permanent arrangements within the Portuguese local governance systems. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-30T11:03:19Z 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z 2023 2023-10-30T11:01:39Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29486 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/29486 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
20.500.14235/375 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
AESOP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
AESOP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817546499019505664 |