Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672012000200011 |
Resumo: | This study examines Ernest Gellners nationalism theory and the problems that arise when applying it to the socio-political contemporary reality. Section I examines the general aspects of Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism, focusing particularly on the development of the relationship between culture and power, and the resulting entropy. I examine the main features stressed by Gellner: division of labour's role, the bureaucracy or institutionalization, education related to the States culture, and the settlement of the nation-state. Section II presents the most relevant elements of post-industrial society: individualization, institutionalization of individuality and the collapse of nation states. Section III points out the current issues Gellner's approach fails to address. This papers aim is to identify these issues, and to answer two questions: Is Gellners approach able to explain current nationalist movements? Is the Industrialization-Modernism-Nationalism triangle still applicable in our times? The paper concludes that Gellner's explanation of the origin of nationalism might be successful, but he fails to explain its role in the socio-political contemporary scene. |
id |
RCAP_590cc0953ad728b9509766f0344d1300 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0807-89672012000200011 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticismNationCultureFunctionalismModernityPost-Industrial SocietyThis study examines Ernest Gellners nationalism theory and the problems that arise when applying it to the socio-political contemporary reality. Section I examines the general aspects of Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism, focusing particularly on the development of the relationship between culture and power, and the resulting entropy. I examine the main features stressed by Gellner: division of labour's role, the bureaucracy or institutionalization, education related to the States culture, and the settlement of the nation-state. Section II presents the most relevant elements of post-industrial society: individualization, institutionalization of individuality and the collapse of nation states. Section III points out the current issues Gellner's approach fails to address. This papers aim is to identify these issues, and to answer two questions: Is Gellners approach able to explain current nationalist movements? Is the Industrialization-Modernism-Nationalism triangle still applicable in our times? The paper concludes that Gellner's explanation of the origin of nationalism might be successful, but he fails to explain its role in the socio-political contemporary scene.Centro de Estudos Humanísticos da Universidade do Minho2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672012000200011Revista Diacrítica v.26 n.2 2012reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672012000200011Lopez,Ander Errastiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T16:58:26Zoai:scielo:S0807-89672012000200011Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:15:11.197182Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism |
title |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism |
spellingShingle |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism Lopez,Ander Errasti Nation Culture Functionalism Modernity Post-Industrial Society |
title_short |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism |
title_full |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism |
title_fullStr |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism |
title_sort |
Ernest Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism: a criticism |
author |
Lopez,Ander Errasti |
author_facet |
Lopez,Ander Errasti |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopez,Ander Errasti |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nation Culture Functionalism Modernity Post-Industrial Society |
topic |
Nation Culture Functionalism Modernity Post-Industrial Society |
description |
This study examines Ernest Gellners nationalism theory and the problems that arise when applying it to the socio-political contemporary reality. Section I examines the general aspects of Gellner's functionalist approach to nationalism, focusing particularly on the development of the relationship between culture and power, and the resulting entropy. I examine the main features stressed by Gellner: division of labour's role, the bureaucracy or institutionalization, education related to the States culture, and the settlement of the nation-state. Section II presents the most relevant elements of post-industrial society: individualization, institutionalization of individuality and the collapse of nation states. Section III points out the current issues Gellner's approach fails to address. This papers aim is to identify these issues, and to answer two questions: Is Gellners approach able to explain current nationalist movements? Is the Industrialization-Modernism-Nationalism triangle still applicable in our times? The paper concludes that Gellner's explanation of the origin of nationalism might be successful, but he fails to explain its role in the socio-political contemporary scene. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672012000200011 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672012000200011 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672012000200011 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Humanísticos da Universidade do Minho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Estudos Humanísticos da Universidade do Minho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Diacrítica v.26 n.2 2012 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137252315496448 |