The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Paz Arencibia, Lázaro de la, Buzzichelli, Carlo, Miranda-Oliveira, Paulo, Fernandes, Orlando, Santos, Amândio, Rama, Luís
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106792
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134724
Resumo: The devices for measuring plyometric exercise in field conditions are becoming increasingly prevalent in applied research and practice. However, before the use of a device in an applied setting, the validity and reliability of such an instrument must be determined. The study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Output Sport, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), through comparisons with a force plate for research purposes. A repeated measure test-retest study was performed. Reliability was assessed during single-session trials (i.e., intrasession reliability). A total of 34 national/university level athletes (13 females, 21 males) performed three drop jumps with a fall from 30 cm while both devices recorded ground contact time (GCT), flight time (FT), jump height (HJ), and reactive strength index (RSI). T-tests demonstrated that data collected from the IMU device were significantly different to the force platform for all reported variables (all p < 0.01). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) demonstrated goodto-excellent reliability, but with a large range of confidence intervals (CI 95%) for GCT (0.825, 0.291–0.930), FT (0.928, 0.756–0.958), HJ (0.921, 0.773–0.964), and RSI (0.772, 0.151–0.907). The Bland-Altman test showed that the device overestimated contact times and underestimated the other variables. Upon landing, greater ground contact times (i.e., ≥0.355ms) were associated with higher reliability. These results suggest that a single IMU can be used to track changes somewhat accurately and reliably in jump metrics, especially when the GCT is greater than 0.355ms. It is recommended that before practitioners and trainers use the device as a cost-effective solution in the field, further research should be carried out to evaluate a range of data on the type of exercise to be performed.
id RCAP_5a03c60a21c2a83f13330cea1e157369
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106792
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jumpaccelerometerjump heightground contact timeflight time calculationreactive strength indexinertial measurement unitplyometric exerciseThe devices for measuring plyometric exercise in field conditions are becoming increasingly prevalent in applied research and practice. However, before the use of a device in an applied setting, the validity and reliability of such an instrument must be determined. The study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Output Sport, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), through comparisons with a force plate for research purposes. A repeated measure test-retest study was performed. Reliability was assessed during single-session trials (i.e., intrasession reliability). A total of 34 national/university level athletes (13 females, 21 males) performed three drop jumps with a fall from 30 cm while both devices recorded ground contact time (GCT), flight time (FT), jump height (HJ), and reactive strength index (RSI). T-tests demonstrated that data collected from the IMU device were significantly different to the force platform for all reported variables (all p < 0.01). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) demonstrated goodto-excellent reliability, but with a large range of confidence intervals (CI 95%) for GCT (0.825, 0.291–0.930), FT (0.928, 0.756–0.958), HJ (0.921, 0.773–0.964), and RSI (0.772, 0.151–0.907). The Bland-Altman test showed that the device overestimated contact times and underestimated the other variables. Upon landing, greater ground contact times (i.e., ≥0.355ms) were associated with higher reliability. These results suggest that a single IMU can be used to track changes somewhat accurately and reliably in jump metrics, especially when the GCT is greater than 0.355ms. It is recommended that before practitioners and trainers use the device as a cost-effective solution in the field, further research should be carried out to evaluate a range of data on the type of exercise to be performed.1218-2F4F-CC9E | Raynier Montoro-BombúN/A2022-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/106792http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106792https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134724eng2-s2.0-85132426753cv-prod-3111305Montoro-Bombú, RaynierPaz Arencibia, Lázaro de laBuzzichelli, CarloMiranda-Oliveira, PauloFernandes, OrlandoSantos, AmândioRama, Luísinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-05-08T13:53:07Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/106792Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:23:11.614641Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
title The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
spellingShingle The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
accelerometer
jump height
ground contact time
flight time calculation
reactive strength index
inertial measurement unit
plyometric exercise
title_short The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
title_full The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
title_fullStr The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
title_full_unstemmed The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
title_sort The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 on the Reactive Strength Index Assessment in Drop Jump
author Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
author_facet Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
Paz Arencibia, Lázaro de la
Buzzichelli, Carlo
Miranda-Oliveira, Paulo
Fernandes, Orlando
Santos, Amândio
Rama, Luís
author_role author
author2 Paz Arencibia, Lázaro de la
Buzzichelli, Carlo
Miranda-Oliveira, Paulo
Fernandes, Orlando
Santos, Amândio
Rama, Luís
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Montoro-Bombú, Raynier
Paz Arencibia, Lázaro de la
Buzzichelli, Carlo
Miranda-Oliveira, Paulo
Fernandes, Orlando
Santos, Amândio
Rama, Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv accelerometer
jump height
ground contact time
flight time calculation
reactive strength index
inertial measurement unit
plyometric exercise
topic accelerometer
jump height
ground contact time
flight time calculation
reactive strength index
inertial measurement unit
plyometric exercise
description The devices for measuring plyometric exercise in field conditions are becoming increasingly prevalent in applied research and practice. However, before the use of a device in an applied setting, the validity and reliability of such an instrument must be determined. The study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Output Sport, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), through comparisons with a force plate for research purposes. A repeated measure test-retest study was performed. Reliability was assessed during single-session trials (i.e., intrasession reliability). A total of 34 national/university level athletes (13 females, 21 males) performed three drop jumps with a fall from 30 cm while both devices recorded ground contact time (GCT), flight time (FT), jump height (HJ), and reactive strength index (RSI). T-tests demonstrated that data collected from the IMU device were significantly different to the force platform for all reported variables (all p < 0.01). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) demonstrated goodto-excellent reliability, but with a large range of confidence intervals (CI 95%) for GCT (0.825, 0.291–0.930), FT (0.928, 0.756–0.958), HJ (0.921, 0.773–0.964), and RSI (0.772, 0.151–0.907). The Bland-Altman test showed that the device overestimated contact times and underestimated the other variables. Upon landing, greater ground contact times (i.e., ≥0.355ms) were associated with higher reliability. These results suggest that a single IMU can be used to track changes somewhat accurately and reliably in jump metrics, especially when the GCT is greater than 0.355ms. It is recommended that before practitioners and trainers use the device as a cost-effective solution in the field, further research should be carried out to evaluate a range of data on the type of exercise to be performed.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-22
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106792
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106792
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134724
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/106792
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134724
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85132426753
cv-prod-3111305
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134119525875712