A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2017000100002 |
Resumo: | The authors criticize the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence of crisis on the main ground that it articulates the relationship between EU law and internal constitutional law in such a manner as to deny any possible conflict and need for reconciliation. This “autarchic” approach to EU Law suffers from two main flaws. First of all, it can only be achieved by construing EU Law obligations as purely obligations of result, leaving the Member states free to determine how the result is to be achieved. However, a strict separation between objectives and means is methodological inconsistent and, furthermore, it is simply incorrect to state that EU Law only imposes objectives and goals. Second, the Court appears oblivious to the composite, plural, discursive, multi-level nature of the EU legal order. This strategy can only lead to disempower national institutions (notably the Constitutional Court) in shaping of European integration. |
id |
RCAP_5a24a697538e1d5bb7c333c9aab7eae8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2183-184X2017000100002 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in ContextEU LawStability and Growth PactEuropean economic governance systemPortuguese Constitutional CourtEuropean Court of JusticeJurisprudence of CrisisThe authors criticize the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence of crisis on the main ground that it articulates the relationship between EU law and internal constitutional law in such a manner as to deny any possible conflict and need for reconciliation. This “autarchic” approach to EU Law suffers from two main flaws. First of all, it can only be achieved by construing EU Law obligations as purely obligations of result, leaving the Member states free to determine how the result is to be achieved. However, a strict separation between objectives and means is methodological inconsistent and, furthermore, it is simply incorrect to state that EU Law only imposes objectives and goals. Second, the Court appears oblivious to the composite, plural, discursive, multi-level nature of the EU legal order. This strategy can only lead to disempower national institutions (notably the Constitutional Court) in shaping of European integration.Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)2017-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2017000100002e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.4 n.1 2017reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2017000100002Maduro,Miguel PoiaresPierdominici,LeonardoFrada,Antónioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:29:43Zoai:scielo:S2183-184X2017000100002Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:33:32.684371Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context |
title |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context |
spellingShingle |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context Maduro,Miguel Poiares EU Law Stability and Growth Pact European economic governance system Portuguese Constitutional Court European Court of Justice Jurisprudence of Crisis |
title_short |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context |
title_full |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context |
title_fullStr |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context |
title_sort |
A Crisis between Crises: Placing the Portuguese Constitutional Jurisprudence of Crisis in Context |
author |
Maduro,Miguel Poiares |
author_facet |
Maduro,Miguel Poiares Pierdominici,Leonardo Frada,António |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pierdominici,Leonardo Frada,António |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maduro,Miguel Poiares Pierdominici,Leonardo Frada,António |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
EU Law Stability and Growth Pact European economic governance system Portuguese Constitutional Court European Court of Justice Jurisprudence of Crisis |
topic |
EU Law Stability and Growth Pact European economic governance system Portuguese Constitutional Court European Court of Justice Jurisprudence of Crisis |
description |
The authors criticize the Constitutional Court's jurisprudence of crisis on the main ground that it articulates the relationship between EU law and internal constitutional law in such a manner as to deny any possible conflict and need for reconciliation. This “autarchic” approach to EU Law suffers from two main flaws. First of all, it can only be achieved by construing EU Law obligations as purely obligations of result, leaving the Member states free to determine how the result is to be achieved. However, a strict separation between objectives and means is methodological inconsistent and, furthermore, it is simply incorrect to state that EU Law only imposes objectives and goals. Second, the Court appears oblivious to the composite, plural, discursive, multi-level nature of the EU legal order. This strategy can only lead to disempower national institutions (notably the Constitutional Court) in shaping of European integration. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2017000100002 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2017000100002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2017000100002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.4 n.1 2017 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137394053611520 |