Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.205 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Renal trauma accounts for about 1% to 5% of all trauma patients, the majority of which are due to blunt trauma. Based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification we can classify renal trauma into five grades of injury, which can help choosing the adequate treatment and anticipate the outcome. Management of renal trauma is evolving to a more conservative approach, avoiding surgery when it is possible.Our objective was to analyse our 5-year experience of renal trauma at a level 1 trauma center and report the patterns of injury, management and complications. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with renal trauma at a level 1 trauma center between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were collected from electronic patient records. Results: During this period of time, we identified 29 patients, 93.1% male, admitted due to renal trauma. Median age was 48 years old. The majority had a blunt trauma (89.7%). The distribution of injury grade according to the AAST classification was: 6.9% grade I, 13.8% grade II, 41.4% grade III, 31% grade IV and 6.9% grade V. No patient died due to this trauma. A percentage of 43.3% of patients were treated conservatively, 6.7% with embolization by interventional radiology, 30.0% with a double J ureteral stent and 20.0% with nephrectomy. Early complications were observed in 34.4% of the patients. Conclusion: The vast majority of renal injuries were due to blunt trauma, as expected. At this moment, management of renal trauma is trending to a more conservative approach, but in our sample, half of the patients needed intervention, mainly due to urinary extravasation but also because active bleeding and unfavourable clinical evolution. Nephrectomies were performed almost exclusively in grade 4 or 5 of injury. Early complications were more frequent than expected, mainly due to infection, in spite of empiric antibiotic therapy have been done in all patients. |
id |
RCAP_5aac00ae005fe4f06ad01b76119e4366 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/205 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma CenterTraumatismo Renal: Análise Retrospetiva de 5 Anos de um Centro de Trauma de Nível 1Rim/lesõesKidney/injuriesIntroduction: Renal trauma accounts for about 1% to 5% of all trauma patients, the majority of which are due to blunt trauma. Based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification we can classify renal trauma into five grades of injury, which can help choosing the adequate treatment and anticipate the outcome. Management of renal trauma is evolving to a more conservative approach, avoiding surgery when it is possible.Our objective was to analyse our 5-year experience of renal trauma at a level 1 trauma center and report the patterns of injury, management and complications. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with renal trauma at a level 1 trauma center between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were collected from electronic patient records. Results: During this period of time, we identified 29 patients, 93.1% male, admitted due to renal trauma. Median age was 48 years old. The majority had a blunt trauma (89.7%). The distribution of injury grade according to the AAST classification was: 6.9% grade I, 13.8% grade II, 41.4% grade III, 31% grade IV and 6.9% grade V. No patient died due to this trauma. A percentage of 43.3% of patients were treated conservatively, 6.7% with embolization by interventional radiology, 30.0% with a double J ureteral stent and 20.0% with nephrectomy. Early complications were observed in 34.4% of the patients. Conclusion: The vast majority of renal injuries were due to blunt trauma, as expected. At this moment, management of renal trauma is trending to a more conservative approach, but in our sample, half of the patients needed intervention, mainly due to urinary extravasation but also because active bleeding and unfavourable clinical evolution. Nephrectomies were performed almost exclusively in grade 4 or 5 of injury. Early complications were more frequent than expected, mainly due to infection, in spite of empiric antibiotic therapy have been done in all patients.Introdução: O trauma renal compreende entre 1% a 5% de todos os doentes de trauma, a maioria por trauma contuso. Baseada na classificação da American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), podemos classificar o trauma renal em 5 graus, o que ajuda a escolher o melhor tratamento e a prever o desfecho de cada caso. Cada vez mais, o tratamento do trauma renal está a evoluir para um tratamento mais conservador, evitando a cirurgia sempre que possível. O nosso objetivo foi analisar os doentes com trauma renal durante 5 anos no nosso centro e reportar quais os padrões de lesão, o seu tratamento e complicações. Método: Análise retrospetiva dos doentes diagnosticados com trauma renal no Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, entre Janeiro de 2017 e Setembro de 2021. Os dados foram obtidos através do processo clínico dos doentes. Resultados: Durante este período de tempo, foram identificados 29 doentes, 93,1% do sexo masculino, admitidos por trauma renal. A idade média foi de 48 anos e a grande maioria apresentava um trauma contuso (89,7%). A distribuição dos graus de trauma de acordo com a AAST foi: 6,9% grau I, 13,8% grau II, 41,4% grau III, 31% grau IV e 6,9% grau V. Não se registaram óbitos devido a trauma renal. Foram tratados conservadoramente 43,3%, com embolização pela radiologia de intervenção 6,7%, com a colocação de um stent duplo J 30,0% e com nefrectomia 20,0%. Apresentaram complicações precoces, 34,4%. Conclusão: Tal como expectável, a maioria dos doentes foram admitidos devido a trauma contuso. Atualmente, o tratamento é tendencialmente mais conservador, apesar de na nossa amostra metade dos doentes terem necessitado de uma intervenção, maioritariamente devido a extravasão urinária mas também por hemorragia ativa ou uma evolução clínica desfavorável. As nefrectomias ocorreram quase exclusivamente em lesões de grau IV ou V. As complicações precoces, principalmente infeciosas, foram mais frequentes que o expectável, apesar de todos os doentes terem realizado antibioterapia empírica.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2024-01-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.205https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.205Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 38 No. 1-2 (2023): January - December 2021-2023; 33-38Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 38 n. 1-2 (2023): Janeiro - Dezembro 2021-2023; 33-382387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/205http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/205/72Copyright (c) 2023 Associação Portuguesa de Urologiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, VanessaMedeiros, MarianaGuerra, JoãoGil, MiguelVeloso, NgueteCunha, JoãoSilva, PedroBrito Lança, MiguelCalais, FernandoCampos Pinheiro, Luís2024-03-10T07:17:27Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/205Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:12:26.079542Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center Traumatismo Renal: Análise Retrospetiva de 5 Anos de um Centro de Trauma de Nível 1 |
title |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center |
spellingShingle |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center Andrade, Vanessa Rim/lesões Kidney/injuries |
title_short |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center |
title_full |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center |
title_fullStr |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center |
title_full_unstemmed |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center |
title_sort |
Renal Trauma: A 5-Year Retrospective Review from a Level 1 Trauma Center |
author |
Andrade, Vanessa |
author_facet |
Andrade, Vanessa Medeiros, Mariana Guerra, João Gil, Miguel Veloso, Nguete Cunha, João Silva, Pedro Brito Lança, Miguel Calais, Fernando Campos Pinheiro, Luís |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Medeiros, Mariana Guerra, João Gil, Miguel Veloso, Nguete Cunha, João Silva, Pedro Brito Lança, Miguel Calais, Fernando Campos Pinheiro, Luís |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Vanessa Medeiros, Mariana Guerra, João Gil, Miguel Veloso, Nguete Cunha, João Silva, Pedro Brito Lança, Miguel Calais, Fernando Campos Pinheiro, Luís |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Rim/lesões Kidney/injuries |
topic |
Rim/lesões Kidney/injuries |
description |
Introduction: Renal trauma accounts for about 1% to 5% of all trauma patients, the majority of which are due to blunt trauma. Based on the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification we can classify renal trauma into five grades of injury, which can help choosing the adequate treatment and anticipate the outcome. Management of renal trauma is evolving to a more conservative approach, avoiding surgery when it is possible.Our objective was to analyse our 5-year experience of renal trauma at a level 1 trauma center and report the patterns of injury, management and complications. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with renal trauma at a level 1 trauma center between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were collected from electronic patient records. Results: During this period of time, we identified 29 patients, 93.1% male, admitted due to renal trauma. Median age was 48 years old. The majority had a blunt trauma (89.7%). The distribution of injury grade according to the AAST classification was: 6.9% grade I, 13.8% grade II, 41.4% grade III, 31% grade IV and 6.9% grade V. No patient died due to this trauma. A percentage of 43.3% of patients were treated conservatively, 6.7% with embolization by interventional radiology, 30.0% with a double J ureteral stent and 20.0% with nephrectomy. Early complications were observed in 34.4% of the patients. Conclusion: The vast majority of renal injuries were due to blunt trauma, as expected. At this moment, management of renal trauma is trending to a more conservative approach, but in our sample, half of the patients needed intervention, mainly due to urinary extravasation but also because active bleeding and unfavourable clinical evolution. Nephrectomies were performed almost exclusively in grade 4 or 5 of injury. Early complications were more frequent than expected, mainly due to infection, in spite of empiric antibiotic therapy have been done in all patients. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-16 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.205 https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.205 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.205 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/205 http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/205/72 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Associação Portuguesa de Urologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Associação Portuguesa de Urologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 38 No. 1-2 (2023): January - December 2021-2023; 33-38 Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 38 n. 1-2 (2023): Janeiro - Dezembro 2021-2023; 33-38 2387-0419 2341-4022 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137773319356416 |