Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To evaluate the impact of eye and head rotation in the measurement of peripheral refraction with an open-field autorefractometer in myopic eyes wearing two different center-distance designs of multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs). Methods: Nineteen right eyes from 19 myopic patients (average central M ± SD = −2.67 ± 1.66 D) aged 20–27 years (mean ± SD = 23.2 ± 3.3 years) were evaluated using a Grand-Seiko autorefractometer. Patients were fitted with one multifocal aspheric center-distance contact lens (Biofinity Multifocal D®) and with one multi-concentric MFCL (Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia). Axial and peripheral refraction were evaluated by eye rotation and by head rotation under naked eye condition and with each MFCL fitted randomly and in independent sessions. Results: For the naked eye, refractive pattern (M, J0 and J45) across the central 60◦ of the horizontal visual field values did not show significant changes measured by rotating the eye or rotating the head (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained wearing the Biofinity D, for both testing methods, no obtaining significant differences to M, J0 and J45 values (p > 0.05). For Acuvue Oasys for presbyopia, also no differences were found when comparing measurements obtained by eye and head rotation (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis did not showed a significant interaction between testing method and lens type neither with measuring locations (MANOVA, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in M and J0 values between naked eyes and each MFCL. Conclusion: Measurements of peripheral refraction by rotating the eye or rotating the head in myopic patients wearing dominant design or multi-concentric multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lens are comparable. |
id |
RCAP_5b109a7edf9584c3c273af004fda828e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/39504 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lensesPeripheral refractionMyopiaMultifocal contact lensEye rotationHead rotationScience & TechnologyPurpose: To evaluate the impact of eye and head rotation in the measurement of peripheral refraction with an open-field autorefractometer in myopic eyes wearing two different center-distance designs of multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs). Methods: Nineteen right eyes from 19 myopic patients (average central M ± SD = −2.67 ± 1.66 D) aged 20–27 years (mean ± SD = 23.2 ± 3.3 years) were evaluated using a Grand-Seiko autorefractometer. Patients were fitted with one multifocal aspheric center-distance contact lens (Biofinity Multifocal D®) and with one multi-concentric MFCL (Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia). Axial and peripheral refraction were evaluated by eye rotation and by head rotation under naked eye condition and with each MFCL fitted randomly and in independent sessions. Results: For the naked eye, refractive pattern (M, J0 and J45) across the central 60◦ of the horizontal visual field values did not show significant changes measured by rotating the eye or rotating the head (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained wearing the Biofinity D, for both testing methods, no obtaining significant differences to M, J0 and J45 values (p > 0.05). For Acuvue Oasys for presbyopia, also no differences were found when comparing measurements obtained by eye and head rotation (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis did not showed a significant interaction between testing method and lens type neither with measuring locations (MANOVA, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in M and J0 values between naked eyes and each MFCL. Conclusion: Measurements of peripheral refraction by rotating the eye or rotating the head in myopic patients wearing dominant design or multi-concentric multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lens are comparable.The authors thank the companies that donated the contact lenses used in the study. The authors declare that they do not have any proprietary or financial interests in any of the materials mentioned in this article. This work was funded in part by FEDER through the COMPETE Program and by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) in the framework of projects PTDC/SAU-BEB/098391/2008, PTDC/SAU-BEB/098392/2008 and the Strategic Project PEST-C/FIS/UI607/2011. This study has been presented at American Academy of Optometry, Seattle 2013, October 24th to 27th.ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoFerreira, Daniela Patrícia LopesNeves, Helena Isabel FerreiraRibeiro, Miguel António FariaQueirós, A.Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues BotelhoGonzález-Méijome, José Manuel20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504engLopes-Ferreira, Daniela P.; Neves, Helena I.F.; Faria-Ribeiro, Miguel; Queirós, António; Fernandes, Paulo R.B.; González-Méijome, José M.Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 38, 2, 104-109, 2015.1367-048410.1016/j.clae.2014.11.20125529474info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:32:17Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/39504Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:27:36.959987Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses |
title |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses |
spellingShingle |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes Peripheral refraction Myopia Multifocal contact lens Eye rotation Head rotation Science & Technology |
title_short |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses |
title_full |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses |
title_fullStr |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses |
title_sort |
Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses |
author |
Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes Neves, Helena Isabel Ferreira Ribeiro, Miguel António Faria Queirós, A. Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues Botelho González-Méijome, José Manuel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neves, Helena Isabel Ferreira Ribeiro, Miguel António Faria Queirós, A. Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues Botelho González-Méijome, José Manuel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes Neves, Helena Isabel Ferreira Ribeiro, Miguel António Faria Queirós, A. Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues Botelho González-Méijome, José Manuel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Peripheral refraction Myopia Multifocal contact lens Eye rotation Head rotation Science & Technology |
topic |
Peripheral refraction Myopia Multifocal contact lens Eye rotation Head rotation Science & Technology |
description |
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of eye and head rotation in the measurement of peripheral refraction with an open-field autorefractometer in myopic eyes wearing two different center-distance designs of multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs). Methods: Nineteen right eyes from 19 myopic patients (average central M ± SD = −2.67 ± 1.66 D) aged 20–27 years (mean ± SD = 23.2 ± 3.3 years) were evaluated using a Grand-Seiko autorefractometer. Patients were fitted with one multifocal aspheric center-distance contact lens (Biofinity Multifocal D®) and with one multi-concentric MFCL (Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia). Axial and peripheral refraction were evaluated by eye rotation and by head rotation under naked eye condition and with each MFCL fitted randomly and in independent sessions. Results: For the naked eye, refractive pattern (M, J0 and J45) across the central 60◦ of the horizontal visual field values did not show significant changes measured by rotating the eye or rotating the head (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained wearing the Biofinity D, for both testing methods, no obtaining significant differences to M, J0 and J45 values (p > 0.05). For Acuvue Oasys for presbyopia, also no differences were found when comparing measurements obtained by eye and head rotation (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis did not showed a significant interaction between testing method and lens type neither with measuring locations (MANOVA, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in M and J0 values between naked eyes and each MFCL. Conclusion: Measurements of peripheral refraction by rotating the eye or rotating the head in myopic patients wearing dominant design or multi-concentric multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lens are comparable. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Lopes-Ferreira, Daniela P.; Neves, Helena I.F.; Faria-Ribeiro, Miguel; Queirós, António; Fernandes, Paulo R.B.; González-Méijome, José M.Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 38, 2, 104-109, 2015. 1367-0484 10.1016/j.clae.2014.11.201 25529474 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132768356007936 |