Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Neves, Helena Isabel Ferreira, Ribeiro, Miguel António Faria, Queirós, A., Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues Botelho, González-Méijome, José Manuel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504
Resumo: Purpose: To evaluate the impact of eye and head rotation in the measurement of peripheral refraction with an open-field autorefractometer in myopic eyes wearing two different center-distance designs of multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs). Methods: Nineteen right eyes from 19 myopic patients (average central M ± SD = −2.67 ± 1.66 D) aged 20–27 years (mean ± SD = 23.2 ± 3.3 years) were evaluated using a Grand-Seiko autorefractometer. Patients were fitted with one multifocal aspheric center-distance contact lens (Biofinity Multifocal D®) and with one multi-concentric MFCL (Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia). Axial and peripheral refraction were evaluated by eye rotation and by head rotation under naked eye condition and with each MFCL fitted randomly and in independent sessions. Results: For the naked eye, refractive pattern (M, J0 and J45) across the central 60◦ of the horizontal visual field values did not show significant changes measured by rotating the eye or rotating the head (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained wearing the Biofinity D, for both testing methods, no obtaining significant differences to M, J0 and J45 values (p > 0.05). For Acuvue Oasys for presbyopia, also no differences were found when comparing measurements obtained by eye and head rotation (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis did not showed a significant interaction between testing method and lens type neither with measuring locations (MANOVA, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in M and J0 values between naked eyes and each MFCL. Conclusion: Measurements of peripheral refraction by rotating the eye or rotating the head in myopic patients wearing dominant design or multi-concentric multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lens are comparable.
id RCAP_5b109a7edf9584c3c273af004fda828e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/39504
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lensesPeripheral refractionMyopiaMultifocal contact lensEye rotationHead rotationScience & TechnologyPurpose: To evaluate the impact of eye and head rotation in the measurement of peripheral refraction with an open-field autorefractometer in myopic eyes wearing two different center-distance designs of multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs). Methods: Nineteen right eyes from 19 myopic patients (average central M ± SD = −2.67 ± 1.66 D) aged 20–27 years (mean ± SD = 23.2 ± 3.3 years) were evaluated using a Grand-Seiko autorefractometer. Patients were fitted with one multifocal aspheric center-distance contact lens (Biofinity Multifocal D®) and with one multi-concentric MFCL (Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia). Axial and peripheral refraction were evaluated by eye rotation and by head rotation under naked eye condition and with each MFCL fitted randomly and in independent sessions. Results: For the naked eye, refractive pattern (M, J0 and J45) across the central 60◦ of the horizontal visual field values did not show significant changes measured by rotating the eye or rotating the head (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained wearing the Biofinity D, for both testing methods, no obtaining significant differences to M, J0 and J45 values (p > 0.05). For Acuvue Oasys for presbyopia, also no differences were found when comparing measurements obtained by eye and head rotation (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis did not showed a significant interaction between testing method and lens type neither with measuring locations (MANOVA, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in M and J0 values between naked eyes and each MFCL. Conclusion: Measurements of peripheral refraction by rotating the eye or rotating the head in myopic patients wearing dominant design or multi-concentric multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lens are comparable.The authors thank the companies that donated the contact lenses used in the study. The authors declare that they do not have any proprietary or financial interests in any of the materials mentioned in this article. This work was funded in part by FEDER through the COMPETE Program and by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) in the framework of projects PTDC/SAU-BEB/098391/2008, PTDC/SAU-BEB/098392/2008 and the Strategic Project PEST-C/FIS/UI607/2011. This study has been presented at American Academy of Optometry, Seattle 2013, October 24th to 27th.ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoFerreira, Daniela Patrícia LopesNeves, Helena Isabel FerreiraRibeiro, Miguel António FariaQueirós, A.Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues BotelhoGonzález-Méijome, José Manuel20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504engLopes-Ferreira, Daniela P.; Neves, Helena I.F.; Faria-Ribeiro, Miguel; Queirós, António; Fernandes, Paulo R.B.; González-Méijome, José M.Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 38, 2, 104-109, 2015.1367-048410.1016/j.clae.2014.11.20125529474info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:32:17Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/39504Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:27:36.959987Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
title Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
spellingShingle Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes
Peripheral refraction
Myopia
Multifocal contact lens
Eye rotation
Head rotation
Science & Technology
title_short Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
title_full Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
title_fullStr Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
title_sort Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses
author Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes
author_facet Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes
Neves, Helena Isabel Ferreira
Ribeiro, Miguel António Faria
Queirós, A.
Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues Botelho
González-Méijome, José Manuel
author_role author
author2 Neves, Helena Isabel Ferreira
Ribeiro, Miguel António Faria
Queirós, A.
Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues Botelho
González-Méijome, José Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Daniela Patrícia Lopes
Neves, Helena Isabel Ferreira
Ribeiro, Miguel António Faria
Queirós, A.
Fernandes, Paulo Rodrigues Botelho
González-Méijome, José Manuel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peripheral refraction
Myopia
Multifocal contact lens
Eye rotation
Head rotation
Science & Technology
topic Peripheral refraction
Myopia
Multifocal contact lens
Eye rotation
Head rotation
Science & Technology
description Purpose: To evaluate the impact of eye and head rotation in the measurement of peripheral refraction with an open-field autorefractometer in myopic eyes wearing two different center-distance designs of multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs). Methods: Nineteen right eyes from 19 myopic patients (average central M ± SD = −2.67 ± 1.66 D) aged 20–27 years (mean ± SD = 23.2 ± 3.3 years) were evaluated using a Grand-Seiko autorefractometer. Patients were fitted with one multifocal aspheric center-distance contact lens (Biofinity Multifocal D®) and with one multi-concentric MFCL (Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia). Axial and peripheral refraction were evaluated by eye rotation and by head rotation under naked eye condition and with each MFCL fitted randomly and in independent sessions. Results: For the naked eye, refractive pattern (M, J0 and J45) across the central 60◦ of the horizontal visual field values did not show significant changes measured by rotating the eye or rotating the head (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained wearing the Biofinity D, for both testing methods, no obtaining significant differences to M, J0 and J45 values (p > 0.05). For Acuvue Oasys for presbyopia, also no differences were found when comparing measurements obtained by eye and head rotation (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis did not showed a significant interaction between testing method and lens type neither with measuring locations (MANOVA, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in M and J0 values between naked eyes and each MFCL. Conclusion: Measurements of peripheral refraction by rotating the eye or rotating the head in myopic patients wearing dominant design or multi-concentric multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lens are comparable.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/39504
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Lopes-Ferreira, Daniela P.; Neves, Helena I.F.; Faria-Ribeiro, Miguel; Queirós, António; Fernandes, Paulo R.B.; González-Méijome, José M.Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 38, 2, 104-109, 2015.
1367-0484
10.1016/j.clae.2014.11.201
25529474
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132768356007936