Application of climate-smart forestry – forest manager response to the relevance of European definition and indicators

• Autor(a) principal: Bowditch, Euan
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Santopuoli, Giovanni, Neroj, Boyżdar, Svetlik, Jan, Tominlson, Mark, Pohl, Vivien, Avdagić, Admir, Rio, Miren de, Zlatanov, Tzetvan, Maria, Höhn, Jamnická, Gabriela, Serengil, Yusuf, Sarginci, Murat, Brynleifsdóttir, Sigríður Júlía, Lesinki, Jerzy, Azevedo, João
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/26793
• topic: Forest management; Climate change; Forestry Indicators; Communication

Climate change impacts are an increasing threat to forests and current approaches to management. In 2020, Climate-smart Forestry (CSF) definition and set of indicators was published. This study further developed this work by testing the definition and indicators through a forest manager survey across fifteen member European countries. The survey covered topic areas of demographics, climate change impacts, definition and indicators assessment, as well as knowledge and communication. Overall, forest managers considered the threat of climate change to their forests as high or critical and 62% found the CSF definition clear and concise; however, the minority suggested greater simplification or nuance. Indicators were viewed as comprehensive but too numerous to integrate into management activities. Two highest ranking indicators were ‘Trees species composition’, and ‘Erosion protection and maintenance of soil condition’. Many managers were aware of suitable alternative species, but also stressed that greater resources should focus on exploring adaptable provenances. Demonstration sites and interactive guides were ranked highest for communication and dissemination; however, online multimedia tools and workshops were also ranked highly. Local perspectives on providing more relevant CSF ranged from silviculture systems, finance and funding, education and training, and social awareness, to tree species mixes and development of protective functions. In summary, forest managers were generally open to CSF, but required greater guidance and proof of application.