Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gisladottir, Johanna
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Sigurgeirsdottir, Sigurbjörg, Stjernquist, Ingrid, Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2713
Resumo: In this research, we attempt to shed light on the question of where corruption risks in the governance of renewable resources are located and how they have been addressed in European countries that have different levels of corruption. A comparative case study design was chosen, looking into the fisheries sector in Iceland and the forestry sector in Romania. We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders sampled through a snowball method. Qualitative coding and systems analysis were used to analyse the interviews. The results indicate that comprehensive and ambitious legislation does not necessarily translate into successful resource governance systems. In general, the institutions that were put in place to enforce and monitor the legal codes and regulations did not have the capacity to carry out their role. Additionally, interviewees were generally found to have a widespread perception of there being a corrupt relationship between politics and big companies operating in their sectors. Our findings suggest that when people hold such perceptions, it undermines anti-corruption policy efforts in the resource sectors, which can then impede sustainable resource management.
id RCAP_5ca716d6f690d32bd51b20c57acb47b7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2713
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romaniaanti-corruption; corruption; enforcement mechanisms; governance; monitoring; natural resources; renewable resourcesIn this research, we attempt to shed light on the question of where corruption risks in the governance of renewable resources are located and how they have been addressed in European countries that have different levels of corruption. A comparative case study design was chosen, looking into the fisheries sector in Iceland and the forestry sector in Romania. We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders sampled through a snowball method. Qualitative coding and systems analysis were used to analyse the interviews. The results indicate that comprehensive and ambitious legislation does not necessarily translate into successful resource governance systems. In general, the institutions that were put in place to enforce and monitor the legal codes and regulations did not have the capacity to carry out their role. Additionally, interviewees were generally found to have a widespread perception of there being a corrupt relationship between politics and big companies operating in their sectors. Our findings suggest that when people hold such perceptions, it undermines anti-corruption policy efforts in the resource sectors, which can then impede sustainable resource management.Cogitatio2020-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2713oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2713Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Fighting Corruption in the Developed World: Dimensions, Patterns, Remedies; 167-1792183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2713https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2713https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2713/2713info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCopyright (c) 2020 Johanna Gisladottir, Sigurbjörg Sigurgeirsdottir, Ingrid Stjernquist, Kristin Vala Ragnarsdottirhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0Gisladottir, JohannaSigurgeirsdottir, SigurbjörgStjernquist, IngridRagnarsdottir, Kristin Vala2022-10-21T16:03:02Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2713Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:44.227935Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
title Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
spellingShingle Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
Gisladottir, Johanna
anti-corruption; corruption; enforcement mechanisms; governance; monitoring; natural resources; renewable resources
title_short Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
title_full Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
title_fullStr Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
title_full_unstemmed Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
title_sort Corruption Risks in Renewable Resource Governance: Case Studies in Iceland and Romania
author Gisladottir, Johanna
author_facet Gisladottir, Johanna
Sigurgeirsdottir, Sigurbjörg
Stjernquist, Ingrid
Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala
author_role author
author2 Sigurgeirsdottir, Sigurbjörg
Stjernquist, Ingrid
Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gisladottir, Johanna
Sigurgeirsdottir, Sigurbjörg
Stjernquist, Ingrid
Ragnarsdottir, Kristin Vala
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv anti-corruption; corruption; enforcement mechanisms; governance; monitoring; natural resources; renewable resources
topic anti-corruption; corruption; enforcement mechanisms; governance; monitoring; natural resources; renewable resources
description In this research, we attempt to shed light on the question of where corruption risks in the governance of renewable resources are located and how they have been addressed in European countries that have different levels of corruption. A comparative case study design was chosen, looking into the fisheries sector in Iceland and the forestry sector in Romania. We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders sampled through a snowball method. Qualitative coding and systems analysis were used to analyse the interviews. The results indicate that comprehensive and ambitious legislation does not necessarily translate into successful resource governance systems. In general, the institutions that were put in place to enforce and monitor the legal codes and regulations did not have the capacity to carry out their role. Additionally, interviewees were generally found to have a widespread perception of there being a corrupt relationship between politics and big companies operating in their sectors. Our findings suggest that when people hold such perceptions, it undermines anti-corruption policy efforts in the resource sectors, which can then impede sustainable resource management.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2713
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2713
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2713
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2713
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2713
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2713
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2713/2713
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Fighting Corruption in the Developed World: Dimensions, Patterns, Remedies; 167-179
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130591129501696