Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the prognosis of patients following curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by hepatitis B (HBV-ICC), hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC), and no identifiable cause (conventional ICC) etiologic subtype. METHODS: 986 patients with HBV-ICC (n = 201), stone-ICC (n = 103), and conventional ICC (n = 682) who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate residual bias. RESULTS: HBV-ICC patients more often had cirrhosis, earlier stage tumors, a mass-forming lesion, well-to-moderate tumor differentiation, and an R0 resection versus stone-ICC or conventional ICC patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival among HBV-ICC and conventional ICC patients was 23.9 and 17.8%, respectively, versus a recurrence-free of only 8.3% among patients with stone-ICC. Similarly, 5-year overall survival among patients with stone-ICC was only 18.3% compared with 48.9 and 38.0% for patients with HBV-ICC and conventional ICC, respectively. On PSM, patients with stone-ICC group had equivalent long-term outcomes as HBV-ICC patients. In contrast, on PSM, stone-ICC patients had a median overall survival of only 18.0 months versus 44.0 months for patients with conventional ICC. Median overall survival after intrahepatic-only recurrence among patients who had stone-ICC (6.0 months) was worse than OS among HBV-ICC (13.0 months) or conventional ICC (12.0 months) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.082, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While HBV-ICC had a better prognosis on unadjusted analyses, these differences were mitigated on PSM suggesting no stage-for-stage differences in outcomes compared with stone-ICC or conventional ICC. In contrast, patients with stone-ICC had worse long-term outcomes. These data highlight the relative importance of ICC etiology relative to established clinicopathological factors in the prognosis of patients with ICC. |
id |
RCAP_5d94a0f6c1d99cf132f5b43d312f31d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2928 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional StudyHCC CIRBile Duct Neoplasms/etiologyBile Duct Neoplasms/mortalityBile Duct Neoplasms/surgeryBile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgeryCholangiocarcinoma/etiologyCholangiocarcinoma/mortalityCholangiocarcinoma/surgeryDatabases, FactualFollow-Up StudiesNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiologyNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortalityPrognosisPropensity ScoreRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisBACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the prognosis of patients following curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by hepatitis B (HBV-ICC), hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC), and no identifiable cause (conventional ICC) etiologic subtype. METHODS: 986 patients with HBV-ICC (n = 201), stone-ICC (n = 103), and conventional ICC (n = 682) who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate residual bias. RESULTS: HBV-ICC patients more often had cirrhosis, earlier stage tumors, a mass-forming lesion, well-to-moderate tumor differentiation, and an R0 resection versus stone-ICC or conventional ICC patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival among HBV-ICC and conventional ICC patients was 23.9 and 17.8%, respectively, versus a recurrence-free of only 8.3% among patients with stone-ICC. Similarly, 5-year overall survival among patients with stone-ICC was only 18.3% compared with 48.9 and 38.0% for patients with HBV-ICC and conventional ICC, respectively. On PSM, patients with stone-ICC group had equivalent long-term outcomes as HBV-ICC patients. In contrast, on PSM, stone-ICC patients had a median overall survival of only 18.0 months versus 44.0 months for patients with conventional ICC. Median overall survival after intrahepatic-only recurrence among patients who had stone-ICC (6.0 months) was worse than OS among HBV-ICC (13.0 months) or conventional ICC (12.0 months) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.082, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While HBV-ICC had a better prognosis on unadjusted analyses, these differences were mitigated on PSM suggesting no stage-for-stage differences in outcomes compared with stone-ICC or conventional ICC. In contrast, patients with stone-ICC had worse long-term outcomes. These data highlight the relative importance of ICC etiology relative to established clinicopathological factors in the prognosis of patients with ICC.Springer VerlagRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEZhang, XFChakedis, JBagante, FBeal, EWLv, YWeiss, MPopescu, IPinto Marques, HAldrighetti, LMaithel, SKPulitano, CBauer, TWShen, FPoultsides, GASoubrane, OMartel, GGroot Koerkamp, BGuglielmi, AItaru, EPawlik, TM2018-03-02T15:57:28Z2018-032018-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928engWorld J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):849-85710.1007/s00268-017-4199-9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:40:22Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2928Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:15.266429Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study |
title |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study |
spellingShingle |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study Zhang, XF HCC CIR Bile Duct Neoplasms/etiology Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery Databases, Factual Follow-Up Studies Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality Prognosis Propensity Score Risk Factors Survival Analysis |
title_short |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study |
title_full |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study |
title_fullStr |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study |
title_sort |
Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study |
author |
Zhang, XF |
author_facet |
Zhang, XF Chakedis, J Bagante, F Beal, EW Lv, Y Weiss, M Popescu, I Pinto Marques, H Aldrighetti, L Maithel, SK Pulitano, C Bauer, TW Shen, F Poultsides, GA Soubrane, O Martel, G Groot Koerkamp, B Guglielmi, A Itaru, E Pawlik, TM |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chakedis, J Bagante, F Beal, EW Lv, Y Weiss, M Popescu, I Pinto Marques, H Aldrighetti, L Maithel, SK Pulitano, C Bauer, TW Shen, F Poultsides, GA Soubrane, O Martel, G Groot Koerkamp, B Guglielmi, A Itaru, E Pawlik, TM |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zhang, XF Chakedis, J Bagante, F Beal, EW Lv, Y Weiss, M Popescu, I Pinto Marques, H Aldrighetti, L Maithel, SK Pulitano, C Bauer, TW Shen, F Poultsides, GA Soubrane, O Martel, G Groot Koerkamp, B Guglielmi, A Itaru, E Pawlik, TM |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
HCC CIR Bile Duct Neoplasms/etiology Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery Databases, Factual Follow-Up Studies Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality Prognosis Propensity Score Risk Factors Survival Analysis |
topic |
HCC CIR Bile Duct Neoplasms/etiology Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery Databases, Factual Follow-Up Studies Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality Prognosis Propensity Score Risk Factors Survival Analysis |
description |
BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the prognosis of patients following curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by hepatitis B (HBV-ICC), hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC), and no identifiable cause (conventional ICC) etiologic subtype. METHODS: 986 patients with HBV-ICC (n = 201), stone-ICC (n = 103), and conventional ICC (n = 682) who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate residual bias. RESULTS: HBV-ICC patients more often had cirrhosis, earlier stage tumors, a mass-forming lesion, well-to-moderate tumor differentiation, and an R0 resection versus stone-ICC or conventional ICC patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival among HBV-ICC and conventional ICC patients was 23.9 and 17.8%, respectively, versus a recurrence-free of only 8.3% among patients with stone-ICC. Similarly, 5-year overall survival among patients with stone-ICC was only 18.3% compared with 48.9 and 38.0% for patients with HBV-ICC and conventional ICC, respectively. On PSM, patients with stone-ICC group had equivalent long-term outcomes as HBV-ICC patients. In contrast, on PSM, stone-ICC patients had a median overall survival of only 18.0 months versus 44.0 months for patients with conventional ICC. Median overall survival after intrahepatic-only recurrence among patients who had stone-ICC (6.0 months) was worse than OS among HBV-ICC (13.0 months) or conventional ICC (12.0 months) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.082, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While HBV-ICC had a better prognosis on unadjusted analyses, these differences were mitigated on PSM suggesting no stage-for-stage differences in outcomes compared with stone-ICC or conventional ICC. In contrast, patients with stone-ICC had worse long-term outcomes. These data highlight the relative importance of ICC etiology relative to established clinicopathological factors in the prognosis of patients with ICC. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-02T15:57:28Z 2018-03 2018-03-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):849-857 10.1007/s00268-017-4199-9 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Verlag |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131298765209600 |