Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zhang, XF
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Chakedis, J, Bagante, F, Beal, EW, Lv, Y, Weiss, M, Popescu, I, Pinto Marques, H, Aldrighetti, L, Maithel, SK, Pulitano, C, Bauer, TW, Shen, F, Poultsides, GA, Soubrane, O, Martel, G, Groot Koerkamp, B, Guglielmi, A, Itaru, E, Pawlik, TM
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928
Resumo: BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the prognosis of patients following curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by hepatitis B (HBV-ICC), hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC), and no identifiable cause (conventional ICC) etiologic subtype. METHODS: 986 patients with HBV-ICC (n = 201), stone-ICC (n = 103), and conventional ICC (n = 682) who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate residual bias. RESULTS: HBV-ICC patients more often had cirrhosis, earlier stage tumors, a mass-forming lesion, well-to-moderate tumor differentiation, and an R0 resection versus stone-ICC or conventional ICC patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival among HBV-ICC and conventional ICC patients was 23.9 and 17.8%, respectively, versus a recurrence-free of only 8.3% among patients with stone-ICC. Similarly, 5-year overall survival among patients with stone-ICC was only 18.3% compared with 48.9 and 38.0% for patients with HBV-ICC and conventional ICC, respectively. On PSM, patients with stone-ICC group had equivalent long-term outcomes as HBV-ICC patients. In contrast, on PSM, stone-ICC patients had a median overall survival of only 18.0 months versus 44.0 months for patients with conventional ICC. Median overall survival after intrahepatic-only recurrence among patients who had stone-ICC (6.0 months) was worse than OS among HBV-ICC (13.0 months) or conventional ICC (12.0 months) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.082, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While HBV-ICC had a better prognosis on unadjusted analyses, these differences were mitigated on PSM suggesting no stage-for-stage differences in outcomes compared with stone-ICC or conventional ICC. In contrast, patients with stone-ICC had worse long-term outcomes. These data highlight the relative importance of ICC etiology relative to established clinicopathological factors in the prognosis of patients with ICC.
id RCAP_5d94a0f6c1d99cf132f5b43d312f31d5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2928
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional StudyHCC CIRBile Duct Neoplasms/etiologyBile Duct Neoplasms/mortalityBile Duct Neoplasms/surgeryBile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgeryCholangiocarcinoma/etiologyCholangiocarcinoma/mortalityCholangiocarcinoma/surgeryDatabases, FactualFollow-Up StudiesNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiologyNeoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortalityPrognosisPropensity ScoreRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisBACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the prognosis of patients following curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by hepatitis B (HBV-ICC), hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC), and no identifiable cause (conventional ICC) etiologic subtype. METHODS: 986 patients with HBV-ICC (n = 201), stone-ICC (n = 103), and conventional ICC (n = 682) who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate residual bias. RESULTS: HBV-ICC patients more often had cirrhosis, earlier stage tumors, a mass-forming lesion, well-to-moderate tumor differentiation, and an R0 resection versus stone-ICC or conventional ICC patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival among HBV-ICC and conventional ICC patients was 23.9 and 17.8%, respectively, versus a recurrence-free of only 8.3% among patients with stone-ICC. Similarly, 5-year overall survival among patients with stone-ICC was only 18.3% compared with 48.9 and 38.0% for patients with HBV-ICC and conventional ICC, respectively. On PSM, patients with stone-ICC group had equivalent long-term outcomes as HBV-ICC patients. In contrast, on PSM, stone-ICC patients had a median overall survival of only 18.0 months versus 44.0 months for patients with conventional ICC. Median overall survival after intrahepatic-only recurrence among patients who had stone-ICC (6.0 months) was worse than OS among HBV-ICC (13.0 months) or conventional ICC (12.0 months) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.082, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While HBV-ICC had a better prognosis on unadjusted analyses, these differences were mitigated on PSM suggesting no stage-for-stage differences in outcomes compared with stone-ICC or conventional ICC. In contrast, patients with stone-ICC had worse long-term outcomes. These data highlight the relative importance of ICC etiology relative to established clinicopathological factors in the prognosis of patients with ICC.Springer VerlagRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEZhang, XFChakedis, JBagante, FBeal, EWLv, YWeiss, MPopescu, IPinto Marques, HAldrighetti, LMaithel, SKPulitano, CBauer, TWShen, FPoultsides, GASoubrane, OMartel, GGroot Koerkamp, BGuglielmi, AItaru, EPawlik, TM2018-03-02T15:57:28Z2018-032018-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928engWorld J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):849-85710.1007/s00268-017-4199-9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:40:22Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/2928Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:20:15.266429Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
title Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
spellingShingle Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
Zhang, XF
HCC CIR
Bile Duct Neoplasms/etiology
Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology
Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
Databases, Factual
Follow-Up Studies
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
Prognosis
Propensity Score
Risk Factors
Survival Analysis
title_short Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
title_full Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
title_fullStr Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
title_sort Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis after Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study
author Zhang, XF
author_facet Zhang, XF
Chakedis, J
Bagante, F
Beal, EW
Lv, Y
Weiss, M
Popescu, I
Pinto Marques, H
Aldrighetti, L
Maithel, SK
Pulitano, C
Bauer, TW
Shen, F
Poultsides, GA
Soubrane, O
Martel, G
Groot Koerkamp, B
Guglielmi, A
Itaru, E
Pawlik, TM
author_role author
author2 Chakedis, J
Bagante, F
Beal, EW
Lv, Y
Weiss, M
Popescu, I
Pinto Marques, H
Aldrighetti, L
Maithel, SK
Pulitano, C
Bauer, TW
Shen, F
Poultsides, GA
Soubrane, O
Martel, G
Groot Koerkamp, B
Guglielmi, A
Itaru, E
Pawlik, TM
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zhang, XF
Chakedis, J
Bagante, F
Beal, EW
Lv, Y
Weiss, M
Popescu, I
Pinto Marques, H
Aldrighetti, L
Maithel, SK
Pulitano, C
Bauer, TW
Shen, F
Poultsides, GA
Soubrane, O
Martel, G
Groot Koerkamp, B
Guglielmi, A
Itaru, E
Pawlik, TM
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv HCC CIR
Bile Duct Neoplasms/etiology
Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology
Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
Databases, Factual
Follow-Up Studies
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
Prognosis
Propensity Score
Risk Factors
Survival Analysis
topic HCC CIR
Bile Duct Neoplasms/etiology
Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery
Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma/etiology
Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery
Databases, Factual
Follow-Up Studies
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
Prognosis
Propensity Score
Risk Factors
Survival Analysis
description BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the prognosis of patients following curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by hepatitis B (HBV-ICC), hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC), and no identifiable cause (conventional ICC) etiologic subtype. METHODS: 986 patients with HBV-ICC (n = 201), stone-ICC (n = 103), and conventional ICC (n = 682) who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate residual bias. RESULTS: HBV-ICC patients more often had cirrhosis, earlier stage tumors, a mass-forming lesion, well-to-moderate tumor differentiation, and an R0 resection versus stone-ICC or conventional ICC patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival among HBV-ICC and conventional ICC patients was 23.9 and 17.8%, respectively, versus a recurrence-free of only 8.3% among patients with stone-ICC. Similarly, 5-year overall survival among patients with stone-ICC was only 18.3% compared with 48.9 and 38.0% for patients with HBV-ICC and conventional ICC, respectively. On PSM, patients with stone-ICC group had equivalent long-term outcomes as HBV-ICC patients. In contrast, on PSM, stone-ICC patients had a median overall survival of only 18.0 months versus 44.0 months for patients with conventional ICC. Median overall survival after intrahepatic-only recurrence among patients who had stone-ICC (6.0 months) was worse than OS among HBV-ICC (13.0 months) or conventional ICC (12.0 months) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.082, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While HBV-ICC had a better prognosis on unadjusted analyses, these differences were mitigated on PSM suggesting no stage-for-stage differences in outcomes compared with stone-ICC or conventional ICC. In contrast, patients with stone-ICC had worse long-term outcomes. These data highlight the relative importance of ICC etiology relative to established clinicopathological factors in the prognosis of patients with ICC.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-02T15:57:28Z
2018-03
2018-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/2928
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):849-857
10.1007/s00268-017-4199-9
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131298765209600