Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Klingenberg, Anja
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Hearnshaw, Hilary, Wensing, Michel, Ferreira, Pedro Lopes, Raposo, Victor, Szecsenyi, Joachim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9922
Resumo: Three paper-based tools to enhance older patients’ involvement in general practice care have been used and evaluated by 63 general practitioners (GPs) and 351 patients in 10 European countries and Israel within the IMPROVE project. In all countries the tested tools were helpful for some patients, by encouraging them to ask questions, address important issues and offer their own opinions. In none of the participating countries were the tools suitable to be used universally with all older patients, and sometimes they even hindered patient involvement. In everyday practice, tools may be used from time to time, in order to remind and motivate older patients and their GPs to pay more attention to the patient’s view. GPs should tailor the choice and the use of any instrument to the individual patient, and it should be the patient’s choice whether to use a specific tool or not.
id RCAP_5dbffc0a0dbff554e4163d7e345d9ff1
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/9922
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countriesDoctor–patient communicationGeneral practiceOlder patientsPaper-based toolsPatient involvementThree paper-based tools to enhance older patients’ involvement in general practice care have been used and evaluated by 63 general practitioners (GPs) and 351 patients in 10 European countries and Israel within the IMPROVE project. In all countries the tested tools were helpful for some patients, by encouraging them to ask questions, address important issues and offer their own opinions. In none of the participating countries were the tools suitable to be used universally with all older patients, and sometimes they even hindered patient involvement. In everyday practice, tools may be used from time to time, in order to remind and motivate older patients and their GPs to pay more attention to the patient’s view. GPs should tailor the choice and the use of any instrument to the individual patient, and it should be the patient’s choice whether to use a specific tool or not.2005info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/9922http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9922engQuality in Primary Care 2005; 13: 235-42.Klingenberg, AnjaHearnshaw, HilaryWensing, MichelFerreira, Pedro LopesRaposo, VictorSzecsenyi, Joachiminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-10-15T12:31:49Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/9922Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:45:37.470360Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
title Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
spellingShingle Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
Klingenberg, Anja
Doctor–patient communication
General practice
Older patients
Paper-based tools
Patient involvement
title_short Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
title_full Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
title_fullStr Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
title_full_unstemmed Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
title_sort Older patients’ involvement in their healthcare: can paper based tools help? A feasibility study in 11 European countries
author Klingenberg, Anja
author_facet Klingenberg, Anja
Hearnshaw, Hilary
Wensing, Michel
Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
Raposo, Victor
Szecsenyi, Joachim
author_role author
author2 Hearnshaw, Hilary
Wensing, Michel
Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
Raposo, Victor
Szecsenyi, Joachim
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Klingenberg, Anja
Hearnshaw, Hilary
Wensing, Michel
Ferreira, Pedro Lopes
Raposo, Victor
Szecsenyi, Joachim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Doctor–patient communication
General practice
Older patients
Paper-based tools
Patient involvement
topic Doctor–patient communication
General practice
Older patients
Paper-based tools
Patient involvement
description Three paper-based tools to enhance older patients’ involvement in general practice care have been used and evaluated by 63 general practitioners (GPs) and 351 patients in 10 European countries and Israel within the IMPROVE project. In all countries the tested tools were helpful for some patients, by encouraging them to ask questions, address important issues and offer their own opinions. In none of the participating countries were the tools suitable to be used universally with all older patients, and sometimes they even hindered patient involvement. In everyday practice, tools may be used from time to time, in order to remind and motivate older patients and their GPs to pay more attention to the patient’s view. GPs should tailor the choice and the use of any instrument to the individual patient, and it should be the patient’s choice whether to use a specific tool or not.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9922
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9922
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/9922
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Quality in Primary Care 2005; 13: 235-42.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133730907881472