Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moro, S.
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Martins, A., Ramos, P., Esmerado, J., Costa, J. M., Almeida, D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20405
Resumo: Many university programs include Microsoft Excel courses given their value as a scientific and technical tool. However, evaluating what is effectively learned by students is a challenging task. Considering multiple-choice written exams are a standard evaluation format, this study aimed to uncover the features influencing students’ success in answering these types of questions. The empirical experiments were based on Excel evaluation exams containing questions answered by 526 students between 2012 and 2016, with a total of 3,340 answers characterized by 17 features. Through data mining, a neural network was developed that accurately modeled students’ choices. A sensitivity analysis was applied to the model to assess the most relevant features. Findings identified four highly relevant features for students’ success: number of words of the question, topic, difficulty degree, and number of similar choices. This study helps to guide the design of future exams by quantifying the individual influence of each feature.
id RCAP_5eb667faf397ca7b158d0a161d09994c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/20405
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft ExcelData miningExcelFeature relevanceMultiple-choice questionsStudents’ performanceMany university programs include Microsoft Excel courses given their value as a scientific and technical tool. However, evaluating what is effectively learned by students is a challenging task. Considering multiple-choice written exams are a standard evaluation format, this study aimed to uncover the features influencing students’ success in answering these types of questions. The empirical experiments were based on Excel evaluation exams containing questions answered by 526 students between 2012 and 2016, with a total of 3,340 answers characterized by 17 features. Through data mining, a neural network was developed that accurately modeled students’ choices. A sensitivity analysis was applied to the model to assess the most relevant features. Findings identified four highly relevant features for students’ success: number of words of the question, topic, difficulty degree, and number of similar choices. This study helps to guide the design of future exams by quantifying the individual influence of each feature.Taylor and Francis2021-10-10T00:00:00Z2020-01-01T00:00:00Z20202020-11-26T13:43:19Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/20405eng1528-70330738-056910.1080/07380569.2020.1749127Moro, S.Martins, A.Ramos, P.Esmerado, J.Costa, J. M.Almeida, D.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T18:01:52Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/20405Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:33:12.942538Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
title Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
spellingShingle Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
Moro, S.
Data mining
Excel
Feature relevance
Multiple-choice questions
Students’ performance
title_short Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
title_full Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
title_fullStr Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
title_full_unstemmed Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
title_sort Unfolding the drivers of students’ success in answering multiple-choice questions about Microsoft Excel
author Moro, S.
author_facet Moro, S.
Martins, A.
Ramos, P.
Esmerado, J.
Costa, J. M.
Almeida, D.
author_role author
author2 Martins, A.
Ramos, P.
Esmerado, J.
Costa, J. M.
Almeida, D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moro, S.
Martins, A.
Ramos, P.
Esmerado, J.
Costa, J. M.
Almeida, D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Data mining
Excel
Feature relevance
Multiple-choice questions
Students’ performance
topic Data mining
Excel
Feature relevance
Multiple-choice questions
Students’ performance
description Many university programs include Microsoft Excel courses given their value as a scientific and technical tool. However, evaluating what is effectively learned by students is a challenging task. Considering multiple-choice written exams are a standard evaluation format, this study aimed to uncover the features influencing students’ success in answering these types of questions. The empirical experiments were based on Excel evaluation exams containing questions answered by 526 students between 2012 and 2016, with a total of 3,340 answers characterized by 17 features. Through data mining, a neural network was developed that accurately modeled students’ choices. A sensitivity analysis was applied to the model to assess the most relevant features. Findings identified four highly relevant features for students’ success: number of words of the question, topic, difficulty degree, and number of similar choices. This study helps to guide the design of future exams by quantifying the individual influence of each feature.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2020
2020-11-26T13:43:19Z
2021-10-10T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20405
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20405
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1528-7033
0738-0569
10.1080/07380569.2020.1749127
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134893754548225