The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4012 |
Resumo: | Objective: Theories about how couples help each other to cope with stress, such as the systemic transactional model of dyadic coping, suggest that the cultural context in which couples live influences how their coping behavior affects their relationship satisfaction. In contrast to the theoretical assumptions, a recent meta-analysis provides evidence that neither culture, nor gender, influences the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction, at least based on their samples of couples living in North America and West Europe. Thus, it is an open questions whether the theoretical assumptions of cultural influences are false or whether cultural influences on couple behavior just occur in cultures outside of the Western world. Method: In order to examine the cultural influence, using a sample of married individuals (N = 7973) from 35 nations, we used multilevel modeling to test whether the positive association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies across nations and whether gender might moderate the association. Results: Results reveal that the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies between nations. In addition, results show that in some nations the association is higher for men and in other nations it is higher for women. Conclusions: Cultural and gender differences across the globe influence how couples’ coping behavior affects relationship outcomes. This crucial finding indicates that couple relationship education programs and interventions need to be culturally adapted, as skill trainings such as dyadic coping lead to differential effects on relationship satisfaction based on the culture in which couples live. |
id |
RCAP_5ee619d161d8f0011503555c5ba10cfc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:digituma.uma.pt:10400.13/4012 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation studyDyadic copingRelationship satisfactionCultureMultilevel modelingGender differences.Faculdade de Artes e HumanidadesObjective: Theories about how couples help each other to cope with stress, such as the systemic transactional model of dyadic coping, suggest that the cultural context in which couples live influences how their coping behavior affects their relationship satisfaction. In contrast to the theoretical assumptions, a recent meta-analysis provides evidence that neither culture, nor gender, influences the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction, at least based on their samples of couples living in North America and West Europe. Thus, it is an open questions whether the theoretical assumptions of cultural influences are false or whether cultural influences on couple behavior just occur in cultures outside of the Western world. Method: In order to examine the cultural influence, using a sample of married individuals (N = 7973) from 35 nations, we used multilevel modeling to test whether the positive association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies across nations and whether gender might moderate the association. Results: Results reveal that the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies between nations. In addition, results show that in some nations the association is higher for men and in other nations it is higher for women. Conclusions: Cultural and gender differences across the globe influence how couples’ coping behavior affects relationship outcomes. This crucial finding indicates that couple relationship education programs and interventions need to be culturally adapted, as skill trainings such as dyadic coping lead to differential effects on relationship satisfaction based on the culture in which couples live.Frontiers MediaDigitUMaHilpert, PeterRandall, Ashley K.Sorokowski, PiotrAtkins, David C.Sorokowska, AgnieszkaAhmadi, KhodabakhshAghraibeh, Ahmad M.Aryeetey, RichmondBertoni, AnnaBettache, KarimBłażejewska, MartaBodenmann, GuyBorders, JessicaBortolini, Tiago S.Butovskaya, MarinaCastro, Felipe N.Cetinkaya, HakanCunha, DianaDavid, Oana A.DeLongis, AnitaDileym, Fahd A.Domínguez Espinosa, Alejandra D. C.Donato, SilviaDronova, DariaDural, SedaFisher, MaryanneFrackowiak, TomaszGulbetekin, EvrimHamamcıoğlu Akkaya, AslıhanHansen, KarolinaHattori, Wallisen T.Hromatko, IvanaIafrate, RaffaellaJames, Bawo O.Jiang, FengKimamo, Charles O.King, David B.Koç, FıratLaar, AmosLopes, Fívia de AraújoMartinez, RocioMesko, NorbertMolodovskaya, NatalyaMoradi, KhadijehMotahari, ZahrasadatNatividade, Jean C.Ntayi, JosephOjedokun, OluyinkaOmar-Fauzee, Mohd S. B.Onyishi, Ike E.Özener, BarışPaluszak, AnnaPortugal, AldaRelvas, Ana P.Rizwan, MuhammadSalkičević, SvjetlanaSarmány-Schuller, IvanStamkou, EftychiaStoyanova, StanislavaŠukolová, DenisaSutresna, NinaTadinac, MeriTeras, AnderoTinoco Ponciano, Edna L.Tripathi, RituTripathi, NachiketaTripathi, MamtaVilchinsky, NoaXu, FengYamamoto, Maria E.Yoo, Gyesook2022-01-26T15:32:24Z20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4012engHilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., ... & Yoo, G. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1106.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-19T06:45:40Zoai:digituma.uma.pt:10400.13/4012Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:07:41.888579Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study |
title |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study |
spellingShingle |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study Hilpert, Peter Dyadic coping Relationship satisfaction Culture Multilevel modeling Gender differences . Faculdade de Artes e Humanidades |
title_short |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study |
title_full |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study |
title_fullStr |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study |
title_sort |
The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study |
author |
Hilpert, Peter |
author_facet |
Hilpert, Peter Randall, Ashley K. Sorokowski, Piotr Atkins, David C. Sorokowska, Agnieszka Ahmadi, Khodabakhsh Aghraibeh, Ahmad M. Aryeetey, Richmond Bertoni, Anna Bettache, Karim Błażejewska, Marta Bodenmann, Guy Borders, Jessica Bortolini, Tiago S. Butovskaya, Marina Castro, Felipe N. Cetinkaya, Hakan Cunha, Diana David, Oana A. DeLongis, Anita Dileym, Fahd A. Domínguez Espinosa, Alejandra D. C. Donato, Silvia Dronova, Daria Dural, Seda Fisher, Maryanne Frackowiak, Tomasz Gulbetekin, Evrim Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya, Aslıhan Hansen, Karolina Hattori, Wallisen T. Hromatko, Ivana Iafrate, Raffaella James, Bawo O. Jiang, Feng Kimamo, Charles O. King, David B. Koç, Fırat Laar, Amos Lopes, Fívia de Araújo Martinez, Rocio Mesko, Norbert Molodovskaya, Natalya Moradi, Khadijeh Motahari, Zahrasadat Natividade, Jean C. Ntayi, Joseph Ojedokun, Oluyinka Omar-Fauzee, Mohd S. B. Onyishi, Ike E. Özener, Barış Paluszak, Anna Portugal, Alda Relvas, Ana P. Rizwan, Muhammad Salkičević, Svjetlana Sarmány-Schuller, Ivan Stamkou, Eftychia Stoyanova, Stanislava Šukolová, Denisa Sutresna, Nina Tadinac, Meri Teras, Andero Tinoco Ponciano, Edna L. Tripathi, Ritu Tripathi, Nachiketa Tripathi, Mamta Vilchinsky, Noa Xu, Feng Yamamoto, Maria E. Yoo, Gyesook |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Randall, Ashley K. Sorokowski, Piotr Atkins, David C. Sorokowska, Agnieszka Ahmadi, Khodabakhsh Aghraibeh, Ahmad M. Aryeetey, Richmond Bertoni, Anna Bettache, Karim Błażejewska, Marta Bodenmann, Guy Borders, Jessica Bortolini, Tiago S. Butovskaya, Marina Castro, Felipe N. Cetinkaya, Hakan Cunha, Diana David, Oana A. DeLongis, Anita Dileym, Fahd A. Domínguez Espinosa, Alejandra D. C. Donato, Silvia Dronova, Daria Dural, Seda Fisher, Maryanne Frackowiak, Tomasz Gulbetekin, Evrim Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya, Aslıhan Hansen, Karolina Hattori, Wallisen T. Hromatko, Ivana Iafrate, Raffaella James, Bawo O. Jiang, Feng Kimamo, Charles O. King, David B. Koç, Fırat Laar, Amos Lopes, Fívia de Araújo Martinez, Rocio Mesko, Norbert Molodovskaya, Natalya Moradi, Khadijeh Motahari, Zahrasadat Natividade, Jean C. Ntayi, Joseph Ojedokun, Oluyinka Omar-Fauzee, Mohd S. B. Onyishi, Ike E. Özener, Barış Paluszak, Anna Portugal, Alda Relvas, Ana P. Rizwan, Muhammad Salkičević, Svjetlana Sarmány-Schuller, Ivan Stamkou, Eftychia Stoyanova, Stanislava Šukolová, Denisa Sutresna, Nina Tadinac, Meri Teras, Andero Tinoco Ponciano, Edna L. Tripathi, Ritu Tripathi, Nachiketa Tripathi, Mamta Vilchinsky, Noa Xu, Feng Yamamoto, Maria E. Yoo, Gyesook |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
DigitUMa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hilpert, Peter Randall, Ashley K. Sorokowski, Piotr Atkins, David C. Sorokowska, Agnieszka Ahmadi, Khodabakhsh Aghraibeh, Ahmad M. Aryeetey, Richmond Bertoni, Anna Bettache, Karim Błażejewska, Marta Bodenmann, Guy Borders, Jessica Bortolini, Tiago S. Butovskaya, Marina Castro, Felipe N. Cetinkaya, Hakan Cunha, Diana David, Oana A. DeLongis, Anita Dileym, Fahd A. Domínguez Espinosa, Alejandra D. C. Donato, Silvia Dronova, Daria Dural, Seda Fisher, Maryanne Frackowiak, Tomasz Gulbetekin, Evrim Hamamcıoğlu Akkaya, Aslıhan Hansen, Karolina Hattori, Wallisen T. Hromatko, Ivana Iafrate, Raffaella James, Bawo O. Jiang, Feng Kimamo, Charles O. King, David B. Koç, Fırat Laar, Amos Lopes, Fívia de Araújo Martinez, Rocio Mesko, Norbert Molodovskaya, Natalya Moradi, Khadijeh Motahari, Zahrasadat Natividade, Jean C. Ntayi, Joseph Ojedokun, Oluyinka Omar-Fauzee, Mohd S. B. Onyishi, Ike E. Özener, Barış Paluszak, Anna Portugal, Alda Relvas, Ana P. Rizwan, Muhammad Salkičević, Svjetlana Sarmány-Schuller, Ivan Stamkou, Eftychia Stoyanova, Stanislava Šukolová, Denisa Sutresna, Nina Tadinac, Meri Teras, Andero Tinoco Ponciano, Edna L. Tripathi, Ritu Tripathi, Nachiketa Tripathi, Mamta Vilchinsky, Noa Xu, Feng Yamamoto, Maria E. Yoo, Gyesook |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dyadic coping Relationship satisfaction Culture Multilevel modeling Gender differences . Faculdade de Artes e Humanidades |
topic |
Dyadic coping Relationship satisfaction Culture Multilevel modeling Gender differences . Faculdade de Artes e Humanidades |
description |
Objective: Theories about how couples help each other to cope with stress, such as the systemic transactional model of dyadic coping, suggest that the cultural context in which couples live influences how their coping behavior affects their relationship satisfaction. In contrast to the theoretical assumptions, a recent meta-analysis provides evidence that neither culture, nor gender, influences the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction, at least based on their samples of couples living in North America and West Europe. Thus, it is an open questions whether the theoretical assumptions of cultural influences are false or whether cultural influences on couple behavior just occur in cultures outside of the Western world. Method: In order to examine the cultural influence, using a sample of married individuals (N = 7973) from 35 nations, we used multilevel modeling to test whether the positive association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies across nations and whether gender might moderate the association. Results: Results reveal that the association between dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction varies between nations. In addition, results show that in some nations the association is higher for men and in other nations it is higher for women. Conclusions: Cultural and gender differences across the globe influence how couples’ coping behavior affects relationship outcomes. This crucial finding indicates that couple relationship education programs and interventions need to be culturally adapted, as skill trainings such as dyadic coping lead to differential effects on relationship satisfaction based on the culture in which couples live. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022-01-26T15:32:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., ... & Yoo, G. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: a 35-nation study. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1106. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817550172386754560 |