Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Maria de Fátima Henriques da
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Leal, António, Silvano, Maria da Purificação, Ferreira, Idalina, Oliveira, Fátima
Tipo de documento: Livro
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/119714
Resumo: Movie reviews is a textual genre marked by a thematic content, a characteristic style and a specific compositional structure, in which, in addition to the informative nature, there is a relevant feature: evaluation of the movie. This evaluation presupposes not only a positive or negative evaluation of this object, but also its justification, which implies the use of categories and linguistic structures appropriate for the expression of a positive or negative evaluation and its justification. To define the extent to which the analysis of textual linguistic mechanisms, especially semantic, is essential for textualization, in close correlation to the internal organization of the text, both of which are subject to the contextual conditions necessary for its reception / production, we analyzed a corpus constituted by 12 cinematographic reviews from Público in its digital edition. The analysis of the corpus has the following aims: i) to determine briefly its conditions of production and its compositional structure; ii) to analyze some of the most frequent linguistic marks for the expression of opinion on the film; iii) to verify whether the expression of positive or negative opinion on the film is made through similar or different mechanisms; and iv) to correlate the overall positive or negative value of the film with the number of stars attributed to it. The analysis of the corpus, which focused on the relevance of some linguistic elements - adjectives, verbs and nouns - in lexical cohesion, namely in determining the (positive or negative) polarity of the assessment, to establish the regularities of each group, but also their differences, on structural level in which the assessment is marked. The results of this study show that the syntactic categories considered - adjective, noun, verb - present a positive or negative evaluation, which is one of their lexical marks. However, this evaluation may overlap the evaluation compositionally attributed to the expression in which noun, verb and adjective are inserted. Thus, it was verified that the expression of positive and negative opinion is done through the same mechanisms in the two subgroups of texts that compose the corpus of analysis and that the positive or negative global polarity is, respectively, consistent with the films evaluated with 4* or 1*. It was also verified that there is an interdependence between the semantic categories that contribute to the textual configuration and the genre of text, since the linguistic marks analyzed are fundamental elements of the textualisation of the movie reviews considered, contributing to their textual cohesion. In fact, the use of these syntactic categories clearly establishes an argumentative orientation for the text, underlining the arguments offered by the speaker and that justify the evaluation of the film.
id RCAP_608b63957c32284dfdaad76e2bc68fd5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/119714
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textualCiências da linguagemlanguage sciencesMovie reviews is a textual genre marked by a thematic content, a characteristic style and a specific compositional structure, in which, in addition to the informative nature, there is a relevant feature: evaluation of the movie. This evaluation presupposes not only a positive or negative evaluation of this object, but also its justification, which implies the use of categories and linguistic structures appropriate for the expression of a positive or negative evaluation and its justification. To define the extent to which the analysis of textual linguistic mechanisms, especially semantic, is essential for textualization, in close correlation to the internal organization of the text, both of which are subject to the contextual conditions necessary for its reception / production, we analyzed a corpus constituted by 12 cinematographic reviews from Público in its digital edition. The analysis of the corpus has the following aims: i) to determine briefly its conditions of production and its compositional structure; ii) to analyze some of the most frequent linguistic marks for the expression of opinion on the film; iii) to verify whether the expression of positive or negative opinion on the film is made through similar or different mechanisms; and iv) to correlate the overall positive or negative value of the film with the number of stars attributed to it. The analysis of the corpus, which focused on the relevance of some linguistic elements - adjectives, verbs and nouns - in lexical cohesion, namely in determining the (positive or negative) polarity of the assessment, to establish the regularities of each group, but also their differences, on structural level in which the assessment is marked. The results of this study show that the syntactic categories considered - adjective, noun, verb - present a positive or negative evaluation, which is one of their lexical marks. However, this evaluation may overlap the evaluation compositionally attributed to the expression in which noun, verb and adjective are inserted. Thus, it was verified that the expression of positive and negative opinion is done through the same mechanisms in the two subgroups of texts that compose the corpus of analysis and that the positive or negative global polarity is, respectively, consistent with the films evaluated with 4* or 1*. It was also verified that there is an interdependence between the semantic categories that contribute to the textual configuration and the genre of text, since the linguistic marks analyzed are fundamental elements of the textualisation of the movie reviews considered, contributing to their textual cohesion. In fact, the use of these syntactic categories clearly establishes an argumentative orientation for the text, underlining the arguments offered by the speaker and that justify the evaluation of the film.20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/119714porSilva, Maria de Fátima Henriques daLeal, AntónioSilvano, Maria da PurificaçãoFerreira, IdalinaOliveira, Fátimainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T14:27:32Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/119714Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:01:42.358732Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
title Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
spellingShingle Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
Silva, Maria de Fátima Henriques da
Ciências da linguagem
language sciences
title_short Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
title_full Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
title_fullStr Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
title_full_unstemmed Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
title_sort Crítica cinematográfica : análise linguístico-textual
author Silva, Maria de Fátima Henriques da
author_facet Silva, Maria de Fátima Henriques da
Leal, António
Silvano, Maria da Purificação
Ferreira, Idalina
Oliveira, Fátima
author_role author
author2 Leal, António
Silvano, Maria da Purificação
Ferreira, Idalina
Oliveira, Fátima
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Maria de Fátima Henriques da
Leal, António
Silvano, Maria da Purificação
Ferreira, Idalina
Oliveira, Fátima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciências da linguagem
language sciences
topic Ciências da linguagem
language sciences
description Movie reviews is a textual genre marked by a thematic content, a characteristic style and a specific compositional structure, in which, in addition to the informative nature, there is a relevant feature: evaluation of the movie. This evaluation presupposes not only a positive or negative evaluation of this object, but also its justification, which implies the use of categories and linguistic structures appropriate for the expression of a positive or negative evaluation and its justification. To define the extent to which the analysis of textual linguistic mechanisms, especially semantic, is essential for textualization, in close correlation to the internal organization of the text, both of which are subject to the contextual conditions necessary for its reception / production, we analyzed a corpus constituted by 12 cinematographic reviews from Público in its digital edition. The analysis of the corpus has the following aims: i) to determine briefly its conditions of production and its compositional structure; ii) to analyze some of the most frequent linguistic marks for the expression of opinion on the film; iii) to verify whether the expression of positive or negative opinion on the film is made through similar or different mechanisms; and iv) to correlate the overall positive or negative value of the film with the number of stars attributed to it. The analysis of the corpus, which focused on the relevance of some linguistic elements - adjectives, verbs and nouns - in lexical cohesion, namely in determining the (positive or negative) polarity of the assessment, to establish the regularities of each group, but also their differences, on structural level in which the assessment is marked. The results of this study show that the syntactic categories considered - adjective, noun, verb - present a positive or negative evaluation, which is one of their lexical marks. However, this evaluation may overlap the evaluation compositionally attributed to the expression in which noun, verb and adjective are inserted. Thus, it was verified that the expression of positive and negative opinion is done through the same mechanisms in the two subgroups of texts that compose the corpus of analysis and that the positive or negative global polarity is, respectively, consistent with the films evaluated with 4* or 1*. It was also verified that there is an interdependence between the semantic categories that contribute to the textual configuration and the genre of text, since the linguistic marks analyzed are fundamental elements of the textualisation of the movie reviews considered, contributing to their textual cohesion. In fact, the use of these syntactic categories clearly establishes an argumentative orientation for the text, underlining the arguments offered by the speaker and that justify the evaluation of the film.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/book
format book
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/119714
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/119714
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135940995710976