The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11144/2783 |
Resumo: | On this theoretical article, I critically present the ongoing debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality. To do so, I rely on the typology put forward by Held & McGrew (2007), which divides scholars between two main approaches: the globalists and the skeptics. Among the first approach, one can then distinguish between neoliberal globalists and transformationalist globalists. Among the second one, one can distinguish between realist skeptics and Marxist skeptics. I go through the most important thinkers of each of these four perspectives, summing up the most influential arguments put forward to support their view. By grouping the views of these scholars, I show similarities and differences between the four perspectives and thus contribute to making the debate more clear. In a further section, I critically assess these arguments, identifying some of their strengths and shortcomings. |
id |
RCAP_616c81ce06cb3c4a1c917b000369138e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/2783 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overviewGlobalizationInequalityPovertyGlobalismSkepticismGlobalizaçãoDesigualdadePobrezaGlobalismoCeticismoOn this theoretical article, I critically present the ongoing debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality. To do so, I rely on the typology put forward by Held & McGrew (2007), which divides scholars between two main approaches: the globalists and the skeptics. Among the first approach, one can then distinguish between neoliberal globalists and transformationalist globalists. Among the second one, one can distinguish between realist skeptics and Marxist skeptics. I go through the most important thinkers of each of these four perspectives, summing up the most influential arguments put forward to support their view. By grouping the views of these scholars, I show similarities and differences between the four perspectives and thus contribute to making the debate more clear. In a further section, I critically assess these arguments, identifying some of their strengths and shortcomings.OBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa2016-11-03T13:26:17Z2016-11-01T00:00:00Z2016-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11144/2783eng1647-7251Valentim, Vicenteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-11T02:12:33Zoai:repositorio.ual.pt:11144/2783Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:32:24.156320Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview |
title |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview |
spellingShingle |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview Valentim, Vicente Globalization Inequality Poverty Globalism Skepticism Globalização Desigualdade Pobreza Globalismo Ceticismo |
title_short |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview |
title_full |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview |
title_fullStr |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview |
title_full_unstemmed |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview |
title_sort |
The debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality: a critical overview |
author |
Valentim, Vicente |
author_facet |
Valentim, Vicente |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valentim, Vicente |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Globalization Inequality Poverty Globalism Skepticism Globalização Desigualdade Pobreza Globalismo Ceticismo |
topic |
Globalization Inequality Poverty Globalism Skepticism Globalização Desigualdade Pobreza Globalismo Ceticismo |
description |
On this theoretical article, I critically present the ongoing debate on the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality. To do so, I rely on the typology put forward by Held & McGrew (2007), which divides scholars between two main approaches: the globalists and the skeptics. Among the first approach, one can then distinguish between neoliberal globalists and transformationalist globalists. Among the second one, one can distinguish between realist skeptics and Marxist skeptics. I go through the most important thinkers of each of these four perspectives, summing up the most influential arguments put forward to support their view. By grouping the views of these scholars, I show similarities and differences between the four perspectives and thus contribute to making the debate more clear. In a further section, I critically assess these arguments, identifying some of their strengths and shortcomings. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-11-03T13:26:17Z 2016-11-01T00:00:00Z 2016-11 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11144/2783 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11144/2783 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1647-7251 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
OBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
OBSERVARE. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136804149919744 |