Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687 |
Resumo: | Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic. |
id |
RCAP_61af822d4240dd3695b3f1dac53c43f1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Fixação com Parafusos Pediculares de Fraturas Traumáticas da Coluna Vertebral Torácica e Lombar. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.one ScrewsFracture FixationLumbar Vertebrae/injuriesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal Fractures/surgeryThoracic Vertebrae/injuries.Fixação de FracturaFracturas da Coluna VertebralParafusos ÓsseosRevisão SistemáticaVértebras Lombares/lesõesVértebras Torácicas/lesões.Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic.As fraturas da coluna vertebral torácica e lombar são causa comum de cirurgia da coluna vertebral. A fixação com parafusos pediculares é geralmente escolhida para a sua estabilização, com recurso a instrumentações curtas, longas ou monosegmentares com ou sem enxerto ósseo. O objetivo desta revisão é avaliar o efeito da fixação transpedicular nas fraturas vertebrais torácicas e lombares traumáticas. Foi realizada uma pesquisa sistemática de estudos controlados aleatorizados ou quasi-aleatorizados que comparassem diferentes técnicas de tratamento cirúrgico destas fraturas, seguida de um processo de seleção, extração de dados e avaliação de viéses por três autores independentes. Oito estudos foram incluídos, num total de cinco comparações entre diferentes fixações com parafusos pediculares. Não se encontraram diferenças significativas quanto à melhoria da função e qualidade de vida, dos défices neurológicos ou da mobilidade. Apenas a instrumentação com parafusos pediculares no nível da fratura mostrou melhoria significativa da dor quando comparada com instrumentação posterior sem parafuso no nível. Várias técnicas resultaram em melhoria significativa dos parâmetros imagiológicos, sem melhoria clínica correspondente. De modo significativo tempos cirúrgicos mais curtos associaram-se a menores perdas sanguíneas. O uso de enxerto ósseo causou um aumento significativo das complicações pós-operatórias, nomeadamente dor no local dador. Assim, os resultados mostram que melhorias imagiológicas significativas não se associam a impactos clínicos correspondentes, e que apenas o uso de fixação transpedicular no nível da fratura se associa a melhoria clínica evidente da dor. Adicionalmente, a necessidade de enxerto ósseo é posta em causa, pela ausência de melhoria clínico-imagiológica, com aumento das complicações. Contudo, o número de estudos controlados disponíveis acerca deste tópico é reduzido.Ordem dos Médicos2016-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/mswordhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2016): May; 297-300Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2016): Maio; 297-3001646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/4680https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/8382Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa - Ordem dos Médicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLinhares, Daniela Vilas Boas RosaNeves, NunoRibeiro da Silva, ManuelFonseca, João Almeida2022-12-20T11:05:17Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:29.008995Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Fixação com Parafusos Pediculares de Fraturas Traumáticas da Coluna Vertebral Torácica e Lombar. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. |
title |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa one Screws Fracture Fixation Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Spinal Fractures/surgery Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries. Fixação de Fractura Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral Parafusos Ósseos Revisão Sistemática Vértebras Lombares/lesões Vértebras Torácicas/lesões. |
title_short |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. |
title_full |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. |
title_sort |
Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073. |
author |
Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa |
author_facet |
Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa Neves, Nuno Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel Fonseca, João Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neves, Nuno Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel Fonseca, João Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa Neves, Nuno Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel Fonseca, João Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
one Screws Fracture Fixation Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Spinal Fractures/surgery Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries. Fixação de Fractura Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral Parafusos Ósseos Revisão Sistemática Vértebras Lombares/lesões Vértebras Torácicas/lesões. |
topic |
one Screws Fracture Fixation Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Spinal Fractures/surgery Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries. Fixação de Fractura Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral Parafusos Ósseos Revisão Sistemática Vértebras Lombares/lesões Vértebras Torácicas/lesões. |
description |
Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/4680 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/8382 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa - Ordem dos Médicos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa - Ordem dos Médicos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2016): May; 297-300 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2016): Maio; 297-300 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130645761359872 |