Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Neves, Nuno, Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel, Fonseca, João Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687
Resumo: Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic.
id RCAP_61af822d4240dd3695b3f1dac53c43f1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Fixação com Parafusos Pediculares de Fraturas Traumáticas da Coluna Vertebral Torácica e Lombar. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.one ScrewsFracture FixationLumbar Vertebrae/injuriesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpinal Fractures/surgeryThoracic Vertebrae/injuries.Fixação de FracturaFracturas da Coluna VertebralParafusos ÓsseosRevisão SistemáticaVértebras Lombares/lesõesVértebras Torácicas/lesões.Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic.As fraturas da coluna vertebral torácica e lombar são causa comum de cirurgia da coluna vertebral. A fixação com parafusos pediculares é geralmente escolhida para a sua estabilização, com recurso a instrumentações curtas, longas ou monosegmentares com ou sem enxerto ósseo. O objetivo desta revisão é avaliar o efeito da fixação transpedicular nas fraturas vertebrais torácicas e lombares traumáticas. Foi realizada uma pesquisa sistemática de estudos controlados aleatorizados ou quasi-aleatorizados que comparassem diferentes técnicas de tratamento cirúrgico destas fraturas, seguida de um processo de seleção, extração de dados e avaliação de viéses por três autores independentes. Oito estudos foram incluídos, num total de cinco comparações entre diferentes fixações com parafusos pediculares. Não se encontraram diferenças significativas quanto à melhoria da função e qualidade de vida, dos défices neurológicos ou da mobilidade. Apenas a instrumentação com parafusos pediculares no nível da fratura mostrou melhoria significativa da dor quando comparada com instrumentação posterior sem parafuso no nível. Várias técnicas resultaram em melhoria significativa dos parâmetros imagiológicos, sem melhoria clínica correspondente. De modo significativo tempos cirúrgicos mais curtos associaram-se a menores perdas sanguíneas. O uso de enxerto ósseo causou um aumento significativo das complicações pós-operatórias, nomeadamente dor no local dador. Assim, os resultados mostram que melhorias imagiológicas significativas não se associam a impactos clínicos correspondentes, e que apenas o uso de fixação transpedicular no nível da fratura se associa a melhoria clínica evidente da dor. Adicionalmente, a necessidade de enxerto ósseo é posta em causa, pela ausência de melhoria clínico-imagiológica, com aumento das complicações. Contudo, o número de estudos controlados disponíveis acerca deste tópico é reduzido.Ordem dos Médicos2016-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/mswordhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2016): May; 297-300Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2016): Maio; 297-3001646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/4680https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/8382Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa - Ordem dos Médicosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLinhares, Daniela Vilas Boas RosaNeves, NunoRibeiro da Silva, ManuelFonseca, João Almeida2022-12-20T11:05:17Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:29.008995Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
Análise da Revisão Cochrane: Fixação com Parafusos Pediculares de Fraturas Traumáticas da Coluna Vertebral Torácica e Lombar. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
title Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
spellingShingle Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa
one Screws
Fracture Fixation
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Spinal Fractures/surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries.
Fixação de Fractura
Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral
Parafusos Ósseos
Revisão Sistemática
Vértebras Lombares/lesões
Vértebras Torácicas/lesões.
title_short Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
title_full Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
title_fullStr Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
title_sort Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Pedicle Screw Fixation for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;05:CD009073.
author Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa
author_facet Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa
Neves, Nuno
Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel
Fonseca, João Almeida
author_role author
author2 Neves, Nuno
Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel
Fonseca, João Almeida
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Linhares, Daniela Vilas Boas Rosa
Neves, Nuno
Ribeiro da Silva, Manuel
Fonseca, João Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv one Screws
Fracture Fixation
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Spinal Fractures/surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries.
Fixação de Fractura
Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral
Parafusos Ósseos
Revisão Sistemática
Vértebras Lombares/lesões
Vértebras Torácicas/lesões.
topic one Screws
Fracture Fixation
Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Spinal Fractures/surgery
Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries.
Fixação de Fractura
Fracturas da Coluna Vertebral
Parafusos Ósseos
Revisão Sistemática
Vértebras Lombares/lesões
Vértebras Torácicas/lesões.
description Traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine are common causes of spine surgery. Pedicle screw fixation is usually chosen, using monosegmentar, short or long segment instrumentations, with or without bone graft. This review aims to evaluate the effect of transpedicular fixation in traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A systematic search on controlled, randomized or quasi-randomized trials comparing different methods of surgical treatment of this fractures was performed, followed by a process of article selection, data extraction and bias assessment by 3 independent authors. Eight articles were included in a total of 5 comparisons, between different transpedicular fixation techniques. No significant differences on function or quality of life, neurologic status or limitation of motion were found. Only instrumentation with fracture level screw incorporation showed significant decrease of pain when compared with instrumentation alone. Several techniques resulted in significant improvements of different radiological parameters. Significantly, surgeries with smaller duration were associated with lesser blood loss. Bone graft use caused a significant raise in post-operative complications, namely donor site pain. So, this paper showed that significative improvements in radiological parameters do not associate with correspondent clinical benefits, and only instrumentation with level screw incorporation is associated with a clear benefit on pain. Moreover, the need for bone graft is questioned, since it leads to no clinic-radiological improvement with a raise of complications. However, a small number of controlled studies is available on this topic.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/7687
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/4680
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7687/8382
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa - Ordem dos Médicos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2016 Acta Médica Portuguesa - Ordem dos Médicos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 No. 5 (2016): May; 297-300
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 29 N.º 5 (2016): Maio; 297-300
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130645761359872