Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Marli Andreia Oliveira Guimarães
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/16508
Resumo: This article studies the cross-country differences in work ethic and claims that different political regimes transmitted different work ethics that still persist today. Using the World Values Survey and starting our political regime analysis in 1900, we find that Democratic regimes promote more effectively work relevance and competitiveness than Autocratic and Anocratic regimes, and that the political regime history of the country is more important than the present level of democracy. Moreover, we prove that this differences were transmitted through generations by parents, who optimally choose what work ethic to transmit taking into account their own values.
id RCAP_61eac65635da0aad7ae3f5fa08a9f985
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/16508
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Work ethic and the legacies of political regimesWork ethicDemocracyAutocracyAnocracyDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoThis article studies the cross-country differences in work ethic and claims that different political regimes transmitted different work ethics that still persist today. Using the World Values Survey and starting our political regime analysis in 1900, we find that Democratic regimes promote more effectively work relevance and competitiveness than Autocratic and Anocratic regimes, and that the political regime history of the country is more important than the present level of democracy. Moreover, we prove that this differences were transmitted through generations by parents, who optimally choose what work ethic to transmit taking into account their own values.Tavares, JoséRUNFernandes, Marli Andreia Oliveira Guimarães2016-02-19T15:56:46Z2016-012016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/16508TID:201475847enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T03:53:33Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/16508Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:23:18.625295Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
title Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
spellingShingle Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
Fernandes, Marli Andreia Oliveira Guimarães
Work ethic
Democracy
Autocracy
Anocracy
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
title_full Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
title_fullStr Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
title_full_unstemmed Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
title_sort Work ethic and the legacies of political regimes
author Fernandes, Marli Andreia Oliveira Guimarães
author_facet Fernandes, Marli Andreia Oliveira Guimarães
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Tavares, José
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Marli Andreia Oliveira Guimarães
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Work ethic
Democracy
Autocracy
Anocracy
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Work ethic
Democracy
Autocracy
Anocracy
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description This article studies the cross-country differences in work ethic and claims that different political regimes transmitted different work ethics that still persist today. Using the World Values Survey and starting our political regime analysis in 1900, we find that Democratic regimes promote more effectively work relevance and competitiveness than Autocratic and Anocratic regimes, and that the political regime history of the country is more important than the present level of democracy. Moreover, we prove that this differences were transmitted through generations by parents, who optimally choose what work ethic to transmit taking into account their own values.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-19T15:56:46Z
2016-01
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/16508
TID:201475847
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/16508
identifier_str_mv TID:201475847
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137870470971392

Registros relacionados