Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Boulianne, Shelley
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Tenove, Chris, Buffie, Jordan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346
Resumo: The resilience model to disinformation (Humprecht et al., 2020, 2021) suggests that countries will differ in exposure and reactions to disinformation due to their distinct media, economic, and political environments. In this model, higher media trust and the use of public service broadcasters are expected to build resilience to disinformation, while social media use and political polarization undermine resilience. To further test and develop the resilience model, we draw on a four-country (the US, Canada, the UK, and France) survey conducted in February 2021. We focus on three individual-level indicators of a lack of resilience: awareness of, exposure to, and sharing of misinformation. We find that social media use is associated with higher levels of all three measures, which is consistent with the resilience model. Social media use decreases resilience to misinformation. Contrary to the expectations of the resilience model, trust in national news media does not build resilience. Finally, we consider the use of public broadcasting media (BBC, France Télévisions, and CBC). The use of these sources does not build resilience in the short term. Moving forward, we suggest that awareness of, exposure to, and reactions to misinformation are best understood in terms of social media use and left–right ideology. Furthermore, instead of focusing on the US as the exceptional case of low resilience, we should consider the UK as the exceptional case of high resilience to misinformation. Finally, we identify potential avenues to further develop frameworks to understand and measure resilience to misinformation.
id RCAP_62f46de2577a7a6710da44c327247ea2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5346
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About MisinformationCanada; comparative politics; France; misinformation; news media; political ideology; social media; United Kingdom; United StatesThe resilience model to disinformation (Humprecht et al., 2020, 2021) suggests that countries will differ in exposure and reactions to disinformation due to their distinct media, economic, and political environments. In this model, higher media trust and the use of public service broadcasters are expected to build resilience to disinformation, while social media use and political polarization undermine resilience. To further test and develop the resilience model, we draw on a four-country (the US, Canada, the UK, and France) survey conducted in February 2021. We focus on three individual-level indicators of a lack of resilience: awareness of, exposure to, and sharing of misinformation. We find that social media use is associated with higher levels of all three measures, which is consistent with the resilience model. Social media use decreases resilience to misinformation. Contrary to the expectations of the resilience model, trust in national news media does not build resilience. Finally, we consider the use of public broadcasting media (BBC, France Télévisions, and CBC). The use of these sources does not build resilience in the short term. Moving forward, we suggest that awareness of, exposure to, and reactions to misinformation are best understood in terms of social media use and left–right ideology. Furthermore, instead of focusing on the US as the exceptional case of low resilience, we should consider the UK as the exceptional case of high resilience to misinformation. Finally, we identify potential avenues to further develop frameworks to understand and measure resilience to misinformation.Cogitatio2022-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5346Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies; 169-1822183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5346https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5346/5346Copyright (c) 2022 Shelley Boulianne, Chris Tenove, Jordan Buffieinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBoulianne, ShelleyTenove, ChrisBuffie, Jordan2022-12-20T10:59:02Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5346Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:14.301197Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
title Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
spellingShingle Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
Boulianne, Shelley
Canada; comparative politics; France; misinformation; news media; political ideology; social media; United Kingdom; United States
title_short Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
title_full Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
title_fullStr Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
title_full_unstemmed Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
title_sort Complicating the Resilience Model: A Four-Country Study About Misinformation
author Boulianne, Shelley
author_facet Boulianne, Shelley
Tenove, Chris
Buffie, Jordan
author_role author
author2 Tenove, Chris
Buffie, Jordan
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boulianne, Shelley
Tenove, Chris
Buffie, Jordan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Canada; comparative politics; France; misinformation; news media; political ideology; social media; United Kingdom; United States
topic Canada; comparative politics; France; misinformation; news media; political ideology; social media; United Kingdom; United States
description The resilience model to disinformation (Humprecht et al., 2020, 2021) suggests that countries will differ in exposure and reactions to disinformation due to their distinct media, economic, and political environments. In this model, higher media trust and the use of public service broadcasters are expected to build resilience to disinformation, while social media use and political polarization undermine resilience. To further test and develop the resilience model, we draw on a four-country (the US, Canada, the UK, and France) survey conducted in February 2021. We focus on three individual-level indicators of a lack of resilience: awareness of, exposure to, and sharing of misinformation. We find that social media use is associated with higher levels of all three measures, which is consistent with the resilience model. Social media use decreases resilience to misinformation. Contrary to the expectations of the resilience model, trust in national news media does not build resilience. Finally, we consider the use of public broadcasting media (BBC, France Télévisions, and CBC). The use of these sources does not build resilience in the short term. Moving forward, we suggest that awareness of, exposure to, and reactions to misinformation are best understood in terms of social media use and left–right ideology. Furthermore, instead of focusing on the US as the exceptional case of low resilience, we should consider the UK as the exceptional case of high resilience to misinformation. Finally, we identify potential avenues to further develop frameworks to understand and measure resilience to misinformation.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5346
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5346
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5346/5346
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Shelley Boulianne, Chris Tenove, Jordan Buffie
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Shelley Boulianne, Chris Tenove, Jordan Buffie
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies; 169-182
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130659461005312