Global change in microcosms: environmental and societal predictors of land cover change on the Atlantic Ocean islands

• Autor(a) principal: Norder, Sietze J.
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: Lima, Ricardo F. de, Nascimento, Lea de, Lim, Jun Y., Fernández-Palacios, José María, Romeiras, Maria M., Elias, Rui Bento, Cabezas, Francisco J., Catarino, Luís, Ceríaco, Luis M. P., Castilla-Beltrán, Alvaro, Gabriel, Rosalina, Sequeira, Miguel Menezes de, Rijsdijk, Kenneth F., Nogué, Sandra, Kissling, W. Daniel, van Loon, E. Emiel, Hall, Marcus, Matos, Margarida, Borges, Paulo A. V.
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4172
• topic: Global biodiversity change; Social-ecological systems; Macaronesian islands; Topographic ruggedness; Deforestation; Qualitative-quantitative mixed-methods; .; Faculdade de Ciências da Vida

Islands contribute enormouslytoglobalbiodiversity,buttheir speciesandecosystems arehighly threatened and often confined to small patches of remaining native vegetation. Islands are thus ideal microcosms to study the local dimensions of global change. While human activities have drastically transformed most islands,the extentto which societal and environmental conditions shape differences in land cover remains unclear. This study analyses the role of contrasting environmental and societal conditions in affecting the extent of native vegetation cover on 30 islands in five Atlantic Ocean archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands, Cape Verde, Gulf of Guinea Islands). We adopt a mixed-method approach in which we combine a statistical analysis of environmental and societal variables with a qualitative reconstruction of historical socioeconomic trends. Statistical results indicate that terrain ruggedness predominantly shapes the extent of remainingnativevegetationcover, suggestingthattopography constrainshuman impactsonbiodiversity. Overall, environmental variables better explain differences in native vegetation cover between islands than societal variables like human population density. However, throughout history, islands experienced large changes in demography and socioeconomic trends, and therefore modern patterns of native vegetation might also partly reflect these past conditions. While anthropocene narratives often present humans as a global geophysicalforce,the results show thatlocal environmental context strongly mitigated the degree of human impact on biodiversity. These findings call for integrative approaches to understand the contributions of local human-environment interactions to ongoing global change