Superiority of 18F-FNa PET/CT for Detecting Bone Metastases in Comparison with Other Diagnostic Imaging Modalities

• Autor(a) principal: Lapa, Paula
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Outros Autores: Saraiva, Tiago, Silva, Rodolfo, Marques, Margarida, Costa, Gracinda, Lima, João Pedroso
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por; eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/7818
• topic: Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging; Bone Neoplasms/secondary Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radionuclide Imaging; Cintigrafia; Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem; Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário; Tomografia por Emissão de Positrões

Introduction: The 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography is being considered as an excellent imaging modalityfor bone metastases detection. This ability was compared with other imaging techniques.Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 114 patients who underwent 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/ computed tomography. Of these, 49 patients also had bone scintigraphy, 61 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography and 10 18F-FCH positron emission tomography/computed tomography. We identified the technique that detected the largest number of bone metastases. For the detection of skeletal metastases with the 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography study,the contribution of the positron emission tomography component was compared with the contribution of the computed tomography component. Cases in which 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone scintigraphy required further additional tests for diagnosis clarification were registered.Results: The 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography was superior to bone scintigraphy in 49% of the patients(p < 0.001); it was superior to 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 59% of the patients (p < 0.001) and it was superior to 18F-FCH positron emission tomography/computed tomography in 40% of the patients (p < 0.001). None of the compared imaging techniques were superior to 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The positron emission tomography component was superior to computed tomography in 35% of the cases (p < 0.001). Further investigation was suggested in only 3.5% of patients who underwent 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography (45% for bone scintigraphy) (p < 0.001).Discussion: As with other authors, our experience also confirms that 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography is an excellent imaging modality for the detection of bone metastases, detecting lesions in more patients and more lesions per patient.Conclusion: The 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography showed a superior ability for the detection of bone metastases when compared with bone scintigraphy, 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography and 18F-FCH positron emission tomography/computed tomography.