Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa,Ana C. Isabel Chora
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Jacinto,Margarida Maria Maia Leonardo Pimenta, Pires,Vitória Isabel Duarte, Abreu,Tiago Tribolet de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2019000100007
Resumo: Introduction: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has a well-established role in the prophylaxis of gastrointestinal bleeding in critically care patients; however, its use in non-intensive care patients is controversial. The authors proposed to evaluate the prescription of PPIs as gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis during hospitalization of non-critically ill patients, including the indication and costs. Material and Methods: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. All patients admitted to our medical department during a 31 day period were included. At the time of admission, a gastrointestinal bleeding risk score was completed by the attending physician. A score equal or greater than 10 points identified appropriateness of PPIs for prophylactic therapy. Costs with PPI use were collected on the study period. Results: During the study period, 115 patients were admitted, of which 99 were included in the study (54.5% women, mean age 76.2 years). Of the gastrointestinal bleeding risk factors assessed: 28.3% acute kidney injury, 10.1% liver disease, 20.2% sepsis, 40.4% prophylactic anticoagulation, and 30.3% coagulopathy. According to the score used, 67.7% of the patients were in low or low-medium risk and 32.4% in high-medium or high risk. During hospitalization, 59.6% of the patients received PPIs, 45.8% of which inappropriately according to the risk score. The total cost of PPIs use was 101.9€, with an inappropriate spending of 46.6€ during a 31 day period in our Internal Medicine department alone. Conclusion: PPIs use was prevalent in non-critically ill patients (59.6%), of which 45.8% were inappropriate, representing a problem associated with iatrogenic risk and economic impact.
id RCAP_6648d05af185b90651c6fd0e080a51bc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-671X2019000100007
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill PatientsGastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & controlPeptic Ulcer/prevention & controlProton Pump InhibitorsIntroduction: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has a well-established role in the prophylaxis of gastrointestinal bleeding in critically care patients; however, its use in non-intensive care patients is controversial. The authors proposed to evaluate the prescription of PPIs as gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis during hospitalization of non-critically ill patients, including the indication and costs. Material and Methods: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. All patients admitted to our medical department during a 31 day period were included. At the time of admission, a gastrointestinal bleeding risk score was completed by the attending physician. A score equal or greater than 10 points identified appropriateness of PPIs for prophylactic therapy. Costs with PPI use were collected on the study period. Results: During the study period, 115 patients were admitted, of which 99 were included in the study (54.5% women, mean age 76.2 years). Of the gastrointestinal bleeding risk factors assessed: 28.3% acute kidney injury, 10.1% liver disease, 20.2% sepsis, 40.4% prophylactic anticoagulation, and 30.3% coagulopathy. According to the score used, 67.7% of the patients were in low or low-medium risk and 32.4% in high-medium or high risk. During hospitalization, 59.6% of the patients received PPIs, 45.8% of which inappropriately according to the risk score. The total cost of PPIs use was 101.9€, with an inappropriate spending of 46.6€ during a 31 day period in our Internal Medicine department alone. Conclusion: PPIs use was prevalent in non-critically ill patients (59.6%), of which 45.8% were inappropriate, representing a problem associated with iatrogenic risk and economic impact.Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2019000100007Medicina Interna v.26 n.1 2019reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2019000100007Sousa,Ana C. Isabel ChoraJacinto,Margarida Maria Maia Leonardo PimentaPires,Vitória Isabel DuarteAbreu,Tiago Tribolet deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:08:15Zoai:scielo:S0872-671X2019000100007Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:20:48.915112Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
title Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
spellingShingle Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
Sousa,Ana C. Isabel Chora
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control
Peptic Ulcer/prevention & control
Proton Pump Inhibitors
title_short Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
title_full Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
title_fullStr Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
title_full_unstemmed Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
title_sort Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Non-Critically Ill Patients
author Sousa,Ana C. Isabel Chora
author_facet Sousa,Ana C. Isabel Chora
Jacinto,Margarida Maria Maia Leonardo Pimenta
Pires,Vitória Isabel Duarte
Abreu,Tiago Tribolet de
author_role author
author2 Jacinto,Margarida Maria Maia Leonardo Pimenta
Pires,Vitória Isabel Duarte
Abreu,Tiago Tribolet de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa,Ana C. Isabel Chora
Jacinto,Margarida Maria Maia Leonardo Pimenta
Pires,Vitória Isabel Duarte
Abreu,Tiago Tribolet de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control
Peptic Ulcer/prevention & control
Proton Pump Inhibitors
topic Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control
Peptic Ulcer/prevention & control
Proton Pump Inhibitors
description Introduction: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has a well-established role in the prophylaxis of gastrointestinal bleeding in critically care patients; however, its use in non-intensive care patients is controversial. The authors proposed to evaluate the prescription of PPIs as gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis during hospitalization of non-critically ill patients, including the indication and costs. Material and Methods: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. All patients admitted to our medical department during a 31 day period were included. At the time of admission, a gastrointestinal bleeding risk score was completed by the attending physician. A score equal or greater than 10 points identified appropriateness of PPIs for prophylactic therapy. Costs with PPI use were collected on the study period. Results: During the study period, 115 patients were admitted, of which 99 were included in the study (54.5% women, mean age 76.2 years). Of the gastrointestinal bleeding risk factors assessed: 28.3% acute kidney injury, 10.1% liver disease, 20.2% sepsis, 40.4% prophylactic anticoagulation, and 30.3% coagulopathy. According to the score used, 67.7% of the patients were in low or low-medium risk and 32.4% in high-medium or high risk. During hospitalization, 59.6% of the patients received PPIs, 45.8% of which inappropriately according to the risk score. The total cost of PPIs use was 101.9€, with an inappropriate spending of 46.6€ during a 31 day period in our Internal Medicine department alone. Conclusion: PPIs use was prevalent in non-critically ill patients (59.6%), of which 45.8% were inappropriate, representing a problem associated with iatrogenic risk and economic impact.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2019000100007
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2019000100007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-671X2019000100007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Interna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Medicina Interna v.26 n.1 2019
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137295345909760