Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608 |
Resumo: | The promotion of Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development is one of the 169 targets of the 2030 Agenda, and considered a key means of implementation. The 2030 Agenda, while noble and necessary to put humanity on a sustainable path, has vastly exacerbated the complexity and ambiguity of development policymaking. This article challenges two assumptions that are common in both policy discussions and associated scholarly debates: First, the technocratic belief that policy coherence is an authentically attainable objective; and second, whether efforts to improve the coherence within and across policies makes achieving the Sustainable Development Goals more likely. We unpack the conventional ‘win-win’ understanding of the policy coherence concept to illustrate that fundamentally incompatible political interests continue to shape global development, and that these cannot be managed away. We argue that heuristic, problem-driven frameworks are needed to promote coherence in settings where these fundamental inconsistencies are likely to persist. Instead of mapping synergies ex-ante, future research and policy debates should focus on navigating political trade-offs and hierarchies while confronting the longer-term goal conflicts that reproduce unsustainable policy choices. |
id |
RCAP_66e735f289ea55f03ba6e65dafd8a5d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3608 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics2030 agenda; European Union; development policy; policy coherence; policy trade-offs; Sustainable Development GoalsThe promotion of Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development is one of the 169 targets of the 2030 Agenda, and considered a key means of implementation. The 2030 Agenda, while noble and necessary to put humanity on a sustainable path, has vastly exacerbated the complexity and ambiguity of development policymaking. This article challenges two assumptions that are common in both policy discussions and associated scholarly debates: First, the technocratic belief that policy coherence is an authentically attainable objective; and second, whether efforts to improve the coherence within and across policies makes achieving the Sustainable Development Goals more likely. We unpack the conventional ‘win-win’ understanding of the policy coherence concept to illustrate that fundamentally incompatible political interests continue to shape global development, and that these cannot be managed away. We argue that heuristic, problem-driven frameworks are needed to promote coherence in settings where these fundamental inconsistencies are likely to persist. Instead of mapping synergies ex-ante, future research and policy debates should focus on navigating political trade-offs and hierarchies while confronting the longer-term goal conflicts that reproduce unsustainable policy choices.Cogitatio2021-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3608Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Transformative Change through Sustainable Development Goals?; 108-1182183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3608https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3608/3608Copyright (c) 2021 Alexander Brand, Mark Furness, Niels Keijzerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrand, AlexanderFurness, MarkKeijzer, Niels2022-12-22T15:16:28Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3608Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:24.778923Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics |
title |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics |
spellingShingle |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics Brand, Alexander 2030 agenda; European Union; development policy; policy coherence; policy trade-offs; Sustainable Development Goals |
title_short |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics |
title_full |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics |
title_fullStr |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics |
title_sort |
Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics |
author |
Brand, Alexander |
author_facet |
Brand, Alexander Furness, Mark Keijzer, Niels |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Furness, Mark Keijzer, Niels |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brand, Alexander Furness, Mark Keijzer, Niels |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
2030 agenda; European Union; development policy; policy coherence; policy trade-offs; Sustainable Development Goals |
topic |
2030 agenda; European Union; development policy; policy coherence; policy trade-offs; Sustainable Development Goals |
description |
The promotion of Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development is one of the 169 targets of the 2030 Agenda, and considered a key means of implementation. The 2030 Agenda, while noble and necessary to put humanity on a sustainable path, has vastly exacerbated the complexity and ambiguity of development policymaking. This article challenges two assumptions that are common in both policy discussions and associated scholarly debates: First, the technocratic belief that policy coherence is an authentically attainable objective; and second, whether efforts to improve the coherence within and across policies makes achieving the Sustainable Development Goals more likely. We unpack the conventional ‘win-win’ understanding of the policy coherence concept to illustrate that fundamentally incompatible political interests continue to shape global development, and that these cannot be managed away. We argue that heuristic, problem-driven frameworks are needed to promote coherence in settings where these fundamental inconsistencies are likely to persist. Instead of mapping synergies ex-ante, future research and policy debates should focus on navigating political trade-offs and hierarchies while confronting the longer-term goal conflicts that reproduce unsustainable policy choices. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3608 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3608 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3608 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3608/3608 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alexander Brand, Mark Furness, Niels Keijzer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alexander Brand, Mark Furness, Niels Keijzer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 1 (2021): The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Transformative Change through Sustainable Development Goals?; 108-118 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130669624852480 |