A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3569 |
Resumo: | Background: Velocity and acceleration have been highlighted as the most critical variables in soccer. However, there is a consensus gap in defining different levels of effort. Aim: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify if it is a consensus in those articles that proposed a threshold to establish (i) movement intensity at different velocities using tracking systems and (ii) accelerations using inertial measure ment units, classifying the justification methods. Method: A systematic review of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Of the 1983 studies initially identified, 39 were thoroughly reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Conclusion: The 40-m maximal linear sprint and physical fitness tests are the most commonly used methods to generate speed and acceleration thresholds in soccer. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in locomotor test procedures and workload zones established from these performance data. Studies diverged when considering the use of individualized thresholds. The low sampling rate (≤ 10 Hz) in the publications calculating acceleration and deceleration demands should also be interpreted cautiously. The present study collected evidence to help professionals process and interpret external load data. More interventional work is needed to confirm the value of fitness-based individualizations. |
id |
RCAP_6754898cdf61a0ea08703277d9121094 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/3569 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccerGlobal positioning systemInertial measurement unitPerformance analysisSpeedSprintTeam sportBackground: Velocity and acceleration have been highlighted as the most critical variables in soccer. However, there is a consensus gap in defining different levels of effort. Aim: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify if it is a consensus in those articles that proposed a threshold to establish (i) movement intensity at different velocities using tracking systems and (ii) accelerations using inertial measure ment units, classifying the justification methods. Method: A systematic review of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Of the 1983 studies initially identified, 39 were thoroughly reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Conclusion: The 40-m maximal linear sprint and physical fitness tests are the most commonly used methods to generate speed and acceleration thresholds in soccer. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in locomotor test procedures and workload zones established from these performance data. Studies diverged when considering the use of individualized thresholds. The low sampling rate (≤ 10 Hz) in the publications calculating acceleration and deceleration demands should also be interpreted cautiously. The present study collected evidence to help professionals process and interpret external load data. More interventional work is needed to confirm the value of fitness-based individualizations.2023-10-23T11:28:31Z2022-12-08T00:00:00Z2022-12-082023-06-27T00:47:59Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3569eng2048-397X (online)1747-954110.1177/17479541221143346Díaz-Soto, Francisco JavierRico-González, MarkelVieira, Luiz H PalucciClemente, Filipe ManuelNobari, HadiPino-Ortega, Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-26T08:24:22Zoai:repositorio.ipvc.pt:20.500.11960/3569Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:39:40.614402Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer |
title |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer |
spellingShingle |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer Díaz-Soto, Francisco Javier Global positioning system Inertial measurement unit Performance analysis Speed Sprint Team sport |
title_short |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer |
title_full |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer |
title_fullStr |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer |
title_sort |
A systematic review of velocity and accelerometer thresholds in soccer |
author |
Díaz-Soto, Francisco Javier |
author_facet |
Díaz-Soto, Francisco Javier Rico-González, Markel Vieira, Luiz H Palucci Clemente, Filipe Manuel Nobari, Hadi Pino-Ortega, José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rico-González, Markel Vieira, Luiz H Palucci Clemente, Filipe Manuel Nobari, Hadi Pino-Ortega, José |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Díaz-Soto, Francisco Javier Rico-González, Markel Vieira, Luiz H Palucci Clemente, Filipe Manuel Nobari, Hadi Pino-Ortega, José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Global positioning system Inertial measurement unit Performance analysis Speed Sprint Team sport |
topic |
Global positioning system Inertial measurement unit Performance analysis Speed Sprint Team sport |
description |
Background: Velocity and acceleration have been highlighted as the most critical variables in soccer. However, there is a consensus gap in defining different levels of effort. Aim: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify if it is a consensus in those articles that proposed a threshold to establish (i) movement intensity at different velocities using tracking systems and (ii) accelerations using inertial measure ment units, classifying the justification methods. Method: A systematic review of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Of the 1983 studies initially identified, 39 were thoroughly reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Conclusion: The 40-m maximal linear sprint and physical fitness tests are the most commonly used methods to generate speed and acceleration thresholds in soccer. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in locomotor test procedures and workload zones established from these performance data. Studies diverged when considering the use of individualized thresholds. The low sampling rate (≤ 10 Hz) in the publications calculating acceleration and deceleration demands should also be interpreted cautiously. The present study collected evidence to help professionals process and interpret external load data. More interventional work is needed to confirm the value of fitness-based individualizations. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-08T00:00:00Z 2022-12-08 2023-10-23T11:28:31Z 2023-06-27T00:47:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3569 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/3569 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2048-397X (online) 1747-9541 10.1177/17479541221143346 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133658028703744 |