Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, João Amaral
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Quelhas, Ana Cristina, Juhos, Csongor, Couto, Marta Barley de La Cueva, Rasga, Célia Maria Batalha Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3622
Resumo: In two different studies we examined the focus effect of a scenario (i.e., the fact that a given character is the protagonist of a story) on two interconnected domains: the generation of counterfactual thoughts and the ascription of blame. It was hypothesised that being the focal agent of a story would not only lead to more counterfactuals centred on him or her, but also to greater ascriptions of blame as it would be easier to imagine how that actor could have behaved differently had he chosen or wanted to, and thus avoided a deleterious outcome. Different negatively-valenced scenarios depicting a certain misfortune such as a mugging were created in which victim, perpetrator or both characters, were the centre of the story. Results showed that placing either victim or perpetrator as the protagonist of a scenario increases the number of counterfactual thoughts centred on that character, but does not necessarily increase the blame attributed to him or her as the perpetrator was always ascribed more blame than the victim, irrespective of who was the protagonist. Study 2’s findings replicate those of Study 1 even with a different experimental design, modified materials, and various counterbalancing measures, hence suggesting that being the protagonist enables one to easily consider counterfactual alternatives involving that actor, but does not prevent one from identifying who is rightfully to blame for a given misfortune. The results and their implications were interpreted according to different theoretical perspectives and possible future avenues of research are discussed.
id RCAP_6854b7b253ed2c83939a1a5208b5f0fc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/3622
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetratorCounterfactual thinkingFocusMutabilityBlameIn two different studies we examined the focus effect of a scenario (i.e., the fact that a given character is the protagonist of a story) on two interconnected domains: the generation of counterfactual thoughts and the ascription of blame. It was hypothesised that being the focal agent of a story would not only lead to more counterfactuals centred on him or her, but also to greater ascriptions of blame as it would be easier to imagine how that actor could have behaved differently had he chosen or wanted to, and thus avoided a deleterious outcome. Different negatively-valenced scenarios depicting a certain misfortune such as a mugging were created in which victim, perpetrator or both characters, were the centre of the story. Results showed that placing either victim or perpetrator as the protagonist of a scenario increases the number of counterfactual thoughts centred on that character, but does not necessarily increase the blame attributed to him or her as the perpetrator was always ascribed more blame than the victim, irrespective of who was the protagonist. Study 2’s findings replicate those of Study 1 even with a different experimental design, modified materials, and various counterbalancing measures, hence suggesting that being the protagonist enables one to easily consider counterfactual alternatives involving that actor, but does not prevent one from identifying who is rightfully to blame for a given misfortune. The results and their implications were interpreted according to different theoretical perspectives and possible future avenues of research are discussed.Instituto Superior de Psicologia AplicadaRepositório do ISPAMarques, João AmaralQuelhas, Ana CristinaJuhos, CsongorCouto, Marta Barley de La CuevaRasga, Célia Maria Batalha Silva2015-05-04T18:13:17Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3622engAnálise Psicológica, 32, 355-3850870-823110.14417/ap.952info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:39:27Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/3622Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:21:30.605814Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
title Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
spellingShingle Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
Marques, João Amaral
Counterfactual thinking
Focus
Mutability
Blame
title_short Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
title_full Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
title_fullStr Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
title_full_unstemmed Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
title_sort Counterfactual thinking : Study of the focus effect of scenarios and blame ascriptions to victim and perpetrator
author Marques, João Amaral
author_facet Marques, João Amaral
Quelhas, Ana Cristina
Juhos, Csongor
Couto, Marta Barley de La Cueva
Rasga, Célia Maria Batalha Silva
author_role author
author2 Quelhas, Ana Cristina
Juhos, Csongor
Couto, Marta Barley de La Cueva
Rasga, Célia Maria Batalha Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do ISPA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, João Amaral
Quelhas, Ana Cristina
Juhos, Csongor
Couto, Marta Barley de La Cueva
Rasga, Célia Maria Batalha Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Counterfactual thinking
Focus
Mutability
Blame
topic Counterfactual thinking
Focus
Mutability
Blame
description In two different studies we examined the focus effect of a scenario (i.e., the fact that a given character is the protagonist of a story) on two interconnected domains: the generation of counterfactual thoughts and the ascription of blame. It was hypothesised that being the focal agent of a story would not only lead to more counterfactuals centred on him or her, but also to greater ascriptions of blame as it would be easier to imagine how that actor could have behaved differently had he chosen or wanted to, and thus avoided a deleterious outcome. Different negatively-valenced scenarios depicting a certain misfortune such as a mugging were created in which victim, perpetrator or both characters, were the centre of the story. Results showed that placing either victim or perpetrator as the protagonist of a scenario increases the number of counterfactual thoughts centred on that character, but does not necessarily increase the blame attributed to him or her as the perpetrator was always ascribed more blame than the victim, irrespective of who was the protagonist. Study 2’s findings replicate those of Study 1 even with a different experimental design, modified materials, and various counterbalancing measures, hence suggesting that being the protagonist enables one to easily consider counterfactual alternatives involving that actor, but does not prevent one from identifying who is rightfully to blame for a given misfortune. The results and their implications were interpreted according to different theoretical perspectives and possible future avenues of research are discussed.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015-05-04T18:13:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3622
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/3622
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Análise Psicológica, 32, 355-385
0870-8231
10.14417/ap.952
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130076294414336