Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira, Diogo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lopes, Jorge, Sousa, Ana Cristina, Costa, Miguel, O. Ferreira, Eduardo, Baptista, Armando, Varela, Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190
Resumo: Introduction: Teledermatology (store and forward) has been used to improve priority screening for hospital consultations and to respond, in a minority of cases, to simple situations. The Dermatology consultation request via Consulta Tempo e Horas must now be accompanied by clinical photo(s), according to Despacho 6280/2018 of 28 June 2018. We intend to evaluate the satisfaction of patients and family doctors regarding teledermatology consultation. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out on patients subjected to teledermatology consultation during the 1st quarter of 2018, with a retrospective analysis of the clinical record. An online survey was also carried out on family doctors belonging to the Agrupamentos de Centros de SaúdeACeS of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho reference area. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, response was obtained in 27.5% (n = 42). Pigmented lesions corresponded to 54.8% (n=23) of the total consultations. Treatment was proposed in 42.9% (n=18). Patients would prefer in-person consultation in 90.2% (n=38) of cases. Eighty-two responses were obtained from family doctors. Half of the responders agree with the mandatory attachment of clinical photos to the consultation request, even if this leads to an increase of 11.21 ± 8.84 minutes to the request time. When a teledermatology consultation is made, 47.6% (n=39) of family doctors report that the patient's problem is only partially treated. Conclusion: Teledermatology consultation (store and forward) only solves a minority of clinical situations. Furthermore, it is not considered a satisfactory solution for patients.
id RCAP_692c9ea40ff645f1d800f9c04de7f831
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/EGrau de Satisfação do Doente e do MGF com a Consulta de Teledermatologia do CHVNG/EDermatologyPhysicians, FamilyRemote ConsultationTelemedicineConsulta RemotaDermatologiaMédicos de FamíliaTelemedicinaIntroduction: Teledermatology (store and forward) has been used to improve priority screening for hospital consultations and to respond, in a minority of cases, to simple situations. The Dermatology consultation request via Consulta Tempo e Horas must now be accompanied by clinical photo(s), according to Despacho 6280/2018 of 28 June 2018. We intend to evaluate the satisfaction of patients and family doctors regarding teledermatology consultation. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out on patients subjected to teledermatology consultation during the 1st quarter of 2018, with a retrospective analysis of the clinical record. An online survey was also carried out on family doctors belonging to the Agrupamentos de Centros de SaúdeACeS of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho reference area. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, response was obtained in 27.5% (n = 42). Pigmented lesions corresponded to 54.8% (n=23) of the total consultations. Treatment was proposed in 42.9% (n=18). Patients would prefer in-person consultation in 90.2% (n=38) of cases. Eighty-two responses were obtained from family doctors. Half of the responders agree with the mandatory attachment of clinical photos to the consultation request, even if this leads to an increase of 11.21 ± 8.84 minutes to the request time. When a teledermatology consultation is made, 47.6% (n=39) of family doctors report that the patient's problem is only partially treated. Conclusion: Teledermatology consultation (store and forward) only solves a minority of clinical situations. Furthermore, it is not considered a satisfactory solution for patients.Introdução: A Teledermatologia (store and forward) tem sido usada para melhorar a triagem de pedidos no âmbito do Serviço Nacional de Saúde, e para dar resposta, numa minoria de casos, a situações simples. O pedido de consulta de Dermatologia via Consulta Tempo e Horas passou a ser obrigatoriamente acompanhado de foto(s) clínica(s), de acordo com o Despacho 6280/2018 de 28 de junho de 2018. Pretendemos avaliar a satisfação de doentes e médicos de família relativamente à consulta de teledermatologia em tempo diferido. Material e Métodos: Foi realizado um inquérito aos doentes sujeitos a consulta de teledermatologia durante o primeiro trimestre de 2018, com posterior análise retrospetiva do registo clínico. Foi também realizado um inquérito online aos médicos de Medicina Geral e Familiar pertencentes aos Agrupamentos de Centros de Saúde da área de referência do Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho. Resultados: Dos 153 doentes inquiridos, obteve-se resposta em 27,5% (n=42). Lesões pigmentadas corresponderam a 54,8% (n=23) do total das consultas. Foi proposto tratamento em 42,9% (n=18). Os doentes referiram preferir a consulta presencial em 90,2% (n=38). Obtiveram-se 82 respostas por parte dos médicos de família. Metade dos inquiridos concorda com a obrigatoriedade de anexação de fotografias clínicas, ainda que esta leva a um acréscimo de 11.21 ± 8.84 minutos ao tempo de referenciação. Quando é feita uma consulta de Teledermatologia, 47,6% (n=39) dos médicos referem que o problema do doente fica apenas parcialmente tratado. Conclusão: A utilização da Teledermatologia para consulta não presencial apenas resolve uma minoria das situações clínicas e não se apresenta como uma medida satisfatória para os doentes.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2020-09-27T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 3 (2020): July - September; 221-227Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 3 (2020): Julho - Setembro; 221-2272182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190/848Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereologyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, DiogoLopes, JorgeSousa, Ana CristinaCosta, MiguelO. Ferreira, EduardoBaptista, ArmandoVarela, Paulo2022-10-06T12:35:14Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:15.887973Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
Grau de Satisfação do Doente e do MGF com a Consulta de Teledermatologia do CHVNG/E
title Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
spellingShingle Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
Teixeira, Diogo
Dermatology
Physicians, Family
Remote Consultation
Telemedicine
Consulta Remota
Dermatologia
Médicos de Família
Telemedicina
title_short Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
title_full Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
title_fullStr Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
title_full_unstemmed Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
title_sort Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
author Teixeira, Diogo
author_facet Teixeira, Diogo
Lopes, Jorge
Sousa, Ana Cristina
Costa, Miguel
O. Ferreira, Eduardo
Baptista, Armando
Varela, Paulo
author_role author
author2 Lopes, Jorge
Sousa, Ana Cristina
Costa, Miguel
O. Ferreira, Eduardo
Baptista, Armando
Varela, Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira, Diogo
Lopes, Jorge
Sousa, Ana Cristina
Costa, Miguel
O. Ferreira, Eduardo
Baptista, Armando
Varela, Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dermatology
Physicians, Family
Remote Consultation
Telemedicine
Consulta Remota
Dermatologia
Médicos de Família
Telemedicina
topic Dermatology
Physicians, Family
Remote Consultation
Telemedicine
Consulta Remota
Dermatologia
Médicos de Família
Telemedicina
description Introduction: Teledermatology (store and forward) has been used to improve priority screening for hospital consultations and to respond, in a minority of cases, to simple situations. The Dermatology consultation request via Consulta Tempo e Horas must now be accompanied by clinical photo(s), according to Despacho 6280/2018 of 28 June 2018. We intend to evaluate the satisfaction of patients and family doctors regarding teledermatology consultation. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out on patients subjected to teledermatology consultation during the 1st quarter of 2018, with a retrospective analysis of the clinical record. An online survey was also carried out on family doctors belonging to the Agrupamentos de Centros de SaúdeACeS of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho reference area. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, response was obtained in 27.5% (n = 42). Pigmented lesions corresponded to 54.8% (n=23) of the total consultations. Treatment was proposed in 42.9% (n=18). Patients would prefer in-person consultation in 90.2% (n=38) of cases. Eighty-two responses were obtained from family doctors. Half of the responders agree with the mandatory attachment of clinical photos to the consultation request, even if this leads to an increase of 11.21 ± 8.84 minutes to the request time. When a teledermatology consultation is made, 47.6% (n=39) of family doctors report that the patient's problem is only partially treated. Conclusion: Teledermatology consultation (store and forward) only solves a minority of clinical situations. Furthermore, it is not considered a satisfactory solution for patients.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-27T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190
url https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190/848
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 3 (2020): July - September; 221-227
Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 3 (2020): Julho - Setembro; 221-227
2182-2409
2182-2395
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130568430977024