Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Teledermatology (store and forward) has been used to improve priority screening for hospital consultations and to respond, in a minority of cases, to simple situations. The Dermatology consultation request via Consulta Tempo e Horas must now be accompanied by clinical photo(s), according to Despacho 6280/2018 of 28 June 2018. We intend to evaluate the satisfaction of patients and family doctors regarding teledermatology consultation. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out on patients subjected to teledermatology consultation during the 1st quarter of 2018, with a retrospective analysis of the clinical record. An online survey was also carried out on family doctors belonging to the Agrupamentos de Centros de SaúdeACeS of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho reference area. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, response was obtained in 27.5% (n = 42). Pigmented lesions corresponded to 54.8% (n=23) of the total consultations. Treatment was proposed in 42.9% (n=18). Patients would prefer in-person consultation in 90.2% (n=38) of cases. Eighty-two responses were obtained from family doctors. Half of the responders agree with the mandatory attachment of clinical photos to the consultation request, even if this leads to an increase of 11.21 ± 8.84 minutes to the request time. When a teledermatology consultation is made, 47.6% (n=39) of family doctors report that the patient's problem is only partially treated. Conclusion: Teledermatology consultation (store and forward) only solves a minority of clinical situations. Furthermore, it is not considered a satisfactory solution for patients. |
id |
RCAP_692c9ea40ff645f1d800f9c04de7f831 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/EGrau de Satisfação do Doente e do MGF com a Consulta de Teledermatologia do CHVNG/EDermatologyPhysicians, FamilyRemote ConsultationTelemedicineConsulta RemotaDermatologiaMédicos de FamíliaTelemedicinaIntroduction: Teledermatology (store and forward) has been used to improve priority screening for hospital consultations and to respond, in a minority of cases, to simple situations. The Dermatology consultation request via Consulta Tempo e Horas must now be accompanied by clinical photo(s), according to Despacho 6280/2018 of 28 June 2018. We intend to evaluate the satisfaction of patients and family doctors regarding teledermatology consultation. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out on patients subjected to teledermatology consultation during the 1st quarter of 2018, with a retrospective analysis of the clinical record. An online survey was also carried out on family doctors belonging to the Agrupamentos de Centros de SaúdeACeS of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho reference area. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, response was obtained in 27.5% (n = 42). Pigmented lesions corresponded to 54.8% (n=23) of the total consultations. Treatment was proposed in 42.9% (n=18). Patients would prefer in-person consultation in 90.2% (n=38) of cases. Eighty-two responses were obtained from family doctors. Half of the responders agree with the mandatory attachment of clinical photos to the consultation request, even if this leads to an increase of 11.21 ± 8.84 minutes to the request time. When a teledermatology consultation is made, 47.6% (n=39) of family doctors report that the patient's problem is only partially treated. Conclusion: Teledermatology consultation (store and forward) only solves a minority of clinical situations. Furthermore, it is not considered a satisfactory solution for patients.Introdução: A Teledermatologia (store and forward) tem sido usada para melhorar a triagem de pedidos no âmbito do Serviço Nacional de Saúde, e para dar resposta, numa minoria de casos, a situações simples. O pedido de consulta de Dermatologia via Consulta Tempo e Horas passou a ser obrigatoriamente acompanhado de foto(s) clínica(s), de acordo com o Despacho 6280/2018 de 28 de junho de 2018. Pretendemos avaliar a satisfação de doentes e médicos de família relativamente à consulta de teledermatologia em tempo diferido. Material e Métodos: Foi realizado um inquérito aos doentes sujeitos a consulta de teledermatologia durante o primeiro trimestre de 2018, com posterior análise retrospetiva do registo clínico. Foi também realizado um inquérito online aos médicos de Medicina Geral e Familiar pertencentes aos Agrupamentos de Centros de Saúde da área de referência do Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho. Resultados: Dos 153 doentes inquiridos, obteve-se resposta em 27,5% (n=42). Lesões pigmentadas corresponderam a 54,8% (n=23) do total das consultas. Foi proposto tratamento em 42,9% (n=18). Os doentes referiram preferir a consulta presencial em 90,2% (n=38). Obtiveram-se 82 respostas por parte dos médicos de família. Metade dos inquiridos concorda com a obrigatoriedade de anexação de fotografias clínicas, ainda que esta leva a um acréscimo de 11.21 ± 8.84 minutos ao tempo de referenciação. Quando é feita uma consulta de Teledermatologia, 47,6% (n=39) dos médicos referem que o problema do doente fica apenas parcialmente tratado. Conclusão: A utilização da Teledermatologia para consulta não presencial apenas resolve uma minoria das situações clínicas e não se apresenta como uma medida satisfatória para os doentes.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2020-09-27T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 3 (2020): July - September; 221-227Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 3 (2020): Julho - Setembro; 221-2272182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190/848Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereologyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, DiogoLopes, JorgeSousa, Ana CristinaCosta, MiguelO. Ferreira, EduardoBaptista, ArmandoVarela, Paulo2022-10-06T12:35:14Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:15.887973Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E Grau de Satisfação do Doente e do MGF com a Consulta de Teledermatologia do CHVNG/E |
title |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E |
spellingShingle |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E Teixeira, Diogo Dermatology Physicians, Family Remote Consultation Telemedicine Consulta Remota Dermatologia Médicos de Família Telemedicina |
title_short |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E |
title_full |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E |
title_fullStr |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E |
title_sort |
Patient and Family Doctor Satisfaction with Teledermatology Consultations in CHVNG/E |
author |
Teixeira, Diogo |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Diogo Lopes, Jorge Sousa, Ana Cristina Costa, Miguel O. Ferreira, Eduardo Baptista, Armando Varela, Paulo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes, Jorge Sousa, Ana Cristina Costa, Miguel O. Ferreira, Eduardo Baptista, Armando Varela, Paulo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Diogo Lopes, Jorge Sousa, Ana Cristina Costa, Miguel O. Ferreira, Eduardo Baptista, Armando Varela, Paulo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dermatology Physicians, Family Remote Consultation Telemedicine Consulta Remota Dermatologia Médicos de Família Telemedicina |
topic |
Dermatology Physicians, Family Remote Consultation Telemedicine Consulta Remota Dermatologia Médicos de Família Telemedicina |
description |
Introduction: Teledermatology (store and forward) has been used to improve priority screening for hospital consultations and to respond, in a minority of cases, to simple situations. The Dermatology consultation request via Consulta Tempo e Horas must now be accompanied by clinical photo(s), according to Despacho 6280/2018 of 28 June 2018. We intend to evaluate the satisfaction of patients and family doctors regarding teledermatology consultation. Material and Methods: A survey was carried out on patients subjected to teledermatology consultation during the 1st quarter of 2018, with a retrospective analysis of the clinical record. An online survey was also carried out on family doctors belonging to the Agrupamentos de Centros de SaúdeACeS of the Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho reference area. Results: Of the 153 patients surveyed, response was obtained in 27.5% (n = 42). Pigmented lesions corresponded to 54.8% (n=23) of the total consultations. Treatment was proposed in 42.9% (n=18). Patients would prefer in-person consultation in 90.2% (n=38) of cases. Eighty-two responses were obtained from family doctors. Half of the responders agree with the mandatory attachment of clinical photos to the consultation request, even if this leads to an increase of 11.21 ± 8.84 minutes to the request time. When a teledermatology consultation is made, 47.6% (n=39) of family doctors report that the patient's problem is only partially treated. Conclusion: Teledermatology consultation (store and forward) only solves a minority of clinical situations. Furthermore, it is not considered a satisfactory solution for patients. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-27T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190 oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/1190 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190 https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.78.3.1190 https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/1190/848 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 78 No 3 (2020): July - September; 221-227 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 78 n. 3 (2020): Julho - Setembro; 221-227 2182-2409 2182-2395 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130568430977024 |