Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904 |
Resumo: | While some research addresses the relationship between religiosity and political attitudes, little is known about the relationship between religion, conspiracy beliefs, and political culture. Using the concept of authoritarianism, we hypothesise that a conspiracy mentality is likely to be associated with ethnocentric and anti‐democratic attitudes, just as some types of religion—e.g., religious fundamentalism—have a close affinity to authoritarian attitudes. Using data from an online UK survey (N = 1093; quota sample, representative of education, gender, age, and region), we enquire to what extent belief in conspiracy theories is associated with xenophobic, racist, and anti‐democratic attitudes, which aspects of religiosity in combination with other factors play a role in conspiracy beliefs, and which communicative and interpretative practices are associated with belief in conspiracy ideologies. Our analysis reveals that both belief in classical conspiracy theories and belief in Covid‐19 conspiracy theories are significantly related to anti‐Muslim sentiments, anti‐Black racism, and right‐wing extremism. Moreover, a regression analysis shows that an initially discovered relationship between the strength of religiosity and conspiracy mentality disappears once religious fundamentalism is included in the model. The effect of religious fundamentalism is moderated by narcissism and the style of social media use—namely, trusting posts made by one’s friends more than the opinions of experts. |
id |
RCAP_695b0774986571759d28f989da1140c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UKauthoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social mediaWhile some research addresses the relationship between religiosity and political attitudes, little is known about the relationship between religion, conspiracy beliefs, and political culture. Using the concept of authoritarianism, we hypothesise that a conspiracy mentality is likely to be associated with ethnocentric and anti‐democratic attitudes, just as some types of religion—e.g., religious fundamentalism—have a close affinity to authoritarian attitudes. Using data from an online UK survey (N = 1093; quota sample, representative of education, gender, age, and region), we enquire to what extent belief in conspiracy theories is associated with xenophobic, racist, and anti‐democratic attitudes, which aspects of religiosity in combination with other factors play a role in conspiracy beliefs, and which communicative and interpretative practices are associated with belief in conspiracy ideologies. Our analysis reveals that both belief in classical conspiracy theories and belief in Covid‐19 conspiracy theories are significantly related to anti‐Muslim sentiments, anti‐Black racism, and right‐wing extremism. Moreover, a regression analysis shows that an initially discovered relationship between the strength of religiosity and conspiracy mentality disappears once religious fundamentalism is included in the model. The effect of religious fundamentalism is moderated by narcissism and the style of social media use—namely, trusting posts made by one’s friends more than the opinions of experts.Cogitatio2022-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes; 229-2422183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904/5904https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5904/2677Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Yendell, David Herbertinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYendell, AlexanderHerbert, David2022-12-22T15:16:26Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:23.485038Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK |
title |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK |
spellingShingle |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK Yendell, Alexander authoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social media |
title_short |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK |
title_full |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK |
title_fullStr |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK |
title_full_unstemmed |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK |
title_sort |
Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK |
author |
Yendell, Alexander |
author_facet |
Yendell, Alexander Herbert, David |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Herbert, David |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Yendell, Alexander Herbert, David |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
authoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social media |
topic |
authoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social media |
description |
While some research addresses the relationship between religiosity and political attitudes, little is known about the relationship between religion, conspiracy beliefs, and political culture. Using the concept of authoritarianism, we hypothesise that a conspiracy mentality is likely to be associated with ethnocentric and anti‐democratic attitudes, just as some types of religion—e.g., religious fundamentalism—have a close affinity to authoritarian attitudes. Using data from an online UK survey (N = 1093; quota sample, representative of education, gender, age, and region), we enquire to what extent belief in conspiracy theories is associated with xenophobic, racist, and anti‐democratic attitudes, which aspects of religiosity in combination with other factors play a role in conspiracy beliefs, and which communicative and interpretative practices are associated with belief in conspiracy ideologies. Our analysis reveals that both belief in classical conspiracy theories and belief in Covid‐19 conspiracy theories are significantly related to anti‐Muslim sentiments, anti‐Black racism, and right‐wing extremism. Moreover, a regression analysis shows that an initially discovered relationship between the strength of religiosity and conspiracy mentality disappears once religious fundamentalism is included in the model. The effect of religious fundamentalism is moderated by narcissism and the style of social media use—namely, trusting posts made by one’s friends more than the opinions of experts. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-24 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904/5904 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5904/2677 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Yendell, David Herbert info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Yendell, David Herbert |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes; 229-242 2183-2463 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130669578715136 |