Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yendell, Alexander
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Herbert, David
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904
Resumo: While some research addresses the relationship between religiosity and political attitudes, little is known about the relationship between religion, conspiracy beliefs, and political culture. Using the concept of authoritarianism, we hypothesise that a conspiracy mentality is likely to be associated with ethnocentric and anti‐democratic attitudes, just as some types of religion—e.g., religious fundamentalism—have a close affinity to authoritarian attitudes. Using data from an online UK survey (N = 1093; quota sample, representative of education, gender, age, and region), we enquire to what extent belief in conspiracy theories is associated with xenophobic, racist, and anti‐democratic attitudes, which aspects of religiosity in combination with other factors play a role in conspiracy beliefs, and which communicative and interpretative practices are associated with belief in conspiracy ideologies. Our analysis reveals that both belief in classical conspiracy theories and belief in Covid‐19 conspiracy theories are significantly related to anti‐Muslim sentiments, anti‐Black racism, and right‐wing extremism. Moreover, a regression analysis shows that an initially discovered relationship between the strength of religiosity and conspiracy mentality disappears once religious fundamentalism is included in the model. The effect of religious fundamentalism is moderated by narcissism and the style of social media use—namely, trusting posts made by one’s friends more than the opinions of experts.
id RCAP_695b0774986571759d28f989da1140c3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UKauthoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social mediaWhile some research addresses the relationship between religiosity and political attitudes, little is known about the relationship between religion, conspiracy beliefs, and political culture. Using the concept of authoritarianism, we hypothesise that a conspiracy mentality is likely to be associated with ethnocentric and anti‐democratic attitudes, just as some types of religion—e.g., religious fundamentalism—have a close affinity to authoritarian attitudes. Using data from an online UK survey (N = 1093; quota sample, representative of education, gender, age, and region), we enquire to what extent belief in conspiracy theories is associated with xenophobic, racist, and anti‐democratic attitudes, which aspects of religiosity in combination with other factors play a role in conspiracy beliefs, and which communicative and interpretative practices are associated with belief in conspiracy ideologies. Our analysis reveals that both belief in classical conspiracy theories and belief in Covid‐19 conspiracy theories are significantly related to anti‐Muslim sentiments, anti‐Black racism, and right‐wing extremism. Moreover, a regression analysis shows that an initially discovered relationship between the strength of religiosity and conspiracy mentality disappears once religious fundamentalism is included in the model. The effect of religious fundamentalism is moderated by narcissism and the style of social media use—namely, trusting posts made by one’s friends more than the opinions of experts.Cogitatio2022-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes; 229-2422183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904/5904https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5904/2677Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Yendell, David Herbertinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYendell, AlexanderHerbert, David2022-12-22T15:16:26Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:23.485038Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
title Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
spellingShingle Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
Yendell, Alexander
authoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social media
title_short Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
title_full Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
title_fullStr Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
title_full_unstemmed Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
title_sort Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK
author Yendell, Alexander
author_facet Yendell, Alexander
Herbert, David
author_role author
author2 Herbert, David
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yendell, Alexander
Herbert, David
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv authoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social media
topic authoritarianism; conspiracies; democracy; United Kingdom; religion; social media
description While some research addresses the relationship between religiosity and political attitudes, little is known about the relationship between religion, conspiracy beliefs, and political culture. Using the concept of authoritarianism, we hypothesise that a conspiracy mentality is likely to be associated with ethnocentric and anti‐democratic attitudes, just as some types of religion—e.g., religious fundamentalism—have a close affinity to authoritarian attitudes. Using data from an online UK survey (N = 1093; quota sample, representative of education, gender, age, and region), we enquire to what extent belief in conspiracy theories is associated with xenophobic, racist, and anti‐democratic attitudes, which aspects of religiosity in combination with other factors play a role in conspiracy beliefs, and which communicative and interpretative practices are associated with belief in conspiracy ideologies. Our analysis reveals that both belief in classical conspiracy theories and belief in Covid‐19 conspiracy theories are significantly related to anti‐Muslim sentiments, anti‐Black racism, and right‐wing extremism. Moreover, a regression analysis shows that an initially discovered relationship between the strength of religiosity and conspiracy mentality disappears once religious fundamentalism is included in the model. The effect of religious fundamentalism is moderated by narcissism and the style of social media use—namely, trusting posts made by one’s friends more than the opinions of experts.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-24
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5904
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5904
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5904/5904
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5904/2677
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Yendell, David Herbert
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Yendell, David Herbert
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 4 (2022): The Role of Religions and Conspiracy Theories in Democratic and Authoritarian Regimes; 229-242
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130669578715136