A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Tânia
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Leite, Isabel, Kolinsky, Régine
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034
Resumo: Mirror invariance (i.e., processing mirror images like b and d as equivalent percepts) is an original property of the visual system entrenched by evolution. This property collides with learning a script with mirrored symbols like the Latin alphabet which requires mirror discrimination. Therefore, examining the impact of literacy on mirror-image processing is one of the most interesting ways to investigate the consequences of literacy on the evolutionary older cognitive system of visual object recognition. In the present study, we investigated when, during reading development, mirror discrimination becomes automatic in object recognition and whether the impact of literacy extends to other orientation-contrasts, considering explicit vs. implicit, automatic processing of orientation. Geometric shapes were presented to preliterate preschoolers and first-grade beginning readers on two same-different matching tasks differing by criterion: orientation-based vs. shape-based (orientation-independent) tasks. On orientation-based judgments, first-graders presented and overall advantage over preschoolers, and preschoolers showed a stronger difficulty with mirror discrimination. Thus, regarding explicit orientation processing, the impact of literacy was stronger for (but not restricted to) mirror images. In contrasts, on shape-based judgments of geometric shapes, the two groups differed only in mirrored trials. Whereas preschoolers were as able to perform shape-based judgments of identical as of mirrored pairs, first-graders exhibited a strong mirror cost: they were slower on mirrored trials, and even slower than preschoolers. This spillover effect of literacy on orientation-invariant object recognition is thus specific to mirror images. It begins to emerge with letter knowledge before literacy instruction and continues to develop along with reading skills.
id RCAP_6a06861f473c172a89de1745ac240236
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/18034
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?Literacy acquisitionObject RecognitionMirror InvarianceMirror invariance (i.e., processing mirror images like b and d as equivalent percepts) is an original property of the visual system entrenched by evolution. This property collides with learning a script with mirrored symbols like the Latin alphabet which requires mirror discrimination. Therefore, examining the impact of literacy on mirror-image processing is one of the most interesting ways to investigate the consequences of literacy on the evolutionary older cognitive system of visual object recognition. In the present study, we investigated when, during reading development, mirror discrimination becomes automatic in object recognition and whether the impact of literacy extends to other orientation-contrasts, considering explicit vs. implicit, automatic processing of orientation. Geometric shapes were presented to preliterate preschoolers and first-grade beginning readers on two same-different matching tasks differing by criterion: orientation-based vs. shape-based (orientation-independent) tasks. On orientation-based judgments, first-graders presented and overall advantage over preschoolers, and preschoolers showed a stronger difficulty with mirror discrimination. Thus, regarding explicit orientation processing, the impact of literacy was stronger for (but not restricted to) mirror images. In contrasts, on shape-based judgments of geometric shapes, the two groups differed only in mirrored trials. Whereas preschoolers were as able to perform shape-based judgments of identical as of mirrored pairs, first-graders exhibited a strong mirror cost: they were slower on mirrored trials, and even slower than preschoolers. This spillover effect of literacy on orientation-invariant object recognition is thus specific to mirror images. It begins to emerge with letter knowledge before literacy instruction and continues to develop along with reading skills.European Society for Cognitive Psychology2016-03-14T16:29:41Z2016-03-142015-09-18T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034porsimnaonaotaniapgfernandes@gmail.comimss@uevora.ptrkolins@ulb.ac.be272Fernandes, TâniaLeite, IsabelKolinsky, Régineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:05:52Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/18034Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:09:59.690957Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
title A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
spellingShingle A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
Fernandes, Tânia
Literacy acquisition
Object Recognition
Mirror Invariance
title_short A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
title_full A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
title_fullStr A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
title_full_unstemmed A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
title_sort A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
author Fernandes, Tânia
author_facet Fernandes, Tânia
Leite, Isabel
Kolinsky, Régine
author_role author
author2 Leite, Isabel
Kolinsky, Régine
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Tânia
Leite, Isabel
Kolinsky, Régine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Literacy acquisition
Object Recognition
Mirror Invariance
topic Literacy acquisition
Object Recognition
Mirror Invariance
description Mirror invariance (i.e., processing mirror images like b and d as equivalent percepts) is an original property of the visual system entrenched by evolution. This property collides with learning a script with mirrored symbols like the Latin alphabet which requires mirror discrimination. Therefore, examining the impact of literacy on mirror-image processing is one of the most interesting ways to investigate the consequences of literacy on the evolutionary older cognitive system of visual object recognition. In the present study, we investigated when, during reading development, mirror discrimination becomes automatic in object recognition and whether the impact of literacy extends to other orientation-contrasts, considering explicit vs. implicit, automatic processing of orientation. Geometric shapes were presented to preliterate preschoolers and first-grade beginning readers on two same-different matching tasks differing by criterion: orientation-based vs. shape-based (orientation-independent) tasks. On orientation-based judgments, first-graders presented and overall advantage over preschoolers, and preschoolers showed a stronger difficulty with mirror discrimination. Thus, regarding explicit orientation processing, the impact of literacy was stronger for (but not restricted to) mirror images. In contrasts, on shape-based judgments of geometric shapes, the two groups differed only in mirrored trials. Whereas preschoolers were as able to perform shape-based judgments of identical as of mirrored pairs, first-graders exhibited a strong mirror cost: they were slower on mirrored trials, and even slower than preschoolers. This spillover effect of literacy on orientation-invariant object recognition is thus specific to mirror images. It begins to emerge with letter knowledge before literacy instruction and continues to develop along with reading skills.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-18T00:00:00Z
2016-03-14T16:29:41Z
2016-03-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv sim
nao
nao
taniapgfernandes@gmail.com
imss@uevora.pt
rkolins@ulb.ac.be
272
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Society for Cognitive Psychology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Society for Cognitive Psychology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136582661308416