A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034 |
Resumo: | Mirror invariance (i.e., processing mirror images like b and d as equivalent percepts) is an original property of the visual system entrenched by evolution. This property collides with learning a script with mirrored symbols like the Latin alphabet which requires mirror discrimination. Therefore, examining the impact of literacy on mirror-image processing is one of the most interesting ways to investigate the consequences of literacy on the evolutionary older cognitive system of visual object recognition. In the present study, we investigated when, during reading development, mirror discrimination becomes automatic in object recognition and whether the impact of literacy extends to other orientation-contrasts, considering explicit vs. implicit, automatic processing of orientation. Geometric shapes were presented to preliterate preschoolers and first-grade beginning readers on two same-different matching tasks differing by criterion: orientation-based vs. shape-based (orientation-independent) tasks. On orientation-based judgments, first-graders presented and overall advantage over preschoolers, and preschoolers showed a stronger difficulty with mirror discrimination. Thus, regarding explicit orientation processing, the impact of literacy was stronger for (but not restricted to) mirror images. In contrasts, on shape-based judgments of geometric shapes, the two groups differed only in mirrored trials. Whereas preschoolers were as able to perform shape-based judgments of identical as of mirrored pairs, first-graders exhibited a strong mirror cost: they were slower on mirrored trials, and even slower than preschoolers. This spillover effect of literacy on orientation-invariant object recognition is thus specific to mirror images. It begins to emerge with letter knowledge before literacy instruction and continues to develop along with reading skills. |
id |
RCAP_6a06861f473c172a89de1745ac240236 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/18034 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition?Literacy acquisitionObject RecognitionMirror InvarianceMirror invariance (i.e., processing mirror images like b and d as equivalent percepts) is an original property of the visual system entrenched by evolution. This property collides with learning a script with mirrored symbols like the Latin alphabet which requires mirror discrimination. Therefore, examining the impact of literacy on mirror-image processing is one of the most interesting ways to investigate the consequences of literacy on the evolutionary older cognitive system of visual object recognition. In the present study, we investigated when, during reading development, mirror discrimination becomes automatic in object recognition and whether the impact of literacy extends to other orientation-contrasts, considering explicit vs. implicit, automatic processing of orientation. Geometric shapes were presented to preliterate preschoolers and first-grade beginning readers on two same-different matching tasks differing by criterion: orientation-based vs. shape-based (orientation-independent) tasks. On orientation-based judgments, first-graders presented and overall advantage over preschoolers, and preschoolers showed a stronger difficulty with mirror discrimination. Thus, regarding explicit orientation processing, the impact of literacy was stronger for (but not restricted to) mirror images. In contrasts, on shape-based judgments of geometric shapes, the two groups differed only in mirrored trials. Whereas preschoolers were as able to perform shape-based judgments of identical as of mirrored pairs, first-graders exhibited a strong mirror cost: they were slower on mirrored trials, and even slower than preschoolers. This spillover effect of literacy on orientation-invariant object recognition is thus specific to mirror images. It begins to emerge with letter knowledge before literacy instruction and continues to develop along with reading skills.European Society for Cognitive Psychology2016-03-14T16:29:41Z2016-03-142015-09-18T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034porsimnaonaotaniapgfernandes@gmail.comimss@uevora.ptrkolins@ulb.ac.be272Fernandes, TâniaLeite, IsabelKolinsky, Régineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:05:52Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/18034Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:09:59.690957Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? |
title |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? |
spellingShingle |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? Fernandes, Tânia Literacy acquisition Object Recognition Mirror Invariance |
title_short |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? |
title_full |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? |
title_fullStr |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? |
title_full_unstemmed |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? |
title_sort |
A matter of timing: when does learning to read start to impact on nonlinguistic object recognition? |
author |
Fernandes, Tânia |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Tânia Leite, Isabel Kolinsky, Régine |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Leite, Isabel Kolinsky, Régine |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Tânia Leite, Isabel Kolinsky, Régine |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Literacy acquisition Object Recognition Mirror Invariance |
topic |
Literacy acquisition Object Recognition Mirror Invariance |
description |
Mirror invariance (i.e., processing mirror images like b and d as equivalent percepts) is an original property of the visual system entrenched by evolution. This property collides with learning a script with mirrored symbols like the Latin alphabet which requires mirror discrimination. Therefore, examining the impact of literacy on mirror-image processing is one of the most interesting ways to investigate the consequences of literacy on the evolutionary older cognitive system of visual object recognition. In the present study, we investigated when, during reading development, mirror discrimination becomes automatic in object recognition and whether the impact of literacy extends to other orientation-contrasts, considering explicit vs. implicit, automatic processing of orientation. Geometric shapes were presented to preliterate preschoolers and first-grade beginning readers on two same-different matching tasks differing by criterion: orientation-based vs. shape-based (orientation-independent) tasks. On orientation-based judgments, first-graders presented and overall advantage over preschoolers, and preschoolers showed a stronger difficulty with mirror discrimination. Thus, regarding explicit orientation processing, the impact of literacy was stronger for (but not restricted to) mirror images. In contrasts, on shape-based judgments of geometric shapes, the two groups differed only in mirrored trials. Whereas preschoolers were as able to perform shape-based judgments of identical as of mirrored pairs, first-graders exhibited a strong mirror cost: they were slower on mirrored trials, and even slower than preschoolers. This spillover effect of literacy on orientation-invariant object recognition is thus specific to mirror images. It begins to emerge with letter knowledge before literacy instruction and continues to develop along with reading skills. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-09-18T00:00:00Z 2016-03-14T16:29:41Z 2016-03-14 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/18034 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
sim nao nao taniapgfernandes@gmail.com imss@uevora.pt rkolins@ulb.ac.be 272 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
European Society for Cognitive Psychology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
European Society for Cognitive Psychology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136582661308416 |