Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pais, R
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Ruano, L, P Carvalho, O, Barros, H
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143180
Resumo: Background: We proposed to review worldwide estimates of cognitive impairment prevalence and incidence in adults older than 50 years of age living in the community. (2) Methods: Systematic searches were performed in January 2019 using MEDLINE/PubMed. Articles were selected if they referred to cognitive impairment, prevalence, incidence, elders, and population or community-based studies. Analysis, aggregated by different methodologic features, was performed. (3) Results: Prevalence (80 studies) ranged between 5.1% and 41% with a median of 19.0% (25th percentile = 12.0%; 75th percentile = 24.90%). Incidence (11 studies) ranged from 22 to 76.8 per 1000 person-years with a median of 53.97 per 1000 person-years (25th percentile = 39.0; 75th percentile = 68.19). No statistically significant effects were found except for inclusion age. (4) Conclusion: We propose that the homogenization and clarification of the definition of what constitutes cognitive impairment are essential to refine the epidemiological understanding of this entity. The results of this review reinforce the importance of adherence to standardized cut-off scores for cognitive tests to promote study comparability.
id RCAP_6a0ad384b8ba1e67443dc20a709da3b5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/143180
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Reviewepidemiologycognitive impairmentprevalenceincidenceBackground: We proposed to review worldwide estimates of cognitive impairment prevalence and incidence in adults older than 50 years of age living in the community. (2) Methods: Systematic searches were performed in January 2019 using MEDLINE/PubMed. Articles were selected if they referred to cognitive impairment, prevalence, incidence, elders, and population or community-based studies. Analysis, aggregated by different methodologic features, was performed. (3) Results: Prevalence (80 studies) ranged between 5.1% and 41% with a median of 19.0% (25th percentile = 12.0%; 75th percentile = 24.90%). Incidence (11 studies) ranged from 22 to 76.8 per 1000 person-years with a median of 53.97 per 1000 person-years (25th percentile = 39.0; 75th percentile = 68.19). No statistically significant effects were found except for inclusion age. (4) Conclusion: We propose that the homogenization and clarification of the definition of what constitutes cognitive impairment are essential to refine the epidemiological understanding of this entity. The results of this review reinforce the importance of adherence to standardized cut-off scores for cognitive tests to promote study comparability.MDPI20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10216/143180eng2308-341710.3390/geriatrics5040084Pais, RRuano, LP Carvalho, OBarros, Hinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-09-27T09:20:53Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/143180Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-09-27T09:20:53Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
title Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
spellingShingle Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
Pais, R
epidemiology
cognitive impairment
prevalence
incidence
title_short Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
title_full Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
title_sort Global Cognitive Impairment Prevalence and Incidence in Community Dwelling Older Adults-A Systematic Review
author Pais, R
author_facet Pais, R
Ruano, L
P Carvalho, O
Barros, H
author_role author
author2 Ruano, L
P Carvalho, O
Barros, H
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pais, R
Ruano, L
P Carvalho, O
Barros, H
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv epidemiology
cognitive impairment
prevalence
incidence
topic epidemiology
cognitive impairment
prevalence
incidence
description Background: We proposed to review worldwide estimates of cognitive impairment prevalence and incidence in adults older than 50 years of age living in the community. (2) Methods: Systematic searches were performed in January 2019 using MEDLINE/PubMed. Articles were selected if they referred to cognitive impairment, prevalence, incidence, elders, and population or community-based studies. Analysis, aggregated by different methodologic features, was performed. (3) Results: Prevalence (80 studies) ranged between 5.1% and 41% with a median of 19.0% (25th percentile = 12.0%; 75th percentile = 24.90%). Incidence (11 studies) ranged from 22 to 76.8 per 1000 person-years with a median of 53.97 per 1000 person-years (25th percentile = 39.0; 75th percentile = 68.19). No statistically significant effects were found except for inclusion age. (4) Conclusion: We propose that the homogenization and clarification of the definition of what constitutes cognitive impairment are essential to refine the epidemiological understanding of this entity. The results of this review reinforce the importance of adherence to standardized cut-off scores for cognitive tests to promote study comparability.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143180
url https://hdl.handle.net/10216/143180
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2308-3417
10.3390/geriatrics5040084
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817548262505185280