Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa, Patrícia
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Kochetkova, Nadezda, Correia de Oliveira, Susana, Mota, Paula, Dias, Ângela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v32.i1.23884
Resumo: Introduction: Lower respiratory infections are a major cause of hospital admission in pediatric care. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most commonly identified agent, either isolated or with other agents. Coinfection rates vary between 10-44%, with conflicting data regarding the role of coinfection in clinical severity. Aims: This study aimed to assess whether viral respiratory coinfection is associated with a more severe clinical course. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on the clinical records of patients under the age of five years admitted to the Pediatric Department of a level II hospital over 13 months and who tested positive in the immunofluorescence viral analysis of nasopharyngeal aspirates. Ten viruses were investigated. Results: A total of 224 positive cases were identified among 434 patients in the study cohort (51.6%), with a coinfection rate of 5.8% (n=13). RSV was the most common virus, detected in 76.9% of coinfections. RSV-Coronavirus OC43 was the most common association found in coinfections. Forty-four percent of patients required supplemental oxygen. Five percent were transferred to a tertiary care hospital, although neither presented with coinfection. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups for any of the considered parameters, including hospital length of stay, transferal rate, supplementary oxygen requirement, or use of intravenous corticosteroids. Despite this, differences were found in the percentage of patients with at least one risk factor for respiratory infections (56% in patients with one virus identified vs. 69% in patients with coinfection). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that viral respiratory coinfection is not associated with a more severe clinical course. The scarcity of national studies and variable results in the literature highlight the need for additional studies with greater statistical power to better clarify the prognosis of patients with respiratory viral coinfection.
id RCAP_6a539cf2a69d11995944ada7533446c1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/23884
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?Estará a coinfeção vírica respiratória associada a maior gravidade clínica?Original ArticlesIntroduction: Lower respiratory infections are a major cause of hospital admission in pediatric care. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most commonly identified agent, either isolated or with other agents. Coinfection rates vary between 10-44%, with conflicting data regarding the role of coinfection in clinical severity. Aims: This study aimed to assess whether viral respiratory coinfection is associated with a more severe clinical course. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on the clinical records of patients under the age of five years admitted to the Pediatric Department of a level II hospital over 13 months and who tested positive in the immunofluorescence viral analysis of nasopharyngeal aspirates. Ten viruses were investigated. Results: A total of 224 positive cases were identified among 434 patients in the study cohort (51.6%), with a coinfection rate of 5.8% (n=13). RSV was the most common virus, detected in 76.9% of coinfections. RSV-Coronavirus OC43 was the most common association found in coinfections. Forty-four percent of patients required supplemental oxygen. Five percent were transferred to a tertiary care hospital, although neither presented with coinfection. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups for any of the considered parameters, including hospital length of stay, transferal rate, supplementary oxygen requirement, or use of intravenous corticosteroids. Despite this, differences were found in the percentage of patients with at least one risk factor for respiratory infections (56% in patients with one virus identified vs. 69% in patients with coinfection). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that viral respiratory coinfection is not associated with a more severe clinical course. The scarcity of national studies and variable results in the literature highlight the need for additional studies with greater statistical power to better clarify the prognosis of patients with respiratory viral coinfection.Introdução: As infeções respiratórias inferiores (IRI) são uma causa frequente de internamento hospitalar em Pediatria. O agente etiológico mais prevalente é o vírus sincicial respiratório (VSR); quer isoladamente; quer em contexto de coinfeção. As taxas de coinfeção na literatura variam entre 10-44%; não existindo consenso quanto ao impacto da coinfeção no prognóstico das IRI. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar uma possível associação entre coinfeção vírica e gravidade clínica. Materiais e Métodos: Foi conduzido um estudo observacional retrospetivo com base na informação contida nos processos clínicos de doentes com idade inferior a cinco anos admitidos ao longo de 13 meses no Serviço de Pediatria de um hospital de nível II e com resultados positivos no exame virológico do lavado nasofaríngeo (pesquisa de 10 vírus por análise de imunoensaio fluorenzimático). Resultados: Foram identificados 224 resultados positivos em 434 doentes na coorte de estudo (51.6%); com uma taxa de coinfeção de 5.8%. O vírus mais prevalente foi o VSR; presente em 76.9% das coinfeções. A associação mais frequentemente identificada foi entre o VSR e o Coronavírus OC43. Cinco por cento dos doentes foram transferidos para unidades hospitalares de nível III; nenhum dos quais com coinfeção. Não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os doentes com um ou mais vírus detetados para qualquer dos parâmetros analisados; nomeadamente duração do internamento; taxa de transferência; e necessidade de oxigenoterapia ou corticoterapia endovenosa. Apesar disso; a presença de fatores de risco para IRI foi mais frequente nos doentes com coinfeção. Conclusões: No presente estudo; a coinfeção vírica não se associou a uma maior gravidade clínica. A escassez de estudos nacionais e os resultados variáveis na literatura revelam a necessidade de estudos com maior poder estatístico para melhor esclarecer o prognóstico da coinfeção virica respiratória.Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António2023-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v32.i1.23884eng2183-9417Sousa, PatríciaKochetkova, NadezdaCorreia de Oliveira, SusanaMota, PaulaDias, Ângelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-29T17:00:23Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/23884Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:01:42.393567Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
Estará a coinfeção vírica respiratória associada a maior gravidade clínica?
title Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
spellingShingle Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
Sousa, Patrícia
Original Articles
title_short Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
title_full Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
title_fullStr Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
title_full_unstemmed Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
title_sort Is respiratory viral coinfection associated with greater clinical severity?
author Sousa, Patrícia
author_facet Sousa, Patrícia
Kochetkova, Nadezda
Correia de Oliveira, Susana
Mota, Paula
Dias, Ângela
author_role author
author2 Kochetkova, Nadezda
Correia de Oliveira, Susana
Mota, Paula
Dias, Ângela
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa, Patrícia
Kochetkova, Nadezda
Correia de Oliveira, Susana
Mota, Paula
Dias, Ângela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Original Articles
topic Original Articles
description Introduction: Lower respiratory infections are a major cause of hospital admission in pediatric care. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most commonly identified agent, either isolated or with other agents. Coinfection rates vary between 10-44%, with conflicting data regarding the role of coinfection in clinical severity. Aims: This study aimed to assess whether viral respiratory coinfection is associated with a more severe clinical course. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on the clinical records of patients under the age of five years admitted to the Pediatric Department of a level II hospital over 13 months and who tested positive in the immunofluorescence viral analysis of nasopharyngeal aspirates. Ten viruses were investigated. Results: A total of 224 positive cases were identified among 434 patients in the study cohort (51.6%), with a coinfection rate of 5.8% (n=13). RSV was the most common virus, detected in 76.9% of coinfections. RSV-Coronavirus OC43 was the most common association found in coinfections. Forty-four percent of patients required supplemental oxygen. Five percent were transferred to a tertiary care hospital, although neither presented with coinfection. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups for any of the considered parameters, including hospital length of stay, transferal rate, supplementary oxygen requirement, or use of intravenous corticosteroids. Despite this, differences were found in the percentage of patients with at least one risk factor for respiratory infections (56% in patients with one virus identified vs. 69% in patients with coinfection). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that viral respiratory coinfection is not associated with a more severe clinical course. The scarcity of national studies and variable results in the literature highlight the need for additional studies with greater statistical power to better clarify the prognosis of patients with respiratory viral coinfection.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-23
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v32.i1.23884
url https://doi.org/10.25753/BirthGrowthMJ.v32.i1.23884
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-9417
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131684591894528