Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Moreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges, Amaral, António Fernando Salgueiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3444-8
Resumo: Background The increasing complexity and demand in health care, together with patients' changing needs, put into evidence the need for nurses to focus their interventions on people's real needs, thus rethinking their role. In this context, unfinished, delayed, or missed nursing care (MNC), which is a strong indicator of health care quality, can compromise quality care and patient safety. Objective To identify the most common MNC, as well as its predictors and strategies to prevent its occurrence. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted on studies available in the EBSCOhost and B-on databases. Twenty-four articles were selected based on predefined criteria. All articles were published between 2012 and 2017. Results The studies showed that nurses and patients have different perceptions about MNC. Autonomous interventions related to early mobility and walking, repositioning every 2 hours, or oral and body hygiene are more often missed than interdependent interventions. [1-5]. Medication administration within 30 minutes of prescription, planning and update of care plans, vital signs monitoring, and treatment effectiveness assessment also emerged as MNC [5-7]. Predictive factors are associated with the patient (health status/workload) [2, 5]; the nurse (interruptions by other professionals or patients' relatives) [4, 8]; the materials or equipment (late deliveries) [9], or the hospital's health care policies (management/leadership and staffing) [10]. The nurse-patient/family communication emerged as MNC, whereas the nurse-other health professional communication emerged as a predictive factor because teamwork and its effectiveness are compromised [2, 11]. Nurses' personal interests and moral sense can influence the occurrence of MNC. Therefore, the strategies used to reduce the incidence of MNC should be adjusted to the needs of each setting [2, 5]. Conclusions Although MNCs are being explored internationally, it is an understudied topic in Portugal, which may be explained by the punitive error reporting culture. The findings cannot be generalized due to the diversity of studies. Thus, the phenomenon of MNC and its impact on patient/family prognosis should be explored in different settings, with the purpose of achieving excellence in health care and ensuring that people recognize the importance of health care.
id RCAP_6a8173de5ca9a867e6f05cc40c2119da
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:8440
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factorsMissed Nursing CareBackground The increasing complexity and demand in health care, together with patients' changing needs, put into evidence the need for nurses to focus their interventions on people's real needs, thus rethinking their role. In this context, unfinished, delayed, or missed nursing care (MNC), which is a strong indicator of health care quality, can compromise quality care and patient safety. Objective To identify the most common MNC, as well as its predictors and strategies to prevent its occurrence. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted on studies available in the EBSCOhost and B-on databases. Twenty-four articles were selected based on predefined criteria. All articles were published between 2012 and 2017. Results The studies showed that nurses and patients have different perceptions about MNC. Autonomous interventions related to early mobility and walking, repositioning every 2 hours, or oral and body hygiene are more often missed than interdependent interventions. [1-5]. Medication administration within 30 minutes of prescription, planning and update of care plans, vital signs monitoring, and treatment effectiveness assessment also emerged as MNC [5-7]. Predictive factors are associated with the patient (health status/workload) [2, 5]; the nurse (interruptions by other professionals or patients' relatives) [4, 8]; the materials or equipment (late deliveries) [9], or the hospital's health care policies (management/leadership and staffing) [10]. The nurse-patient/family communication emerged as MNC, whereas the nurse-other health professional communication emerged as a predictive factor because teamwork and its effectiveness are compromised [2, 11]. Nurses' personal interests and moral sense can influence the occurrence of MNC. Therefore, the strategies used to reduce the incidence of MNC should be adjusted to the needs of each setting [2, 5]. Conclusions Although MNCs are being explored internationally, it is an understudied topic in Portugal, which may be explained by the punitive error reporting culture. The findings cannot be generalized due to the diversity of studies. Thus, the phenomenon of MNC and its impact on patient/family prognosis should be explored in different settings, with the purpose of achieving excellence in health care and ensuring that people recognize the importance of health care.BMC Health Services Research2018-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3444-8https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3444-8enghttp://web.esenfc.pt/?url=lj5hLeVtPaiva, Ivo Cristiano SoaresMoreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro BorgesAmaral, António Fernando Salgueiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2019-03-20T00:00:00Zoai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:8440Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:12:42.751858Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
title Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
spellingShingle Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares
Missed Nursing Care
title_short Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
title_full Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
title_fullStr Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
title_full_unstemmed Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
title_sort Missed Nursing Care: Incidence and predictive factors
author Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares
author_facet Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares
Moreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges
Amaral, António Fernando Salgueiro
author_role author
author2 Moreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges
Amaral, António Fernando Salgueiro
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares
Moreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges
Amaral, António Fernando Salgueiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Missed Nursing Care
topic Missed Nursing Care
description Background The increasing complexity and demand in health care, together with patients' changing needs, put into evidence the need for nurses to focus their interventions on people's real needs, thus rethinking their role. In this context, unfinished, delayed, or missed nursing care (MNC), which is a strong indicator of health care quality, can compromise quality care and patient safety. Objective To identify the most common MNC, as well as its predictors and strategies to prevent its occurrence. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted on studies available in the EBSCOhost and B-on databases. Twenty-four articles were selected based on predefined criteria. All articles were published between 2012 and 2017. Results The studies showed that nurses and patients have different perceptions about MNC. Autonomous interventions related to early mobility and walking, repositioning every 2 hours, or oral and body hygiene are more often missed than interdependent interventions. [1-5]. Medication administration within 30 minutes of prescription, planning and update of care plans, vital signs monitoring, and treatment effectiveness assessment also emerged as MNC [5-7]. Predictive factors are associated with the patient (health status/workload) [2, 5]; the nurse (interruptions by other professionals or patients' relatives) [4, 8]; the materials or equipment (late deliveries) [9], or the hospital's health care policies (management/leadership and staffing) [10]. The nurse-patient/family communication emerged as MNC, whereas the nurse-other health professional communication emerged as a predictive factor because teamwork and its effectiveness are compromised [2, 11]. Nurses' personal interests and moral sense can influence the occurrence of MNC. Therefore, the strategies used to reduce the incidence of MNC should be adjusted to the needs of each setting [2, 5]. Conclusions Although MNCs are being explored internationally, it is an understudied topic in Portugal, which may be explained by the punitive error reporting culture. The findings cannot be generalized due to the diversity of studies. Thus, the phenomenon of MNC and its impact on patient/family prognosis should be explored in different settings, with the purpose of achieving excellence in health care and ensuring that people recognize the importance of health care.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-13
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3444-8
https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3444-8
url https://doi.org/info:doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3444-8
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://web.esenfc.pt/?url=lj5hLeVt
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC Health Services Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC Health Services Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137229526794240