The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Livro |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/117631 |
Resumo: | This paper analyses and compares codes and standards that support interventions onbuilt heritage of three Southern European countries with similar cultural approaches, Italy, Spain andPortugal, and confronts these documents with technical expert opinion. This discussion recognizes theimportance of incorporating flexible criteria on code application, but also that such criteria should be sustained by inventorying and cataloguing processes based on multidisciplinary assessment methodologies.When dealing with inhabited built heritage, this assessment methodology should not only be supported bysafety and housing conditions criteria embedded in technical codes and standards and local guidelines oriented to the local characteristics of the constructions, but should also include the assessment of the needsand expectations of residents. This work is part of a vast study that includes and sustains the developmentof a multidisciplinary assessment methodology to be applied on built heritage. |
id |
RCAP_6bc7a776b16cbde18db6a349e4f749bb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/117631 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritageThis paper analyses and compares codes and standards that support interventions onbuilt heritage of three Southern European countries with similar cultural approaches, Italy, Spain andPortugal, and confronts these documents with technical expert opinion. This discussion recognizes theimportance of incorporating flexible criteria on code application, but also that such criteria should be sustained by inventorying and cataloguing processes based on multidisciplinary assessment methodologies.When dealing with inhabited built heritage, this assessment methodology should not only be supported bysafety and housing conditions criteria embedded in technical codes and standards and local guidelines oriented to the local characteristics of the constructions, but should also include the assessment of the needsand expectations of residents. This work is part of a vast study that includes and sustains the developmentof a multidisciplinary assessment methodology to be applied on built heritage.20162016-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookapplication/pdfhttps://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/117631engCilísia OrnelasIsabel Breda VázquezJoão Paulo Miranda Guedesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-29T15:20:07Zoai:repositorio-aberto.up.pt:10216/117631Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:20:57.487910Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage |
title |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage |
spellingShingle |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage Cilísia Ornelas |
title_short |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage |
title_full |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage |
title_fullStr |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage |
title_full_unstemmed |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage |
title_sort |
The role of a systematic analysis of building codes to support an assessment methodology for built heritage |
author |
Cilísia Ornelas |
author_facet |
Cilísia Ornelas Isabel Breda Vázquez João Paulo Miranda Guedes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Isabel Breda Vázquez João Paulo Miranda Guedes |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cilísia Ornelas Isabel Breda Vázquez João Paulo Miranda Guedes |
description |
This paper analyses and compares codes and standards that support interventions onbuilt heritage of three Southern European countries with similar cultural approaches, Italy, Spain andPortugal, and confronts these documents with technical expert opinion. This discussion recognizes theimportance of incorporating flexible criteria on code application, but also that such criteria should be sustained by inventorying and cataloguing processes based on multidisciplinary assessment methodologies.When dealing with inhabited built heritage, this assessment methodology should not only be supported bysafety and housing conditions criteria embedded in technical codes and standards and local guidelines oriented to the local characteristics of the constructions, but should also include the assessment of the needsand expectations of residents. This work is part of a vast study that includes and sustains the developmentof a multidisciplinary assessment methodology to be applied on built heritage. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/book |
format |
book |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/117631 |
url |
https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/117631 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136126016946177 |